Darth Vader Vs Mace windu

Started by Petrus15 pages

It's hard to compare speed feats between the two since both have proven to be extremely fast. People who see Vader lacking in speed are a little bit too attached to the OT, maybe.

I honestly don't know who takes this fight. As far as my understanding of Vaapad goes, it makes you as strong as the enemy you're fighting, so the fact that he defeated Sids doesn't mean too much in this fight. Both are supreme combatants.

Originally posted by Petrus
It's hard to compare speed feats between the two since both have proven to be extremely fast. People who see Vader lacking in speed are a little bit too attached to the OT, maybe.

I honestly don't know who takes this fight. As far as my understanding of Vaapad goes, it makes you as strong as the enemy you're fighting, so the fact that he defeated Sids doesn't mean too much in this fight. Both are supreme combatants.

Its not just the OT, its blatantly stated Vader has mobility issues when it comes to dueling. I mean for shits sake he got tagged by ESB Luke. Do people really think he can take Mace Windu?

Originally posted by Intrepid37
Just to prove that Vader is not as slow as everyone thinks.

Generating afterimages of his blade.

http://i42.tinypic.com/2q8by4g.jpg

Moves fast enough to appear as teleporting behind his enemy.

http://i39.tinypic.com/bffj2t.jpg

Forms a shield out of his lightsaber.

http://i39.tinypic.com/2qmdqib.jpg

Kills Roan Lands before Ferus Olin can react.

So you're just going to ignore these speed feats...?

Originally posted by Petrus
So you're just going to ignore these speed feats...?

1. Fighting on par with old Kenobi who is 20 years away from his prime is hardly impressive.

2. A Force user blitzing a non-force user? Am I supposed to be impressed?

3. So...a saber throw.

Come on. These by no means are even close to Mace Windu's 24 blades per second feat.

Well, speed blitzing anyone would be difficult if you have mobility issues... On the other two, he wouldn't be able to move his saber with such efficiency if he were so slow.

I do admit I made an overstatement by saying both are 'extremely fast'. Vader's fast, but probably not Windu fast. I still don't think he'd be by any means easy to defeat.

Originally posted by Lord Stark

Come on. These by no means are even close to Mace Windu's 24 blades per second feat.

Iirc it wasn't stated "per second". And the canonicity of that passage is in question. But I agree in a Saber fight Windu is faster than Vader and would trounce him.

Windu's 24 strikes a second feat?

Somebody care to explain this one.

He appeared to wield a few dozen lightsabers when amped by the mechanics of Vaapad.