Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Infighting/betrayals have led to downfall of even greatest Sith Lords in galactic history (Sidious included).Vitiate didn't schemed to take over Republic for over 1300 years; do not make absurd claims. He had plans to attack the Republic but he waited for lot of reasons.
Yes, he waited, and plotted for the opportune moment to strike. And he failed.
1. Sidious grew up in the Republic; Plagueis deserves credit for recognizing Sidious's potential in the dark side and making him his apprentice.
Good for him.
2. Republic had disbanded its military forces after the (presumed) elimination of Sith.
No. It had disbanded its army, but it still possessed a navy powerful enough to make Nute Gunray shit his pants, whereas Palpatine started with no military whatsoever.
3. Republic became corrupted during a span of thousand years of peace as corporations grew powerful and organized crimes spread; Sidious took advantage of this corruption by participating in politics under guidance of Plagueis.
If you were a betting man, you'd bet on the thousand-year-old dictator with his own sizable empire and military, not on the guy trying to take advantage of a corrupt government.
4. Jedi Order grew out of touch of its natural ways during a span of thousands of years of peace. On top of this, the unbalancing of The Force by joint actions/rituals of Plagueis and Sidious further clouded the judgment of the Jedi. These developments led to disillusionment of Dooku and his eventual fall to the dark side.
Sidious and Plagueis unbalanced the Force through their own actions; it hardly counts as a circumstance in their favor.
5. Some systems of the Republic began to revolt due to wide-spread corruption and neglect and this made it possible for Sidious to support the separatists movement and sow seeds of civil war within the Republic. However, Republic needed its own army as well, so Sidious ordered the creation of a Republic military made of clones (real humans wouldn't need to die) to counter the threat of separatists.
Yes, he took advantage of opportune circumstances. Vitiate had plenty more. The Jedi Order was arguably closer to extinction than it had ever been in KOTOR II, for example, yet Vitiate had not developed an intelligence network of any repute, and so failed to capitalize on it.
Sidious was an EVIL GENIUS for sure but he had proper guidance, luck and fortune on his side as well. Due to combination of various factors, Sidious managed to transform the Republic in to a galactic Sith Empire. However, he also fell in a span of few decades afterwards.
At least he created one at all; Vitiate failed.
In comparison to Sidious, Vitiate was entirely self-made; he didn't needed politics and tutorship of another Sith Lord to plan his rise to great power. In-fact, Vitiate was also a natural leader; established a highly advanced civilization of his own, managed it well, kept it safe and shaped it in to a superpower.
Help from Ragnos aside, Vitiate had significantly more time and resources at his disposal than Palpatine did in the Prequel trilogy, and he still failed..
Vitiate challenged a well-prepared Republic actually and could still won, if some of his own followers had not betrayed him. Jadus, Sajar and Baras rebelled unfortunately. However, Vitiate had a back-up plan as well, should his Empire fail to destroy the Republic. But thanks to Scourge, this plan also failed. Nonetheless, the Empire of Vitiate was disciplined enough to prevent its breakup in his absence and continue its war effort against the Republic to destroy it. History tells us that the Republic actually won but this was not due to incompetence of Vitiate.
That he could not detect Scourge's treachery after 3 centuries speaks for itself.
Thanks to disastrous consequences of infighting/betrayals. Try to look at the whole picture instead of finding excuses to belittle Vitiate's accomplishments.
LOL, the fact that he failed is proof enough; the fault is on only him if he failed to adequately anticipate betrayals in an empire full of sith.
Keep in mind that Sidious also failed against what he described as "insignificant rebellion."
Yes, but he still succeeded in conquering the galaxy. Vitiate failed. What part of this is so difficult for you to understand?
For you
No, for anyone who realizes that vs. debates compare combat ability, not how many factoids SWL can parrot.
Sidious and Vitiate are in the higher echelons of individuals with galactic reach with their Force abilities.
Vader can choke people from light years away. Yoda, Obi Wan, ESB Luke, and practically every Jedi can sense events and even reach out to one another across the galaxy, even while in hyperspace.
Also, can you list some feats of Luke of galactic scale?
He calls all Jedi across the galaxy to convene in a meeting.
It is hinted in canon sources that Vitiate could pull off Nathema like feat with his own power. Wake-up and read all of my responses in this thread. I don't like to repeat same thing again and again.
"hinted" is why I don't bother to "wake-up", buddy. If Vitiate could do that, the war would already be over.
Correction: only 1 time but he would have taken Revan with him as well. Also, Vitiate cannot really die until his essence is contained.
He barely detected the droid's flamethrower, and had Revan moved swiftly could have died when he was knocked on his ass. Never mind the fact that Scourge's visions told him they stood a good chance of defeating him. Compare this to Sidious, against whom three of the greatest Jedi in history died in seconds.
And Sidious also knows essence transfer.
Sith Sorcery based talents/powers.In-fact, Vitiate possessed all of the prerequisites to summon a Force Storm as well. Should he have learned about this technique, he would have wielded it like a PRO as well.
"should he have"? Too bad for you that "sith sorcery based talents/powers" doesn't compare to "ripping starfleets out of the sky, ravaging planets and teleporting beings light years".
Force storms >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vitiate. Deal with it.
Also, you better worry about potential retcon of DE lore by upcoming movies. If this happens, I will have the last laugh.
😆 Getting desperate here, are we?
Luke > Sidious according to fanon? I am not convinced.
According to fanon? Why the f*ck do you keep parroting this laughably retarded excuse of an argument? Luke > Sidious according to canon, just like how Sidious > Vitiate according to canon. The ironic part of your reply is that you are the one inventing a fanon where such canon sources don't exist. You are trying to argue against the evidence, not me.
I pointed out to you that even The Father and Abeloth have done nothing to match Palpatine's Force Storms. So I am not sure why you feel the need to highlight this ability of Sidious in discussions involving Vitiate. If Force Storm talent is the only criteria to determine power of an individual, then Sidious have no competition in the mythos.
False dilemmas are wonderful, aren't they? Abeloth has done plenty to rival Palpatine's Force storms. Vitiate has not. But I'm curious as to this line of reasoning; are you suggesting that my comparing actual feats and capabilities is not the optimal method of evaluating characters? Would you rather I use your method of making shit up and vaguely extrapolating from myths and legends?
Also, if you think of Vitiate to be beneath even TPM Sidious, you are deluding yourself. Do not expect me to accept your subjective assessments such as these without valid reasons.
Subjective assessments? 😆 It's canon, buddy. The ironic part is that your dismissal of these canons sources is where the subjectivity comes into play. So I suggest you stop arguing against yourself, as you do not only here, but every time you whine about my using "hyperbole", while you obsessively cling to Vitiate's "unleashing the full power of the dark side" in "its purest forms", while feigning indignation when someone calls you out on your quotes' utter irrelevance.
A Sith cannot rule over a Sith Empire without being the STRONGEST individual in it.
More red herrings from you; nobody denies that Vitiate is the most powerful individual in his empire. How does this put him above Palpatine's level? Oh...no, it doesn't.