Star Trek reboot vs. Star Trek original

Originally posted by quanchi112
Calm down. I saw the film. Lol.

Stop lying, it's clear you didn't.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I didn't imply any such thing.

The same way you don't know anything about the originals, yes.

You admitted you didn't see the second one. Just defer to me here.

Originally posted by Robtard
Stop lying, it's clear you didn't.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You used a non-movie/canon source in your argument, which is against the rules.

Are you above the rules?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I used it once. Why do you keep Bringing it up ?

You used it knowing that it was against the rules, are you above the rules?

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, but this from the guy who doesn't know what reboot means. Lol.

You admitted you didn't see the second one. Just defer to me here.

Really Quan, more bashing? I thought you wanted to debate.

About what? I've already stated I didn't see the second one. Unless the Nerada was in the second one too, all my points stand.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You used it knowing that it was against the rules, are you above the rules?

Originally posted by -Pr-
Really Quan, more bashing? I thought you wanted to debate.

About what? I've already stated I didn't see the second one. Unless the Nerada was in the second one too, all my points stand.

Dreadnaught, Khan, Klingons, etc. with this on top of the red matter, Narada, superior movie feats proves my case.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I supported my argument once. Keep asking me though.

No, you used a non-movie, non-canon fanmade website in an attempt to try and support your argument, however using such a site is against the rules.

Are you above the rules?

Originally posted by quanchi112
You do this in every thread. I did. Terrible film btw.

Borg queen was that awful actress from Sleeepwalkers.

Only when it's clear you're arguing from ignorance. Which is often lately.

Great, you googled a little bit of info. Zefram Cochran was played by the farmer from Babe. You know all the important stuff now and can debate.

Now plagiarize some from non canon sources some more, that's special.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I do want to debate but you keep insisting I never saw these movies so I will respond in kind.

Dreadnaught, Khan, Klingons, etc. with this on top of the red matter, Narada, superior movie feats proves my case.

You started it. shrug

And yet you continue to completely ignore the original universe's capabilities. Interesting, that. Repeating the same thing over and over without a "how" does not debating make.

Originally posted by -Pr-
You started it. shrug

And yet you continue to completely ignore the original universe's capabilities. Interesting, that. Repeating the same thing over and over without a "how" does not debating make.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, you used a non-movie, non-canon fanmade website in an attempt to try and support your argument, however using such a site is against the rules.

Are you above the rules?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I gave you the how multiple times. That sounded kind of gay.

It did.

Not really. You haven't said how the JJ-era ships would overcome the shields of ships over a century more advanced. Red Matter isn't capable of firing more than one shot per load. Not to mention the fact that the only storage tank of Red Matter is on the jellyfish ship.

"Keep firing" wouldn't work, especially when the weapons are based on the same technology.

Originally posted by Robtard
Only when it's clear you're arguing from ignorance. Which is often lately.

Great, you googled a little bit of info. Zefram Cochran was played by the farmer from Babe. You know all the important stuff now and can debate.

Now plagiarize some from non canon sources some more, that's special.

No. This bit of yours is growing quite stale.

Supported my opinion so quit crying bout it.

The article actually supports the Original universe argument more than your own, so there is that to consider.

Originally posted by -Pr-
The article actually supports the Original universe argument more than your own, so there is that to consider.

Originally posted by -Pr-
The article actually supports the Original universe argument more than your own, so there is that to consider.

You didn't really except him to understand the non-canon source he used, did you?

Originally posted by Silent Master
You didn't really except him to understand the non-canon source he used, did you?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I used it to merely add to the Cube has limits. You agreed so there's that.

You say that like it was some grand revelation. Nobody ever said it didn't have limits. You just threw a fit because people dared to say it could stand up to your precious Nerada.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You didn't really except him to understand the non-canon source he used, did you?

Nope; and of course he's still refusing to concede, but why am I not surprised.