Its rage who needs calming down here.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Calm down, I know that you're still mad because Superman needed an exception to be made in order to lift Mjolnir, because he wasn't worthy enough to lift it on his own.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Nah, she is worried that Superman would probably end this whole arc himself. It wasn't a feat from Thor but for avengers anyway. Superman's skin>Adamantine after all.http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/16230202/aj-02-06.jpg.html Lawlz.
He said they wouldn't be down for long means that they were knocked out. Making all sort of excuses and shit? Superman was barely standing there, huh?
Doesn't makes it any less canon to DC.
Yes. Yeah.
You aren't even making any sense. Go tell that to an Olympian fan, I give no f*cks.
Now that looks more like lightning. It's two separate bolts cascading down on John while this is just a trail:
How can the entire thing be canon for DC if it automatically excludes anything from Marvel? There can't be the collection of artifacts, there can't be the crossworld interactions etc. But whatever, I'm glad you think Marvel characters can easily replicate Kryptonite to take down Superman.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
You aren't even making any sense. Go tell that to an Olympian fan, I give no f*cks.Now that looks more like lightning. It's two separate bolts cascading down on John while this is just a trail:
How can the entire thing be canon for DC if it automatically excludes anything from Marvel? There can't be the collection of artifacts, there can't be the crossworld interactions etc. But whatever, I'm glad you think Marvel characters can easily replicate Kryptonite to take down Superman.
Like I said I disagree. If you think Superman just took a straight up charged mjolnir strike and was only knocked down, more power to you.
It doesn't exclude everything from marvel, they can't just directly reference it. The other team was mentioned too which means everything happened. Only if both DC and marvel universes are combined and Lex tells them the formula of kryptonite.
Originally posted by abhilegend
That was just sarcasm bro. Chill out.Like I said I disagree. If you think Superman just took a straight up charged mjolnir strike and was only knocked down, more power to you.
It doesn't exclude everything from marvel, they can't just directly reference it. The other team was mentioned too which means everything happened. Only if both DC and marvel universes are combined and Lex tells them the formula of kryptonite.
So was I.
Okay, alright. Like I said, Superman was losing that hand to hand exchange until he resorted to heat vision.
So how does it mean it can all be included? No, it means another team was reference. You need to stop extrapolating so much. Lex told them the radiation wavelength. Something someone with Cosmic Awareness for example, can easily deduce.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
So was I.Okay, alright. Like I said, Superman was losing that hand to hand exchange until he resorted to heat vision.
So how does it mean it can all be included? No, it means another team was reference. You need to stop extrapolating so much. Lex told them the radiation wavelength. Something someone with Cosmic Awareness for example, can easily deduce.
Nah, getting knocked down isn't losing a fight by any means especially when one guy is swinging a charged hammer which the other guy is weak to. By an all out thor while superman was still holding back.
Everything that occured in JLA/Avengers that wasn't marvel property was directly referenced but suddenly there is a different team than Avngers was referenced? What kind of logic is that?
They still need to merge the DC and Marvel universes for the radiation to work against superman. Good luck with that.
Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm glad you admit that one strike from Thor was enough to put Superman on his back for mulitple panels.
Originally posted by abhilegend
You didn't seem to be using sarcasm.Nah, getting knocked down isn't losing a fight by any means especially when one guy is swinging a charged hammer which the other guy is weak to. By an all out thor while superman was still holding back.
Everything that occured in JLA/Avengers that wasn't marvel property was directly referenced but suddenly there is a different team than Avngers was referenced? What kind of logic is that?
They still need to merge the DC and Marvel universes for the radiation to work against superman. Good luck with that.
Can you read my mind?
He was at the disadvantage. Not too long ago you were arguing how Superman isn't weak to blunt force objects that are magic.....
They referenced another team. Almost certainly talking about the Avengers, but that doesn't mean to the DC Universe, everything occurred exactly the same after the crossover was finished.
Who says they have to merge? Besides, according to forum rules, battles take place in a neutral Universe.
Originally posted by abhilegendI've been looking at alot of his post and I'm 98% positive that Silent Master is mentally retarded
Its rage who needs calming down here.
Your feeble attempts of baiting are amusing. You've lost your touch.
That said, Thor is massively overrated here and Majestic drops him like a sac of bricks.
Originally posted by snowdragon
Abhilegend is to superman as battlehammer was to wolverine, once it starts there is no stopping it.This thread is about Majestros strength vs Thor and here it is whittled to superman vs thor.
Majestros>Thor slightly in strength, Superman has nothing to do what that at all.
Wait.
You mean this thread has become about Superman?!
Originally posted by chronickle
I've been looking at alot of his post and I'm 98% positive that Silent Master is mentally retardedThat said, Thor is massively overrated here and Majestic drops him like a sac of bricks.
If you're going to insult someone's intelligence, you might want to proof read your posts before hitting the submit button.
I believe you mean, "a lot" and "sack of bricks".
Originally posted by abhilegendYes, really. If Marvel cannot specifically reference the crossover, and/or any of the DC characters associated with the crossover without being sued by DC, then clearly Marvel does not(or rather, cannot) recognize it as canon. That said, absolutely nothing from that event is canon to Thor-- nothing/nada/zip/zlich/zero. Therefore, Superman's battle with Thor cannot be canon to Superman either-- remember, canonicity has to work both ways before it becomes admissible as evidence.
Not really. Its fully canon to DC but they couldn't reference marvel characters directly too.
Crikey, I didn't think I'd be instructing a "canonicity 101" class today. g007-psyduck
__________
Aside from that, the forum rules make it very clear that JLA/Avengers is NOT usable on this forum for some of the very same reasons I just mentioned:
No Non-canon Sources
Non-canon sources are invalid for evidence. With rare exceptions, comics not in continuity such as Elseworlds, What Ifs, or alternate universes are not used for evidence in debates of a particular mainstream character.A canon source is one that is regarded as being 'in continuity'. In the example of Star Trek; instances from the series and movies can be used, but books are definitely out. Comic book crossovers are usually unusable as they ignore common sense most of the time (DC vs. Marvel is certainly unusable in some cases in our debates!).
This includes JLA/Avengers. Canon or not, people just aren't going to agree on it in most cases. Besides, there should be plenty of other comics with which to make your point.
Comics released strictly online or on web sites will not be considered proof in the Comic Book Versus Forum.
An obscure interview given by someone involved in a story arc is not proof to refute feats. Neither is a random post by a supposed writer on a message board, blogs, tweets, etc. There have been too many of these so called interviews which go against what's shown on panel. Especially when there is no dialogue to refute what's happening on panel. Most writers are clear with the intentions of the plot and story arc.
This principle extends to characters with multiple versions, alternate timelines, etc. Unless specified by the thread starter, only current-version canon feats are allowed.
...Thus your argument is utterly moot either way. So just... Stop..?
Originally posted by Galan007
Yes, really. If Marvel cannot specifically reference the crossover, and/or any of the DC characters associated with the crossover without being sued by DC, then clearly Marvel does not(or rather, cannot) recognize it as canon. That said, absolutely nothing from that event is canon to Thor-- nothing/nada/zip/zlich/zero. Therefore, Superman's battle with Thor cannot be canon to Superman either-- remember, canonicity has to work both ways before it becomes admissible as evidence.Crikey, I didn't think I'd be instructing a "canonicity 101" class today. g007-psyduck
__________
Aside from that, the forum rules make it very clear that JLA/Avengers is NOT usable on this forum for some of the very same reasons I just mentioned:
...Thus your argument is utterly moot either way. So just... Stop..?
