DOTNG Orion vs Sundipped Superman OWAW

Started by abhilegend6 pages

Originally posted by operator616
Never said he defeated it by giving him hope. All i said that the end result of all this was superman giving death hope.

The very next page shows that death was fine. So what did superman do exactly? Superman defeated it in the sense that he proved that death is not the master of all things, it's not like he defeated death physically because we see it unharmed exactly 1 page afterwards.

Anyway, i didn't reply to this the 2nd time because i know you'll disagree.


Yes, superman gave Death hope because he learnt something which he wasn't supposed to learn. Happens all the time. It doesn't mean he wasn't beaten. Its like saying just because Darkseid survived after superman beat the shit out of him, he wasn't beaten. Superman defeated Death by just punching him, Death appeared later to him, conceded to him and said he got some hope from superman and that's it.

Except superman beat him physically and that's why Death released him in the first place when he was denying it just one page before superman punched through him and Death didn't concede about psychologically beaten just one page after.

Originally posted by Delta1938
Never saw Abhi claim he defeated it with his fists, simply showing Superman punching through a form of Death trying to kill him. Which, Superman did. It's like when people try to act like it's no big deal Superman burst through SF Darkseid because Darkseid reformed himself immediately after.

Speaking of that, I took what the guy said to Abhi as pretty much that. Death reforming=Superman accomplished nothing.

😕

😒 I hate you Abhi for making me a liar!!! 😠 😠 😠 😠 😠 My next beef dish is dedicated to you. 😒


Even before the previous post, abhi was implying that Superman defeated that Death Entity by punching it. That's the same as saying he beat it with his fists.

No, he merely added context to the feat. That's not him downplaying.

Originally posted by abhilegend
That's good.

How did superman humbling him with his fists and Death admitted that superman defeated him outright means he defeated him by giving him hope?
What context? Superman punched through Death and after that he talked about how superman gave him hope or some crap after admitting [b]superman defeated him
. Before that he was adamant about torturing him forever. He didn't beat it by anything but his fists. [/B]


Operator pointed out that punching him didn't outright defeat him. This isn't the first time you've been caught incorrectly comprehending a comic book to exaggerate the feat(s) of your fave character.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Operator pointed out that punching him didn't outright defeat him. This isn't the first time you've been caught incorrectly comprehending a comic book to exaggerate the feat(s) of your fave character.

Never said he defeated it by giving him hope. All i said that the end result of all this was superman giving death hope.

And you always run your mouth without checking it. He only said that Death reformed in the next page. Also lulz @ not outright defeat him when he outright admitted that superman defeated him.

Originally posted by abhilegend
And you always run your mouth without checking it. He only said that Death reformed in the next page. Also lulz @ not outright defeat him when he outright admitted that superman defeated him.

You have a problem comprehending posts just like you do with comics. He clearly pointed out to you that Superman didn't beat it by punching it. He provided a reason for why that entity believed itself to be beaten by Superman, and it wasn't punching. How is it admitting that it was defeated an indication that it was beaten by superpunches? Or do you have a problem comprehending simple English just like you do forum posts and comics in general?

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
You have a problem comprehending posts just like you do with comics. He clearly pointed out to you that Superman didn't beat it by punching it.
facepalm

You are by far the most clueless poster I've ever met. He outright said Superman beat him by punches, he said Death reformed later.

He provided a reason for why that entity believed itself to be beaten by Superman, and it wasn't punching.
😂

And you caught it without even reading anything about the comic at all.

How is it admitting that it was defeated an indication that it was beaten by superpunches?
Because that's only thing superman did to him.
Or do you have a problem comprehending simple English just like you do forum posts and comics in general?
Just stop. You're now just embarrassing yourself.

Originally posted by abhilegend
facepalm

You are by far the most clueless poster I've ever met. He outright said Superman beat him by punches, he said Death reformed later.

😂

And you caught it without even reading anything about the comic at all.

Because that's only thing superman did to him.


