Originally posted by curryman
Like I just explained through PMs now, all of the stuff that has been allowed has been allowed for a reason. The stuff that might seemingly be inconsistent with the rules, has already been thoroughly discussed and explained in PM.With Leo's match, like with Digi's amalgam earlier, people casting doubt on something that I had allowed basically starts this process;
1. It partially lessens people trust in my competence as a Tourney Host.
2. It temporarily makes me doubt my own decision.
3. It forces me to dig through 40 pages of PMs to find the messages where said decision was discussed, and the participants explanations (All of which have been satisfactory).
4. It diverts attention away from the actual Amalgam vs Amalgam debate, the very focus/purpose of this tournament.
5. It seeds dissatisfaction between the participants in the sense that the one who voiced a concern/complaint does not get his way, and the other participants feelings towards the actual business of complaining.
6. It creates a mess for the judges.
Please trust in the decisions that I have made and know these two things;
- Every participant has already explained everything to me very thoroughly.
- I have made no decision without carefully considering them first.
well said. 👆
(Leo you damn cowboy, don't interrupt Abhi and Digi's lovemaking) [/B]
i know, i know. but seriously--GRANDPA! i literally LOL'd. i'd vote for abhi on that crack alone. 😄
old school smack talk ftw. 👆
ps--no one better get any ideas about throwing the grandpa label THIS way.... sneer