Originally posted by Firefly218
Heresay. Gail Simone heard from someone else.Btw, Henry Cavill had terrific credentials before being cast as superman. He led that awesome TV show The Tudors, he did lots of action and drama and he was an established leading man with loads of talent, potential and the right look.
Gal Gadot has never led in any significant project and most of her acting roles have been supporting. Her only notability is as a model, not an actress. She should still get the benefit of the doubt though, but her credentials pale in comparison to Henry Cavills' before superman.
Originally posted by JayDaDon
Cavill had more acting experience. He was getting dat acting work under the radar. Gadot only has fast and the furious. She wasn't bad, but not much was expected from that role. There's less of a guarantee with her.
I don't consider the Tudors and his part in it to be any more valid than Hemsworth in aussie soaps, and yet both men did fine for the most part.
Gadot might not have as much experience, but comic movies are full of people that had no experience in those kinds of roles and did extremely well.