Originally posted by CosmicComet
They aren't human, yet have identical bone structure and strength under a particular atmosphere. This is reason enough.Besides this, the only reason I proposed the lower durability for her is to keep things simple, as I assumed most would adhere to that logic here naturally.
Would I have been more reasonable to have simply assumed her durability was equal to the feat Kal had shown? I could have, but that would have required me to say that her durability is in all likelihood superior to what the Hulk showed. And that opens another can of worms where we would try to go around prove one or the other. In this case, for the scale we're talking about, it was simply easier to assume parity in that field for the sake of coming to a conclusion in other areas of the fight where things aren't so murky; such as strength, speed and reflexes.
And again, she did not seem to still be dazed when the projectile hit her, she seemed to feel the effects for a few seconds at most.
Your point being? They aren't human, they probably aren't even mammalian as we understand that classification. Basing their strength/durability difference simply on their respective sex is...strange to speak the least.
How would you know that? Especially considering the fact that she was supposed to be a genetically engineered supersoldier of her race iirc.
We have already established her powers weren't as well developed as Zod and Kal's. You can use this to validate the claim that Superman had better durability than her. Using human sexual dimorphism simply goes against objective analysis of their respective capabilities.