Wonder Woman Vs Thor

Originally posted by Nibedicus
I think it's due to the planet pulling "feat".

Superman at full strength is seen as a planet-puller and thus WW's sharing of the "feat" could be categorized as a "non-feat" due to the unknown (possibly majority) portion of the "feat" Superman contributed in. Making the "feat" questionable at the least. Even when using Abhi's interpretation of it and discounting celey's point.

Ah, okay.

Guys, leave Superman out of it. This'll turn in to a Superman V Thor thread otherwise.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
And he did. She said they won't regain their strength in time to be a threat but Etrigan (Like Batman pointed out) bought them the time.

I uploaded that scan myself but I'm not sure how that's relevant even if it was your scan? You're like a ten year old.

Which brings us back to the heart of the thread. What strength feats of Diana put her clearly above Thor?

This mainly for Abhi since he seems to be a firm believer of Wondy > Thor in strength.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Which brings us back to the heart of the thread. What strength feats of Diana put her clearly above Thor?

This mainly for Abhi since he seems to be a firm believer of Wondy > Thor in strength.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
I think it's due to the planet pulling "feat".

Superman at full strength is seen as a planet-puller and thus WW's sharing of the "feat" could be categorized as a "non-feat" due to the unknown (possibly majority) portion of the "feat" Superman contributed in. Making the "feat" questionable at the least. Even when using Abhi's interpretation of it and discounting celey's point.

It is not a "non-feat" just because you can't quantify exactly which portion of the earth she was pulling. [Italics added to emphasize the point that she was helping to pull the flipping earth.] I don't think it matters in the supposed WW > Thor argument though b/c I'm certain Thor has better feats.

I am curious though. Prior to Nu52, did Clark have any solo planet pulling/bench pressing feats?

Originally posted by Sasaraixx
It is not a "non-feat" just because you can't quantify exactly which portion of the earth she was pulling. [Italics added to emphasize the point that she was helping to pull the flipping earth.] I don't think it matters in the supposed WW > Thor argument though b/c I'm certain Thor has better feats.

I am curious though. Prior to Nu52, did Clark have any solo planet pulling/bench pressing feats?

Not really. Morrison would have had him push the moon, but ended up giving that to Ellectric Blue Supes.

I think it was Trinity that had him push an entire solar system, but it was miniaturized and growing. He never handled them at full size.

Warworld push doesn't count, as he was amped.

Edit: Anyone here know anything about Superman ripping up a moon sized hunk of Earth? I presume they meant "Earths moon" when they said it, and not some tiny moon.. That's one feat that kept being mentioned around the web, but I've never seen scans, and don't know the issue/context.

Originally posted by Sasaraixx
It is not a "non-feat" just because you can't quantify exactly which portion of the earth she was pulling. [Italics added to emphasize the point that she was helping to pull the flipping earth.] I don't think it matters in the supposed WW > Thor argument though b/c I'm certain Thor has better feats.

I am curious though. Prior to Nu52, did Clark have any solo planet pulling/bench pressing feats?

It's a "non-feat" because Superman has been strongly debated or at the very least perceived on the forum as a planet puller on his own. Usually by the same ppl who argue on WW's behalf w/ regards to this "feat".

The fact that Superman is a "solo planet puller" means that he could have pulled anywhere between some or ALL of the weight himself.

Kinda like me pulling a 10 ton boulder via cables alongside a bulldozer. I can "claim" that I pulled a 10 ton boulder, but it's pretty much a "non-feat" at this point.

Tho, I DO agree much of what you say and if the same posters concede these possibility that pre-DCnU Superman's strength is not "planetary" then I am more than willing to re-evaluate my perception on how the "feat" measures what WW can do.

Personally, tho, I've always seen pre-DCnU Superman to be planetary in strength and it would require more knowledgeable posters than I to change that perception.

I saw this fight in a xxx comic.

What?

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Which brings us back to the heart of the thread. What strength feats of Diana put her clearly above Thor?

This mainly for Abhi since he seems to be a firm believer of Wondy > Thor in strength.

Stop lying celey. I never said diana is stronger than thor. I believe they are roughly comparable in strength.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Pretty much.

Yes, time that the Witch did not foresee them having so I have no idea why you think her assessment still stands?

Originally posted by abhilegend
facepalm

Stop lying celey. I never said diana is stronger than thor. I believe they are roughly comparable in strength.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Your using of a scan where superman was still weakened as a proof that they were restored is laughable at best. Don't back peddle now.

Who's back peddling? Do you seriously not understand what I just explained?

Well whatever, think what you want, everyone already saw what I posted and understood my point. 🙂

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Who's back peddling? Do you seriously not understand what I just explained?

Well whatever, think what you want, everyone already saw what I posted and understood my point. 🙂

And everyone agreed with it minus ABHI.

Originally posted by carver9
And everyone agreed with it minus ABHI.

The majority opinion isn't in of itself the correct one. That being said Abhil needs to heed the words of Rayland:

If you run into an assh*le in the morning, you ran into an assh*le. If you run into assh*les all day, you're the assh*le.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Who's back peddling? Do you seriously not understand what I just explained?

Well whatever, think what you want, everyone already saw what I posted and understood my point. 🙂

Who is everyone here? Superman was obviously weakened there. You presented that scan as if Etrigan buying them "some time" restored them when it was blatantly obvious that it wasn't the case by the same scan. That's why I asked, do you even read bro?

Originally posted by abhilegend
facepalm

Stop lying celey. I never said diana is stronger than thor. I believe they are roughly comparable in strength.

You've been trying to spread ure Wondy > Thor in strength propaganda for quite a while now.

U've brought up this point in multiple threads. Perfect example is this thread itself. Look at who created it? You!! Not my fault it's backfiring.

Lawlz.. 😆

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Now you're back-peddling. There would be absolutely no reason for me to lie about it.

You've been trying to spread ure Wondy > Thor in strength propaganda for quite a while now.

U've brought up this point in multiple threads. Perfect example is this thread itself. Look at who created it? You!! Not my fault it's backfiring.

Lawlz.. 😆

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Now you're back-peddling. There would be absolutely no reason for me to lie about it.

You've been trying to spread ure Wondy > Thor in strength propaganda for quite a while now.

U've brought up this point in multiple threads. Perfect example is this thread itself. Look at who created it? You!! Not my fault it's backfiring.

Lawlz.. 😆

Originally posted by carver9
And everyone agreed with it minus ABHI.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Quote one post then where I said diana>Thor in strength. I dare you.