Originally posted by quanchi112
Just as the human woman shot him it proves he is not that fast nor are his reactions accurately as fast you claim unless you cherry pick a few scenes.
No Quan, all that proves is that he didn't care about .45 calibur bullets from a 20th century weapon that did him no harm. But go ahead, claim that he couldn't dodge them, despite him didging superior weaponry elsewhere... 🙄
Originally posted by quanchi112
We see him do so here with everything on the line. You want to make excuses. Not how we do things on kmc.
we've seen him in... what, 2 fight scenes, 1 he gets taken by a surprise attack, and one where he has his emo chip on and flesh injury, pain which was a brand new sensation to him. Way to cherry pick, you dishonest prick.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Watch the film. We see him run and move far faster than any human. The only one who can kind of keep up is someone far superior to a human in the half human/half Vulcan Spock. Kirk could not even harm Khan in any way. Khan is superior to humans in every way. Its a basic point of the film which escapes you. Not surprising.
Not a single piece of evidence presented, just assertions from you. Please, do go on braying.
Unless and until you can post evidence and actually QUANTIFY it, then you have no case to make demands of anyone.
Deja Vu if I have ever had it.... This is the exact same circus wheel you have been spinning since the Akuma vs Shao Kahn thread... Demanding evidence, but providing none, and not bothering to do any research.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I did not choose one showing here. The borg's entire portrayal in that film was slow. Data was slow in the entire film as well. If you want to say Data is very fast how many feats would you say accurately represents that let's say in a percentage.
The borg exist outside of that movie you raging dolt. As does Data.
And considering Data has displayed vastly superhuman speed (among other capabilities) in just about every episode he has been in, I could give you figures that vary wildly, especially when you factor in your Quan Logic regarding what is and is not applicable like you did earlier with his keypad typing.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Being dishonest during a debate is your thing not mine. Unlike you I debate and bring forth evidence.
Bukllshit, you post clips and then arbitrarily say things that never occurred and proceed to make shit up to suit your own ends. That's the very definition of dishonest debating practice.