Originally posted by Firefly218
It seems to me Supes vs Bats is Lex Luthor's origin story. The fact that they cast a young actor for Lex means he'll probably be a villain for multiple movies. A terrible idea considering Bryan Cranston was perfect and jobless
In most continuity nowadays, Lex is around the same age as Superman, so it wouldn't really work.
Originally posted by Femi32
More recent pics of Gal Gadot!
scary skinny
Originally posted by Golgo13
Cranston is too old for the Luthor they want.
not really.. every character is defined on how they are being written, in this case lex is written as someone young and short..
Originally posted by DARTH POWER
My worry here is that there's no movie that's the end goal. They are both just staging something new.Batman V Superman should be the focus as this itself could potentially be one of the biggest movie of all time. But Dawn of Justice is clearly a set up to Justice League.
So then Justice League is the big end goal right? Well no because Justice League is just the platform to launch solo movies for other DC characters which WB doesn't have the confidence to do before JL.
So the only end goal here seems to be a very long route to finally getting other big budget DC character solo movies who aren't called Superman or Batman.
Compare that to Marvel, who had the confidence to go straight in and do 4 Solo movies for 4 different Marvel characters. And it all built up to the Avengers which wasn't a platform for anything else. It was the end goal (of phase I at least) and just ended up being fantastic as a result of all the work they put into that being nothing but a great movie. No build up required, no setting up another franchise. Just an Epic movie. The only movie which was a platform setting up the Avengers was IM2. And we saw how that suffered in quality as a result.
well said..
Originally posted by roughrider
Clark is smart, but not in the same way Bruce is. Clark can be too naive and idealistic, while Bruce is the hardened realist who's willing to play dirty and sneaky to win.
👆
Originally posted by ares834
That's silly. The actor should be cast for the role not the role written for the actor. I do wish we had an older Lex though.
But Cranston is just so damn perfect ranting
Originally posted by -Pr-
Cranston would have sucked as a young Lex Luthor.
But would have been amazing as an older Lex Luthor.
Jesse Eisenberg is a fine choice for young Lex Luthor I guess. But I would have much preferred that they went with an older Lex Luthor. Bryan Cranston could have played a ruthless, kniving, manipulative businessman extremely well. Instead we'll probably get a quirky, smartass kid who turns evil because supes didn't sign his autograph.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Does nobody remember Malcolm in the Middle? [/B]
But Cranston had many roles before Malcolm in the Middle which showcased his versatile acting. Like his roles on the X Files, Matlock, National Lampoons Thanksgiving Family Reunion and even Seinfeld. It's these roles that got him into Breaking Bad.
Eisenberg has played different variations of the same character. I don't think he can pull off threatening or scary.
Originally posted by Firefly218
But Cranston had many roles before Malcolm in the Middle which showcased his versatile acting. Like his roles on the X Files, Matlock, National Lampoons Thanksgiving Family Reunion and even Seinfeld. It's these roles that got him into Breaking Bad.Eisenberg has played different variations of the same character. I don't think he can pull off threatening or scary.
Supposedly hes a bit scary in the double.