Iron Man vs. Loki

Started by quanchi11216 pages

Originally posted by ares834
Yes, IM likely would have been killed by such an attack. But we literally see Loki being hurt by IM's repulsor beams. So saying he can somehow tank them for hours is rather laughable.
Focus clearly is wrong if he thinks Loki is indestructible.

Originally posted by ares834
Yes, IM likely would have been killed by such an attack. But we literally see Loki being hurt by IM's repulsor beams. So saying he can somehow tank them for hours is rather laughable.

No we don't see Loki hurt by the repulsors. IM hits Loki with the repulsors and Loki is launched back. He smiles and puts up his hands in surrender.

Later on Cap says something like, "There's something wrong. Someone who packs that kind of punch doesn't just give up so easily". Paraphrasing, but I know it was something like that.

Later on we find out that Loki actually wanted to be captured so he can trigger Hulk.

So in the end, we don't really know how much the repulsors hurt Loki. We do know that he suffered no damage from it and was even able to smile after being hit.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Focus clearly is wrong if he thinks Loki is indestructible.

clearly. no evidence needed because you're quanchi. in fact im sure i somehow just conceded.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
clearly. no evidence needed because you're quanchi. in fact im sure i somehow just conceded.
So since he survived Hulks beat down you jump to indestructible. That's such a far jump without any real evidence to support such a theory.

Just another analogy for everyone to consider:

IM with all of his arsenal was unable to take down one of the chitauri leviathans. Hulk took out a leviathan with a single punch. Hulk slammed Loki multiple times (and slamming someone on the ground with full force is usually stronger than a punch) yet Loki survived without serious injury. Pretty much shows that IM doesn't have what it takes to fully take out Loki.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So since he survived Hulks beat down you jump to indestructible. That's such a far jump without any real evidence to support such a theory.

oh i see. its not "real" evidence because you don't acknowledge it. well i guess you win again! WOOHOO!!!

Originally posted by focus4chumps
oh i see. its not "real" evidence because you don't acknowledge it. well i guess you win again! WOOHOO!!!
Loki is tough to beat but to say he's indestructible is nuts. Don't be so nuts.

Originally posted by FrothByte
No we don't see Loki hurt by the repulsors. IM hits Loki with the repulsors and Loki is launched back. He smiles and puts up his hands in surrender.

We also hear Loki grunt in pain. In other words, he was hurt.

Originally posted by ares834
We also hear Loki grunt in pain. In other words, he was hurt.

loki does a lot of grunting in pain, gets slapped around, and gets beaten down with more blunt force trauma then possibly ever depicted on screen, and yet he keeps getting up doesnt he?

So Loki was somewhat hurt but nowhere near enough to be defeated. I mean why are you even arguing about this ?

Originally posted by focus4chumps
loki does a lot of grunting in pain, gets slapped around, and gets beaten down with more blunt force trauma then possibly ever depicted on screen, and yet he keeps getting up doesnt he?

What's you're point? If a single blast makes makes him grunt; imagine what a hundred or thousand would do. Loki, sure as hell, won't be able to just casually sit there and tank everything Tony can throw at him.

you sure are making a huge deal over a grunt. i bet he grunts when pooping.

So those on the IM team have no real arguments as to how Stark can put down Loki permanently.
Yet Loki has two methods to put IM down for good with feats that actually back him up.

Originally posted by the ninjak
So those on the IM team have no real arguments as to how Stark can put down Loki permanently.
Yet Loki has two methods to put IM down for good with feats that actually back him up.

Pretty much the same argument on the Loki vs. Hellboy thread. Both Hellboy and IM have the means to hurt Loki and put up a fight, but no means to really take Loki out.

Who exactly has the means to take out Loki, I mean physically?

If you choose to take that Hulk scene seriously, he probably didn't even get a scratch (from any attack really), so he is basically invulnerable. What happens when fanboys disregard writing inconsistencies.

YouTube video

Should note the Hulk attack left his face bleeding

Also, how superhuman is Stark because Loki tossing him through that glass should have killed him on impact and it didn't leave a scratch on him.

Originally posted by Placidity

If you choose to take that Hulk scene seriously

most heated and angry arguments in this forum would be nonexistent if people would stop with this childish and petty practice of "that scene doesnt count because i said so".

it was in the film, so it counts. simple as that. deal with it.

if that makes loki (almost?) indestructible, then it is what it is.

Originally posted by ares834
What's you're point? If a single blast makes makes him grunt; imagine what a hundred or thousand would do. Loki, sure as hell, won't be able to just casually sit there and tank everything Tony can throw at him.
Except he wouldn't be just standing there. Loki isn't exactly slow as depicted in his fight with Thor he is quite agile. He could dodge IM's attacks.

He didn't dodge IM's attacks when IM blasted him in Stark Tower

YouTube video