Yes, because words like "Sure he defied death, but didn't really do anything to it" and "The very next page shows that death was fine" clearly scream aloud that "Superman beat him via fisticuffs ftw!!1!1!!". Or it might be another fine example of you being incapable of comprehending basic sentences, which you have shown a particular finesse for in the last couple of posts in this thread.

He explained that it wasn't due to punches. Considering the innumerable times you've been caught in the past lying about feats and making sh1t up, while operator has done so never, don't blame me for being more inclined to trust his word over yours.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Just stop. You're now just embarrassing yourself.

The irony of this isn't lost on me.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Yes, because words like "Sure he defied death, but didn't really do anything to it" and "The very next page shows that death was fine" clearly scream aloud that [b]"Superman beat him via fisticuffs ftw!!1!1!!".
He said Death reformed one page later. He didn't say superman didn't beat him or something.
Or it might be another fine example of you being incapable of comprehending basic sentences, which you have shown a particular finesse for in the last couple of posts in this thread.
Hahaha. Just laughable coming from you.

He explained that it wasn't due to punches.
He explained it wasn't with hope either. So how did superman defeated Death?
Considering the innumerable times you've been caught in the past lying about feats and making sh1t up, while operator has done so never, don't blame me for being more inclined to trust his word over yours.
Considering you've said yourself that operator was acting like galacticstorm and making shit up in past, it shows just how much of a hypocrite you are. Good job riding his arguments though.

The irony of this isn't lost on me. [/B]
There is no irony here, just you riding someone like always. Just like the hypocrisy.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Operator has become the new GalacticStorm. Without all of that Phoenix obsession.

every single one of the superman threads become painful to read.

Originally posted by abhilegend
He said Death reformed one page later. He didn't say superman didn't beat him or something. Hahaha. Just laughable coming from you.

He explained it wasn't with hope either. So how did superman defeated Death? Considering you've said yourself that operator was acting like galacticstorm and making shit up in past, it shows just how much of a hypocrite you are. Good job riding his arguments though.

There is no irony here, just you riding someone like always. Just like the hypocrisy.


He disagreed with your ridiculous claim that Superman punched him to defeat. That's the point which you've been missing so far, although the true reason might be your pitiful reading comprehension issues.

I assure that this is yet another case of your misinterpreting others' posts. For one, that is clearly in reference to his scan-blitz clashes with Mr Master in recent times, which is reminiscent of the Master/GalacticStorm scan wars of old. Secondly I've never accused him once of being dishonest in any way possible. That's another instance of your tendency to lie on top of misinterpreting simple English.

Oh, the irony is certainly there, it is certainly in an overload mode, and it is quite clearly on the part of a certain Superman-fan whom the House of El has already disowned. 👆

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
He disagreed with your ridiculous claim that Superman punched him to defeat. That's the point which you've been missing so far, although the true reason might be your pitiful reading comprehension issues.
Death and the comic disagrees with him and you. That's all that matters. Also no bite for your pitiful trolling attempt.

I assure that this is yet another case of your misinterpreting others' posts. For one, that is clearly in reference to his scan-blitz clashes with Mr Master in recent times, which is reminiscent of the Master/GalacticStorm scan wars of old. Secondly I've never accused him once of being dishonest in any way possible. That's another instance of your tendency to lie on top of misinterpreting simple English.
Oh, now you're claiming that was a compliment. El oh El.

Oh, the irony is certainly there, it is certainly in an overload mode, and it is quite clearly on the part of a certain Superman-fan whom the House of El has already disowned. 👆
So you've nothing but these pathetic attempts of baiting me? Concession accepted. Now run along and back up your claims by your own and not ride on somebody else's arguments.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Death and the comic disagrees with him and you. That's all that matters. Also no bite for your pitiful trolling attempt.

Oh, now you're claiming that was a compliment. El oh El.

So you've nothing but these pathetic attempts of baiting me? Concession accepted. Now run along and back up your claims by your own and not ride on somebody else's arguments.


