The Greatest Foe the darkness had ever known...

Started by KuRuPT Thanosi31 pages

It's kinda silly to sit here and read some of these comments like... Yoda isn't a great warrior or hardened battle tested foe... It's just so stupid to even suggest such a thing. Yoda, is guilty like many other heroes and badasses in movies.. that are meant to be an example of how you should be and live your life. When you're super saiyan badass.. you just preach humility and try and avoid fighting at all costs. You're suppose to teach others how to lead their lives with all your wisdom and experience. Yoda is no different than all before him who were molded by this hero being a wise pacifist thing in all forums of entertainment. However, that doesn't mean he's nto badass and a great warrior. He just chooses to preach about the folly of war or fighting etc etc.. but that doesn't mean when push comes to shove he isn't the greatest foe the darkness had ever known. That is exactly what he was. Sids couldn't beat him.. Dooku was played with and couldn't beat him. We're talking about some of the best in the mythos here who looked downright inferior to him or slightly inferior to him. You don't pull tha off without being a badass warrior. Just because he's also a symbol of wisdom.. patience.. humility etc etc.. doesn't change his skills in combat.

If AP started preaching about the violence in football or the dangers of being a RB in the NFL.. does that mean he's not one of the best in the NFL? It's simply a stupid line of thinking without taking in the proper context to the character.

Originally posted by Allankles
That doesn't eliminate Palpatine as a primary suspect. Anyone with common sense would still tag him 'suspect' - he had too much power for one fallible man anyway. So yeah.

The universe is too big for a single centralized government anyway. Peace accords, temporary alliances - these are how things should be run - to check the power of the big powers. Alliance is the best hegemony.

It does according to Mace Windu.

"Mace's jaw locked. 'The only reason Palpatine's not a suspect
is because he already rules the galaxy.'"-ROTS Novel

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
I don't think anyone expects you to meet them halfway, Sidious66. Your username and five years of experience kind of inhibits this expectation.

This is coming from a guy who just a few days ago had Kun as his avatar, and who constantly posts pics that say "Marka solos and pwns all." What is it about my username? You don't see me harping on anyone's username or avatar, because that's just petty shit and I couldn't care less. You and Nai both are acting like teenage girls who harp on little things because you can't prove a point.

Yours and Nai's arguments in this thread have been outright silly and retarded and filled with desperate reaching. If Yoda was capable of defeating Sidious, then why didn't it happen? Why do sources say that Sidious was too powerful for Yoda to defeat? Not saying it's impossible for Yoda to defeat Sidious (it's also not impossible for Sidious to defeat Yoda), but I asked you how he would manage to, and you were incapable of answering. Sorry, but falling several stories from a redirected lightning attack because of being in a disadvantaged position at the time, does not constitute proof that Yoda would have won that battle had the blast taken place on even ground.

Nai has OCD, so he can't resist his urges to argue against a character he despises no matter how silly his arguments are. But what's your excuse? Is it because Sidious, even as of ROTS, has the feats to suggest that he would plaster Kun to a wall as easily as he did Maul and Savage?

BTW, I don't mind anyone joking with me about my username or my interest in Sidious, but to use it as an insult just because you're unable to debunk any of my points does get a little frustrating, and it takes the fun out of these discussions. I do enjoy reading some of your posts at times, but sometimes you can be just as petty as Nai.

Whoa, missed that.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
I don't think anyone expects you to meet them halfway, Sidious66. Your username and five years of experience kind of inhibits this expectation.

Given your glass house of a post history, you really shouldn't be throwing stones lol.

Desperate reaching are the side that says Palps faked the entire fight.. that is the epitome of desperate reaching

^I don't even know what to say.

Once again, KT is clueless as to what's being argued here.

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
This is coming from a guy who just a few days ago had Kun as his avatar, and who constantly posts pics that say "Marka solos and pwns all." What is it about my username? You don't see me harping on anyone's username or avatar, because that's just petty shit and I couldn't care less. You and Nai both are acting like teenage girls who harp on little things because you can't prove a point.

