Khan Noonien Singh vs. Yoda

Started by quanchi112201 pages

Re: I would appreciate it if you would keep track of things.

Originally posted by XanatosForever
I know there are a lot of people posting, but I am still expecting your participation here. Without your input, there is not much to debate. We are nearing closing arguments, anyway, it seems. Your posts feel less invested than they were earlier.

He cannot because, per your modus operandi, we do not seem him pull both triggers at the same time. He must either pull the trigger to the repeating weapon, or angle the cannon and then pull the trigger to fire it.

He does an admirable job of using both weapons, switching between them skilfully when the situation arises. Given the disparaging weight and shape of his two weapons, are you certain it would be less difficult for him to fire them simultaneously? Even if you do not, Khan must think so, or else why would he not use the tactical advantage of wielding both guns at once?

Yoda survives wartime, trains a new generation, which leads to the fall of the Sith. That sounds more like a success to me. Your personal opinions of the character do not change the canon.

Continue?
1

A reasonable person can assume he can pull both triggers at the same time. You can pretend he can't because unlike me you're unreasonable.

Yoda hides on a barren world. It's like leaving the city and hiding in a tent. Not really proving anything other than running like a coward. Khan brought the fight to the Federation.

Originally posted by The Scenario
Apologize for being completely honest with you? When I told you that I was just making a point?

You really should look up Reductio ad Absurdum. Also, calm down.

Anyway, did Khan shoot the ground?

Until you apologize for being a scumbag I can't answer your questions on principle.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
No, because we see Khan's shots hit walls and floors, despite your denial and contradictory asspulls.

Nobody has ever called you that besides your imaginary friends.

A hyperbolic statement from a fallible character and your beer goggled view of a clip that anyone with a rational mind can also see and come to a completely different conclusion. Your supposed evidence is completely invalidated by what that proof actually proves, dumbass.

Then it's not out debating, it's arguing a lost cause. Like trying to prove you have a rational mind.

Wrong. I destroyed your theory and annihilated Scenarios pride and dignity. I'd say you're up next but you're too much of a coward to actually debate anything for long before the next breakdown comes.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
I won 40 some pages ago.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Until you apologize for being a scumbag I can't answer your questions on principle.
Originally posted by quanchi112
...This is about Khan vs. Yoda. Stay on point you emotional wreck.

Originally posted by The Scenario
You violated my high ethical standards I adhere to for debating. This is your punishment.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You violated my high ethical standards I adhere to for debating. This is your punishment.
Originally posted by quanchi112
...This is about Khan vs. Yoda. Stay on point you emotional wreck.

Did Khan shoot the ground?

Originally posted by The Scenario
Did Khan shoot the ground?
Until you apologize I will not answer your questions.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Until you apologize I will not answer your questions.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Concession accepted.

Originally posted by The Scenario
You are essentially conceding by not apologizing.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You are essentially conceding by not apologizing.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Concession Accepted.
Originally posted by quanchi112
...This is about Khan vs. Yoda. Stay on point you emotional wreck.

1. There is a 'Report' button. If you feel a rule has been broken, that is what it is there for.

2. There is an 'Ignore' function. If you do not wish to speak to me, that is what it is there for.

3. Did Khan shoot the ground?

Originally posted by quanchi112
At no point did I compare it to my battlezone. I simply destroyed his theory that one cannot outdebate the other and lose. He has a very small mind.

You did so by using a the Thor/LT comparison in retrospect to the Russell/Dorf comparison. Thor being equated with Russell and Dorf being equated with the Tribunal. Horrendous day, the day you brought shame upon Russell Edgington.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I outdebated him. This is about Khan vs. Yoda. Stay on point you emotional wreck.

You didn't. Yoda wins. Concession accepted, troll.

Originally posted by The Scenario
1. There is a 'Report' button. If you feel a rule has been broken, that is what it is there for.

2. There is an 'Ignore' function. If you do not wish to speak to me, that is what it is there for.

3. Did Khan shoot the ground?

I do not report. Its weakness. Khan wins. Until you say you're sorry I won't answer your questions.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
You did so by using a the Thor/LT comparison in retrospect to the Russell/Dorf comparison. Thor being equated with Russell and Dorf being equated with the Tribunal. Horrendous day, the day you brought shame upon Russell Edgington.

You didn't. Yoda wins. Concession accepted, troll.

No, he said it was impossible to not win and outdebate at the same time. I gave a clear example to prove my point. I at no point compared it to my battlezone. You're a liar.

Khan wins based off the evidence, flip flopper.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, he said it was impossible to not win and outdebate at the same time. I gave a clear example to prove my point. I at no point compared it to my battlezone. You're a liar.

Khan wins based off the evidence, flip flopper.


Your admission of Digi's statements means that Ganondorf is so much more powerful than Russell that no matter how good the debater is, they can never win the debate. You yourself provided the Thor/LT example as an analogy to the Russell/Dorf comparison. You brought disgrace upon your fave.

Yoda has already won. The movies and your own thread polls agree with me.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I do not report. Its weakness. Khan wins. Until you say you're sorry I won't answer your questions.

Know what else you can do?

http://youtu.be/FMNJuSl91qY?t=8s

Why won't you apologize to me for your lies? And did Khan shoot the ground?

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Your admission of Digi's statements means that Ganondorf is so much more powerful than Russell that no matter how good the debater is, they can never win the debate. You yourself provided the Thor/LT example as an analogy to the Russell/Dorf comparison. You brought disgrace upon your fave.

Yoda has already won. The movies and your own thread polls agree with me.

I gave an example of how it is possible. You barely ever comprehend anything.

Khan wins. Quit derailing and get a life. You are obsessed with mine.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I gave an example of how it is possible. You barely ever comprehend anything.

Khan wins. Quit derailing and get a life. You are obsessed with mine.


You conceded that there was a power gap of several tiers between them with your Thor/LT analogy. You're the Russell-betrayer.

Yoda wins based off the movies and your own thread polls. 53-2-1. This spite thread needs to be closed.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
You conceded that there was a power gap of several tiers between them with your Thor/LT analogy. You're the Russell-betrayer.

Yoda wins based off the movies and your own thread polls. 53-2-1. This spite thread needs to be closed.

No, I said it is possible and used this clear example.

No, he loses since he was easily ko'd by a slow Palpatine blast. Movies, kid.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I said it is possible and used this clear example.

No, he loses since he was easily ko'd by a slow Palpatine blast. Movies, kid.


You conceded with your analogy of Thor/LT. That's a huge power gap.

He wins because of superior feats and your thread polls. 53-2-1. Spite thread's gotta be closed.