Galen Marek & Rahm Kota vs Count Dooku & Darth Maul

Scenario 1: Force Only
Scenario 2: Sabers Only
Scenario 3: All Out Deathmatch

Battle takes place in an open arena with no prep time. Which duo comes out on top.

2

Team 1 except in sabers.

Maul > Kota (right?)
Dooku crushes Marek in sabers and takes a majority in all out.

Unless if Marek can tactically deal with the two with his Force abilities instead of the fight diverging into 1 vs. 1's, team 2 wins.

Team 2 in all.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Team 1 except in sabers.

Originally posted by Master Han
Maul > Kota (right?)
Dooku crushes Marek in sabers and takes a majority in all out.

Unless if Marek can tactically deal with the two with his Force abilities instead of the fight diverging into 1 vs. 1's, team 2 wins.

Dooku no way crushes Marek. Mareks lightsaber prowess is 'near perfect' and he's more powerful than Dooku is in the Force.

Maul can't defeat Kota that easily. Kota is a badass and will last longer than Dooku would against Marek. He's comparable in terms of TK:

YouTube video

and can block lightning with his bare hands. Maul isn't pwning him with the Force.

Team 1 wins because of Galen Motherf*cking Marek.

Which Maul is this??!.

If its TPM Maul then Galen/Kota forsure.

That his skills are ''near perfect'' is irrelevant when we see him struggle with Ti, Kota, Brood and pre-prime Vader.

That just makes those guys good.

Which is meaningless as Maul has beaten Vader, and Dooku has beaten Grievous whom destroyed Shaak Ti.

Resurrected Maul =/= Real Maul.*

TFU Shaak Ti =/= CW Shaak Ti.

Besides, Marek won those fights.

* he has real legs for one thing, lol.

lol. Just changes the way he fights, not his skills.

I meant more literally, we don't know if they are actually the same person. It is unknown whether that Maul was created through cloning techniques, or through other means. The Prophets themselves stated that "there are techniques to mold a being in every way." So who knows, but that Maul can't be said to be equivalent to the real one with certainty.

Uh, unless you've proof that there's a difference...

Let's do it another way: ANH Vader and ANH Kenobi were complete equals. Maul is better than ANH Kenobi.

You're the one claiming it shows that Mareks below Maul, its your job to prove that claim.

Vader diminished from TFU to that point. Also lolwut?

Team 2, Kota is the weakest link.

Originally posted by Nephthys
You're the one claiming it shows that Mareks below Maul, its your job to prove that claim.

Vader diminished from TFU to that point. Also lolwut?

No he didn't?

Yeah why would Vader's power diminsh in a couple of years from TFU to ANH?

Also clones can be different, but there's no reason to believe Maul's clone was actually more powerful than TCW Maul. It actually seemed the writer's intention was for the clone to be a carbon copy of TPM Maul.

Yeah. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Vader say that Marek's clone shared the same strengths and weaknesses of the original Marek?