Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Started by quanchi112638 pages

Originally posted by Darth Thor
No end credit scene in any of the screenings so far:

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/batman-vs-superman-will-have-no-end-credits-scene-a6946141.html

"Perhaps this is Zack Snyder's way of further separating DC films from the Marvel Cinematic Universe that is known to add such scenes at the end of their films"

^ Lol he probably shouldn't be trying to separate them!

And you flipped before you even saw the film. Hahahahahahahahahahaha. Fairweather fan.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
It's a nice thing if critics like it, but only fools let critics decide for them.

I mean TDKR also has a ridiculously high score on RT, and you can't tell me that film wasn't met by mixed response from audiences.

Also Superman Returns was praised by critics, but who goes on about that? No one. Because the movie sucked and was a financial failure to boot. The fans spoke through their wallet and didn't care what praise the critics gave it.

Irony as you've been back and forth in the past few days.

An Oscar winning writer can't save a movie with bad direction.

Though that should have already been known. Batman and Robin and A Beautiful Mind had the same writer. 😂

That Chris Terrio namedrop as a trump card, is like dust in the wind now.

It could easily be Terrio/Goyer that ****ed up more than Snyder.

His is glorious already with fans such as playa before seeing the film saying fire Snyder. Faithless rabble. Love it.

The review vlogs I've watched thus far have stated the main issues are the scene cut choices, overall story, and lack of motivation for most of the characters involved sans Batman. Also, most reviews I've watched hated Eisenberg as Lex and said he was basically Nicolas Cage as a Mad Scientist. They all, however, say that Affleck absolutely kills it as Batman.

Hahah Nic Cage as a mad scientist oh DC you guys are idiots. The best part is playa, Golgo etc. have vehemently defended the choice who looks outright terrible just at face value.

I also defended the choice to cast Ben affleck and laughed at the over reactions when this was first announced. I'm like a modern day prophet.

Even with the lack of post-credit scene, there is one thing this movie has that the Marvel movies don't.

Spoiler:
Turkish Airlines!

About to watch Collider's review next.

Well this doesn't sound good at all. I'll still watch it but my expectations for this film have been lowered quite a bit: which is a shame considering what the movie has access too. Now I'm worried about SS turning out to be subpar.

Originally posted by MF DELPH
Also, most reviews I've watched hated Eisenberg as Lex and said he was basically Nicolas Cage as a Mad Scientist. They all, however, say that Affleck absolutely kills it as Batman.
Yah, I'm really excited to see Affleck's Batman. Probably going to be the best part of the movie.

John Campea says that Gal Gadot is serviceable, but not great in the role of WW; though he like me, was never excited about her casting choice to begin with.

And Lex being bad? Yah, most reviews I've seen/heard state he's over the top and bad.

Funny cause half of the reactions from fans/audiences was that Jesse Lex was great. That includes John Campea.

But I guess the haters will cling onto "Critical Consensus" now. They must be so relieved now after going quiet through the period of overwhelming positive reactions from fans and audiences.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Funny cause half of the reactions from fans/audiences was that Jesse Lex was great. That includes John Campea.

But I guess the haters will cling onto "Critical Consensus" now. They must be so relieved now after going quiet through the period of overwhelming positive reactions from fans and audiences.

RT around 40 percent. You made your bed now lie in it. He seemed over the top from the previews and he looked awful. That's called failing the eye test and now the reviews are matching most people's initial thoughts on the casting choice.

Wow it's getting even worse reviews than MoS...

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Wow it's getting even worse reviews than MoS...
From what I hear about it parts of the movie are REALLY good. But it's the first third of the movie; as well as some pretty poor writing that really derails it. Also, Lex and Doomsday are, like I feared; the worst parts of the movie.

I'm hoping I like it when I go to see it on Saturday, but some of the reviews (now Collider and some other related affiliates. Waiting on Screen Junkies) that I trust have been mixed (6-7/10) to bad (2/5 to 5/10). A lot of people seem to be hung up on the fact that the film is seemingly humorless and lacks 'fun' which I don't have an issue with. The Raid didn't have humor pretty much at all and it was amazing and pretty much universally praised. I think people may be holding DC's film to a bad standard that all superhero films need to be family friendly, but the plot/story complaints are a bit worrisome.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
From what I hear about it parts of the movie are REALLY good. But it's the first third of the movie; as well as some pretty poor writing that really derails it. Also, Lex and Doomsday are, like I feared; the worst parts of the movie.
Snyder always has visually striking imagery and great action but it rarely seems to result in an actually good movie. 300, sucker punch and MoS are all shit imo, so if this movie follows I will no longer have faith in him to do justice to justice league... I hope I'm wrong though.

Collider, a site I really like and go to for alot of movie news....well, they say that BvS's Batman is "The worst Batman ever" and give the movie a D 🙁 http://collider.com/batman-v-superman-review/

^ That's the first outright negative feedback on Batfleck from the reviews that have started to come out. Hopefully its just a one-off opinion and doesn't turn out to be true.