Voldemort vs. Sauron

Started by quanchi11230 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
Sure you did.

No limit fallacy still in regards to AK 🙂

Incorrect, you claimed AK woould "kill Sauron", I'm asking you to post prove, which you've been unable to do for 13 pages now 🙂

You should really learn what 'burden of proof' entails when you make these baseless assertions, since you do it all the time 🙂

What did I make up ?

Sauron can die and the Ak kills. Far less has killed Sauron.

Ak kills and based off the evidence it kills Sauron. He has no showings resisting death of any kind.

Ak kills. If you feel it doesn't work the burden is on you to establish that.

Originally posted by quanchi112
What did I make up ?

Sauron can die and the Ak kills. Far less has killed Sauron.

Ak kills and based off the evidence it kills Sauron. He has no showings resisting death of any kind.

Ak kills. If you feel it doesn't work the burden is on you to establish that.

Lots of nonsese.

Removing the One Ring destroyed his physical form and destroying the One Ring killed him. That's the films 🙂

How many times are you going to use that no limit? "AK killed wizards, so it can kill Sauron."

Again, you're trying to avoid the BURDEN OF PROOF. You claimed AK kills Sauron, not me. Prove it without resorting to baseless assertions 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Lots of nonsese.

Removing the One Ring destroyed his physical form and destroying the One Ring killed him. That's the films 🙂

How many times are you going to use that no limit? "AK killed wizards, so it can kill Sauron."

Again, you're trying to avoid the BURDEN OF PROOF. You claimed AK kills Sauron, not me. Prove it without resorting to baseless assertions 🙂

So nothing really you just wanted to spout more nonsense.

That is one way to kill his body. If you feel that is the only way you have to provide a resistance feat with his physical body.

Ak kills. Sauron can be killed. You claiming he can resist a spell which kills is on you.

🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
So nothing really you just wanted to spout more nonsense.

That is one way to kill his body. If you feel that is the only way you have to provide a resistance feat with his physical body.

Ak kills. Sauron can be killed.

You claiming he can resist a spell which kills is on you.

🙂

No, what I said.

I made no such claims. You're claiming Sauron can die by a way that's nothing like what was shown in LoTR.That is fine, just post proof 🙂

Baseless assertion yet again. Prove Sauron can be killed by A

You're lying again. Asking you to prove your claim is not making a claim 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not humorous.

Maybe you just don't have a sense of humor? Ever thought of that.

Originally posted by Robtard
No, what I said.

I made no such claims. You're claiming Sauron can die by a way that's nothing like what was shown in LoTR.That is fine, just post proof 🙂

Baseless assertion yet again. Prove Sauron can be killed by A

You're lying again. Asking you to prove your claim is not making a claim 🙂

You gave a non answer.

The spell doesn't exist in the Lotr, dummy. It's like saying prove the Ak can kill Jack Reacher since it's not in his movies,

Basically your trashy logic is spells in a particular universe only work in that particular universe.

You're very bad at this.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You gave a non answer.

The spell doesn't exist in the Lotr, dummy. It's like saying prove the Ak can kill Jack Reacher since it's not in his movies,

Basically your trashy logic is spells in a particular universe only work in that particular universe.

You're very bad at this.

/derp tactics to try and start an insult match. /ignoring 🙂

Non sequitur response, but an incorrect claim nonetheless. Here is why you're wrong again: We can safely conclude that AK would kill Reacher, since AK has killed very human-like beings; those would be HP wizards. 🙂 Try again and try not to fail so miserably?

You're strawmanning and attacking that out of desperation cos you can't show a shred of proof for your claims. 🙂

Anytime you want to show proof of your "AK kills Sauron" claim instead of clinging futilely to no limits fallacies and baseless assertions, it would be nice 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
/derp tactics to try and start an insult match. /ignoring 🙂

Non sequitur response, but an incorrect claim nonetheless. Here is why you're wrong: We can conclude that AK would kill Reacher, since AK has killed human-like beings; those would be HP wizards. 🙂 Try again and try not to fail so miserably?

You're strawmanning and attacking that out of desperation cos you can't show a shred of proof for your claims. 🙂

Anytime you want to show proof of your "AK kills Sauron" claim instead of clinging futilely to no limits fallacies and baseless assertions, it would be nice 🙂

The Ak killed a spider which isn't human like at all. Human and elvish weapons killed Sauron so why can't Voldemort ?

What sort of resistances did Sauron display ?

Ak kills. If you feel he resists offer proof.

As it stands Voldemort wins in a multitude of ways.

Sauron has shit for feats besides beating up an old kook of a wizard

Originally posted by Firefly218
Maybe you just don't have a sense of humor? Ever thought of that.
Absurd.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The Ak killed a spider which isn't human like at all. Human and elvish weapons killed Sauron so why can't Voldemort ?

What sort of resistances did Sauron display ?

Ak kills. If you feel he resists offer proof.

As it stands Voldemort wins in a multitude of ways.

So we can conclude that AK would kill spiders (dare I blanket and say regular animals?) in other film universes too 🙂

Lack of proof isn't proof. The way it works: The person who makes the claim is the one who needs to support it. You're trying the "what I say is true until someone disproves it" tactics 🙂

AK does kill. Now show proof it can kill Sauron instead of using no limit fallacies 🙂

As it stands, you've yet to back up your claims and are making baseless assertions 🙂 "AK kills Sauron because I say so" is not a proper debate. 🙂

Originally posted by Supra
Sauron has shit for feats besides beating up an old kook of a wizard

Which film did this happen in?

Originally posted by Robtard
Which film did this happen in?

Desolation of Smaug

Originally posted by Supra
Desolation of Smaug

That Sauron was out of his body. This is the Sauron in armor.

Of course, Sauron with no body has a better destructive feat than everything in HP.

And Supra, plz stop dickriding quan, at least show some dignity will you?

Originally posted by StealthRanger
Of course, Sauron with no body has a better destructive feat than everything in HP.

And Supra, plz stop dickriding quan, at least show some dignity will you?

I don't even know you so stfu kid.

Originally posted by Supra
I don't even know you so stfu kid.

I'm the guy you put on ignore, remember

Originally posted by StealthRanger
I'm the guy you put on ignore, remember

No that was the other stealth, but I guess the two tools mixed up, welcome to my ignore list. Bye!

You say that as if it means shit

Such a hardass, Supra-kun

I have again Mastered the Art of the Stealth Masters.