I don't need to worry about that, as operator already disproved your exaggeration+lie+misinterpretation combo with scans from the comic itself. 👆

Considering that I've never actually trolled him as I often do other posters on these forums(Galan, Leo, ODG, MrMaster, Bran among others), yes, I'd consider it a compliment. Or are you so simple-minded that I have to go back to the thread in question to specify what I meant when I said that he had become the new GS? Even though the rest of my post("without all of the Phoenix obsession"😉 should have made it clear in the first place?

You have a funny way of trying to quanchi around, considering how much effort you put into fleeing from him. Lol on the baiting part though. Gave me a good laugh.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
I don't need to worry about that, as operator already disproved your exaggeration+lie+misinterpretation combo with scans from the comic itself. 👆
Operator didn't disprove anything and he just produced one scan which showed that Death was multiversal.

😂

Considering that I've never actually trolled him as I often do other posters on these forums(Galan, Leo, ODG, MrMaster, Bran among others), yes, I'd consider it a compliment. Or are you so simple-minded that I have to go back to the thread in question to specify what I meant when I said that he had become the new GS? Even though the rest of my post("without all of the Phoenix obsession"😉 should have made it clear in the first place?
Hahaha, sure thing buddy. I would send your regards to operator too.

You have a funny way of trying to quanchi around, considering how much effort you put into fleeing from him. Lol on the baiting part though. Gave me a good laugh.
I just ignore him, its fun to see him trying to get my attention.

Also you got your laugh. Anything else?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Operator didn't disprove anything and he just produced one scan which showed that Death was multiversal.

He disproved your claim that Death was defeated via punches by pointing out that it was fine on later pages. He called you out on your misinterpretation. He also disproved your assertion that it was a universal being. You were proven wrong.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Hahaha, sure thing buddy. I would send your regards to operator too.

I accept you submitting to me.
Originally posted by abhilegend
I just ignore him, its fun to see him trying to get my attention.

Also you got your laugh. Anything else?


You fear him. It's all too evident from the effort you put into avoiding having to argue with him. Disgraceful.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
He disproved your claim that Death was defeated via punches by pointing out that it was fine on later pages.
While Death admitted defeat which he omitted. Being fine doesn't mean he wasn't defeated.
He called you out on your misinterpretation.
And I disproved his claims.
He also disproved your assertion that it was a universal being. You were proven wrong.
He did nothing but post his interpretation without posting any scans. He was wrong, you are wrong. Move on.

[quoteI accept you submitting to me.[/quote] Hahahaha.

You fear him. It's all too evident from the effort you put into avoiding having to argue with him. Disgraceful.
I pity him as much I do to you.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller

You fear him. It's all too evident from the effort you put into avoiding having to argue with him. Disgraceful.
👆

So.....Superman wins. Now I've brought it back on topic.

Originally posted by Raisen
every single one of the superman threads become painful to read.

Originally posted by abhilegend
While Death admitted defeat which he omitted. Being fine doesn't mean he wasn't defeated. And I disproved his claims. He did nothing but post his interpretation without posting any scans. He was wrong, you are wrong. Move on.

[quoteI accept you submitting to me.

Hahahaha.

I pity him as much I do to you. [/QUOTE]

It didn't affect him. He proved his point. He explained why the entity believed itself defeated, and it had nothing to do with getting boxed around. You disproved jack sh1t. He was right. You were wrong. Point proven.

Get back to me when you learn how to even utilize the quote function properly.

You have nightmares of him. How embarrassing.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller

It didn't affect him.
It defeated him.
He proved his point.
Not at all.
He explained why the entity believed itself defeated, and it had nothing to do with getting boxed around.
He did nothing and the entity never explained hope to be the reason it was defeated. How do you even know it since he never posted a scan of the entity saying anything like that?

You disproved jack sh1t.
I disproved everything.
He was right. You were wrong. Point proven.
Lulz, chant it untill you believe it.

Get back to me when you learn how to even utilize the quote function properly.
Hahahaha. You can't even do it yourself.

You have nightmares of him. How embarrassing.
I laugh at him just like I'm laughing at you for being a hypocrite of highest order.