Originally posted by Supermutant
lol now they are "exact replicas" like that makes a different. These featless "exact replicas" who didn't show any kind of ability to use chi or any fighting skill suppose to equal the real deal. lol And its on you to prove that these "replicas" are equal to Shang in any way.
They were exact replicas. Do you know what that means?
Now this is an excuse. Even though in the actual on panel fights it would make zero sense for her to lose on purpose. By the way if she was being mind controlled then she wouldn't have been able to let anything. If she wasn't being mind controlled then that 3 on panel 1-shots on 3 different occasions by 3 different opponents. So which is it?
That's what the comics show and she defeated Batman in one panel after that.
So no, it's not an excuse.
😂 at you mentioning context. Plus Shang has other fight feats like easily defeating Crossbones, easily 1-shotting Falcon, beating down Paladin who had just taken down Cap America, stalemating Iron Fist, even a mind controlled Shang was getting the upper hand on Danny recently as oppose to getting 1-shotted. Even in his defeat by Gorgon, Shang showed the ability to amp himself in mid battle quickly and take a great amount of punishment.
Yeah he has sub Batman level feats. None of these suggests he can defeat Batman in one panel.
Do you want me to post Batman's feats?
And by the way my stance from the beginning has been that either could defeat the other. My issue is with those who think this is a stomp on either side. There has been zero evidence to show that this would be a stomp when both characters entire history is look at. A character beating Batman doesn't mean that said character is thereby unbeatable, that horrible debating. Shiva has lost to less than Batman as well and stalemated by less.
This isn't a stomp but Shang isn't winning this.