Originally posted by Robtard
YouTube video
Hawkeyes explosive arrow didn't hurt him. And he held that thing to his face.
Pwned!
Originally posted by Robtard
YouTube video
Hawkeyes explosive arrow didn't hurt him. And he held that thing to his face.
Pwned!
Originally posted by the ninjak
I don't!Hawkeye's arrow took out a chunk of a Helicarrier's fan engine.
Ironman's just took out a tank.
Why Hawkeye didn't use more of them is up to you and Joss Whedon.
You realize that was a M1 or M2 Abrams tank he took out with that tiny missile, thats one of the most armored and solid tanks in the world.
If Hawkeye had hit that tank with the same arrow he used on the hellecat it would have done nothing to it. Where talking about thick tank magnesium re enforced by steel armor. The hellecarrier was made to light weight and the fans on it where not up armored like a tank would be.
The missile would not have killed Loki by any means, it would prolly have been the same as him getting hit with the phase 2 destroyer weapon by Phil on the Hellicarrier.
Originally posted by the ninjak
Dude he used an explosive arrow on the Helicarrier.To argue that the Tank was more durable than one of the outer rims of one of the turbines that kept it airborne is quite simply madness.
I used to drive those tanks for a living so I know what they are capable of withstanding. That arrow would not have wrecked the tank like Iron Man did.
Originally posted by SupraPretty sure that wasn't an Abrams tank. At least I can't see the studio putting America's MBT in the hands of fake Al Qaeda, that's just bad PR.
You realize that was a M1 or M2 Abrams tank he took out with that tiny missile, thats one of the most armored and solid tanks in the world.
Originally posted by Supra
I used to drive those tanks for a living so I know what they are capable of withstanding. That arrow would not have wrecked the tank like Iron Man did.
Yes but you've never had a chance to drive the hellicarrier so you can't really say that the tank is tougher than the hellicarrier.
In this fictional world of Marvel, SHIELD is supposed to be the topmost, most high-tech military organization in the world. Do you really believe that the standard abrams tank of the US military would be tougher than the numero-uno battleship of SHIELD?
Originally posted by the ninjak
Dude he used an explosive arrow on the Helicarrier.To argue that the Tank was more durable than one of the outer rims of one of the turbines that kept it airborne is quite simply madness.
Not really, no.
Originally posted by Newjak
Except he wouldn't be just standing there. Loki isn't exactly slow as depicted in his fight with Thor he is quite agile. He could dodge IM's attacks.
That's a fair point. However, with said statement I was refuting the notion that Iron Man would be unable to hurt Loki.
Originally posted by Robtard
Pretty sure that wasn't an Abrams tank. At least I can't see the studio putting America's MBT in the hands of fake Al Qaeda, that's just bad PR.
Yet the whole premise of Iron Man 1 was Stark Tech selling weapons to the terrorist Raza and his group of terrorists. So yes they had american weapons.
And it was a Abrams tank, I could spot one from a mile away. Part of my training in the marines.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Yes but you've never had a chance to drive the hellicarrier so you can't really say that the tank is tougher than the hellicarrier.In this fictional world of Marvel, SHIELD is supposed to be the topmost, most high-tech military organization in the world. Do you really believe that the standard abrams tank of the US military would be tougher than the numero-uno battleship of SHIELD?
It was not reinforced armor that made up the fans, it was made a light weight metal. As you can tell from the movie.
A tank is made very differently, its supposed to the most compact armored vehicle in the world. An abrams tank can actually shug off t-90 armored shells and keep going.
Originally posted by Supra
Yet the whole premise of Iron Man 1 was Stark Tech selling weapons to the terrorist Raza and his group of terrorists. So yes they had american weapons.And it was a Abrams tank, I could spot one from a mile away. Part of my training in the marines.
I don't think Stark Enterprises made Abrams Tanks; I'm like 100% sure. The reason the jihadist had Stark ordnance is cos Stane was black market selling them.
LoLz. K.
Originally posted by Robtard
I don't think Stark Enterprises made Abrams Tanks; I'm like 100% sure. The reason the jihadist had Stark ordnance is cos Stane was black market selling them.LoLz. K.
True I did not say stark was selling them tanks. However if we get back to his missle vs. the tank. As I said I'm a tanker in the military. So we learn to identify tanks quickly. And that was no Russian T-90
Look closely at the video and at the picture. You will see its the same tank.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cmhk9CzCW4Y