Yours and Nai's arguments in this thread have been outright silly and retarded and filled with desperate reaching. If Yoda was capable of defeating Sidious, then why didn't it happen? Why do sources say that Sidious was too powerful for Yoda to defeat? Not saying it's impossible for Yoda to defeat Sidious (it's also not impossible for Sidious to defeat Yoda), but I asked you how he would manage to, and you were incapable of answering. Sorry, but falling several stories from a redirected lightning attack because of being in a disadvantaged position at the time, does not constitute proof that Yoda would have won that battle had the blast taken place on even ground.

Nai has OCD, so he can't resist his urges to argue against a character he despises no matter how silly his arguments are. But what's your excuse? Is it because Sidious, even as of ROTS, has the feats to suggest that he would plaster Kun to a wall as easily as he did Maul and Savage?

BTW, I don't mind anyone joking with me about my username or my interest in Sidious, but to use it as an insult just because you're unable to debunk any of my points does get a little frustrating, and it takes the fun out of these discussions. I do enjoy reading some of your posts at times, but sometimes you can be just as petty as Nai.

I underlined the horrendous butthurt. It didn't take much to set you off but the truth is arguing with you is like arguing with Gideon; a Sisyphean task that's thankless and boring after awhile. You're not convinced by anything, you can't handle a debate without hours upon hours to reply (or days), and even then you just ignore what doesn't fit your worldview, even in defiance of valid arguments cast your way.

But it's truly commendable that in the face of obvious opposition and insult (a single one at that) you lost all inhibition and resorted to degrading arguments that you couldn't begin to touch in the first place, while spouting off absolute arguments in favor of your favorite character with even more gusto. These arguments are so much better when people just conform to their bias at the expense of any kind of rational thought, and chuck out any evidence which doesn't add to that idea:

And Gideon dear, you're in the same boat as Sidious66 here; self-appointed Sidious Defender of KMC. Can you even tell me a time when you said Sidious would lose to anyone? Better yet, can you point to such a time where you said as such and then didn't recant at a later date?

Ah well, it doesn't matter. Both of you deserve each other, and I'm done baiting you two. Enjoy your butthurt together.

Sidious and Yoda are nigh equals...Yoda may have better base stats, but Sidious trumps him due to mindset. It's made clear that the Jedi's mindset not skill is the reason why the Old Jedi Order would never triumph over the New Sith Order.

Moose
And Gideon dear, you're in the same boat as Sidious66 here; self-appointed Sidious Defender of KMC. Can you even tell me a time when you said Sidious would lose to anyone? Better yet, can you point to such a time where you said as such and then didn't recant at a later date?

Ah well, it doesn't matter. Both of you deserve each other, and I'm done baiting you two. Enjoy your butthurt together.

And GideonJanus dear, you're in the same boat as Sidious66Nai here; self-appointed SidiousAncient Sith Defender of KMC. Can you even tell me a time when you said Sidiousthe ancient Sith would lose to anyone? Better yet, can you point to such a time where you said as such and then didn't recant at a later date?

So the new trend is to point out everyones bias?

Originally posted by Intrepid37
So the new trend is to point out everyones bias?

No, of course not.

It's far from new. biscuits

Well the ongoing rage is most pleasing.

That's my line, bro. Get yer own schtick.

^ He's so charismatic.

.gif failure

Your attraction to him in more ways than one... is creepy to say the least.

Don't be so shallow.

This is what happens when I leave. Rampant homosexuality and bitching. It's like I'm watching E!

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Can you even tell me a time when you said Sidious would lose to anyone?

He said he'd lose to Vitiate with prep. 😉

mmm

Where?

I believe you said it in the 'Vitiate with prep vs anyone' thread.

That's terribly suspicious. You're either remembering it wrong or my account was clearly hacked by a heretic and used to espouse heresy.