Nolan's Superhero Films

Originally posted by Kotor3
I really do not understand your reasoning.

Do you know the difference between accidental death and intent to kill?

Burton’s Batman killed not by accident, it was intentional, that is why even the Joker said you drop me.

TDK, he rushes to save a boy and Dent dies from the fall that he himself later endures. However, when the Joker felled and it was in his power to save him he did unlike his actions in BB when he faced a similar situation.

TDK and TDKR Batman was not the same one in BB, the persona of the two were different.

He was willing to kill, intentionally or otherwise, to save a life.

And Talia? And the nameless guy driving?

Originally posted by juggerman
He was willing to kill, intentionally or otherwise, to save a life.
And Talia? And the nameless guy driving?

Obliviously, you and some others have a different understanding than I do of the meaning of the word intent.

Meaning of Intent to Kill: The will or purpose with which one does an act.

In all of Nolan’s movies Batman only intended for one person to die and that was Ra’s al Ghul. Everyone else died from circumstantial situation.

Dent – Batman intended to stop Dent from killing the child. His intent was not to kill Dent. Dent was near a cliff and when Batman rush him he happen to die from the fall. (Those were the circumstances and situation)

Same for Talia.

I really do not know what more I can say on this subject. Nolan’s Batman and Burton’s are nowhere near the same.

Originally posted by juggerman
He was willing to kill, intentionally or otherwise, to save a life.

And Talia? And the nameless guy driving?

Originally posted by Kotor3
Obliviously, you and some others have a different understanding than I do of the meaning of the word intent.

Meaning of Intent to Kill: The will or purpose with which one does an act.

In all of Nolan’s movies Batman only intended for one person to die and that was Ra’s al Ghul. Everyone else died from circumstantial situation.

Dent – Batman intended to stop Dent from killing the child. His intent was not to kill Dent. Dent was near a cliff and when Batman rush him he happen to die from the fall. (Those were the circumstances and situation)

Same for Talia.

I really do not know what more I can say on this subject. Nolan’s Batman and Burton’s are nowhere near the same.

but Nolan's Batman and Burton's Batman do not have to be the same

it will be the same for whoever takes over when the Batman reboot happens

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
but Nolan's Batman and Burton's Batman do not have to be the same

it will be the same for whoever takes over when the Batman reboot happens

Who said they did?

How is this point in relevant to this discussion?

Originally posted by Kotor3
Who said they did?

How is this point in relevant to this discussion?

don't know .. don't even care.. im gonna give my opinion whether you like it or not.. any and all discussions are open to all

LOL

Originally posted by Kotor3
LOL

lololololololololol

see anyone can post that smilie, since i have many times..

really don't time for people stuck in a temporal causality loop circa 1978 or 1989

Originally posted by Kotor3

Dent – Batman intended to stop Dent from killing the child. His intent was not to kill Dent. Dent was near a cliff and when Batman rush him he happen to die from the fall. (Those were the circumstances and situation)

Christ,I seem to be the only one that remembers that Batman has a grappling line to swing on & capture crims as well as a cape capable of sustaining his weight & buffering his fall AS SEEN IN BATMAN BEGINS.

Dent did not have to fall to his death or Batman sustain his injuries if either hook or cape was utilised.

Originally posted by Esau Cairn
Christ,I seem to be the only one that remembers that Batman has a grappling line to swing on & capture crims as well as a cape capable of sustaining his weight & buffering his fall AS SEEN IN BATMAN BEGINS.

Dent did not have to fall to his death or Batman sustain his injuries if either hook or cape was utilised.

hahahaha.. Batman had absolutely no time to take out his grapple gun.. he made a split second choice to save a child's life

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
hahahaha.. Batman had absolutely no time to take out his grapple gun.. he made a split second choice to save a child's life

And yet you have no answer nor insight to why Batman didn't utilise his cape to buffer his & Dent's fall.

There's a big difference to a couple of broken ribs, maybe a broken back compared to a man's life & then taking the blame for it.

Originally posted by Esau Cairn
And yet you have no answer nor insight to why Batman didn't utilise his cape to buffer his & Dent's fall.

There's a big difference to a couple of broken ribs, maybe a broken back compared to a man's life & then taking the blame for it.

AAHAHAHHAHAHHA.. Do you have insight?? Can you see the future?? hahahhahahahha.. I guess you can;t read the script either,, hahahahhahahahha

Again Batman made a split second decision to save a child's life.. He wasn;t like "Gee I better use my grapple gun so Esau Cairn can be happy" lololololololol hahahahahha

And twice you've totally ignored my questioning of why Batman did not utilise his cape.

Care to evade the question a 3rd time?

Originally posted by Esau Cairn
And twice you've totally ignored my questioning of why Batman did not utilise his cape.

Care to evade the question a 3rd time?

i made no evasion .... hahhahahahahha.. again Batman made a split second decision to save a child's life.. Why you choose to ignore that makes no damn common sense,..

Yup...no response.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO

Yes I'll save a child's life but to hell about that sheer drop afterwards...I simply can't think of anything else in this split second decision I must make....

-CRASH-
*Runs away injured*

What was that thing Lucious said about my cape having "Memory Fiber"...maybe I could've glided down like I did in that previous movie?

Originally posted by Esau Cairn
Yup...no response.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO

no need to even make one.. lolololololol.. you aren;t making any type of sense.. For some unknown unexplained reason you don;t understand/comprehend the simple fact that Batman make a split second decision to save a child's life.. That was his goal, btw, (btw , means by the way). hahahhahahha..
this has been fun, I am missing Sharknado, hahahahahahahahhahahaha.. will return tomorrow to respond

And you are ignoring Batman's training, his gadgets & the capabilities of his costume, more importantly his cape.

Originally posted by Esau Cairn
And you are ignoring Batman's training, his gadgets & the capabilities of his costume, more importantly his cape.

decided to come back on.. hahahahahha

nah, not ignoring a damn thing, that is your department. i know each and everything there is to know about Batman, be it the comic books, graphic novels or movies..

you are the one who keeps whining about stupidness.. since you want to stay in a temporal causality loop go right ahead.. whats next the batsuit should have been red or it should have had bat nipples, hahahahahahahahaha... do you not know what a choice is?????????? Batman HAD TO MAKE A CHOICE.. HE HAD NO TIME TO TO REACH INTO HIS BAG OF TRICKS SO YOU COULD BE HAPPY

BruceSkywalker is probably one of the worst posters on KMC.

Nolan's "superhero" films are good IMO, but I can see why some might not like the more grounded take he has on superheroes.