DOTNG Orion vs Sundipped Superman OWAW

Started by TheGodKiller6 pages

Originally posted by abhilegend
It defeated him. Not at all. He did nothing and the entity never explained hope to be the reason it was defeated. How do you even know it since he never posted a scan of the entity saying anything like that?

I disproved everything. Lulz, chant it untill you believe it.

Hahahaha. You can't even do it yourself.

I laugh at him just like I'm laughing at you for being a hypocrite of highest order.


It was fine later on. Operator explained the context behind the feat. Superman didn't beat it by punching it. You lack the ability to comprehend comics, or even basic English itself.

It's clear that the word "everything" in your vocabulary is synonymous with "jack-sh1t" then.

Your flawed quoting is the reason my own post came out wrong. Of course you might have caught wind of it if you even knew how the quote function works. I also usually don't edit other people's posts.

Your fear of quan, your inability to comprehend comics, your inability to properly utilize the quote function(or even understand how it works) and your overall poor grasp of the English language is appalling.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
It was fine later on.
😂

What does that have to do with the fact that superman beat him and Death conceded it. Superman isn't a killer.

Operator explained the context behind the feat.
Never did.
Superman didn't beat it by punching it. You lack the ability to comprehend comics, or even basic English itself.
He did and he conceded that he was wrong. Your desperation to have the last word is amusing, last time bada had to stop you from literally crying.

It's clear that the word "everything" in your vocabulary is synonymous with "jack-sh1t" then.
In your dictionary maybe. In mine it means "everything".

Your flawed quoting is the reason my own post came out wrong. Of course you might have caught wind of it if you even knew how the quote function works. I also usually don't edit other people's posts.
You don't even have your argument. Also if you could just delete, you could've avoided it just like I did. Maybe you should learn about typing first.

Your fear of quan, your inability to comprehend comics, your inability to properly utilize the quote function(or even understand how it works) and your overall poor grasp of the English language is appalling.
Hahahaha. You're like quan with none of his trolling capacity trying to troll. Quite amusing. I got quite a laugh.

Guys, cut it out with the personal comments. Seriously.

^Edit: Didn't see that.

Originally posted by abhilegend
😂

What does that have to do with the fact that superman beat him and Death conceded it. Superman isn't a killer.
Never did. He did and he conceded that he was wrong. Your desperation to have the last word is amusing, last time bada had to stop you from literally crying.

In your dictionary maybe. In mine it means "everything".

You don't even have your argument. Also if you could just delete, you could've avoided it just like I did. Maybe you should learn about typing first.

Hahahaha. You're like quan with none of his trolling capacity trying to troll. Quite amusing. I got quite a laugh.


It was fine. It wasn't beaten via punches. Operator proved it.

Nope, it's clear that your vocabulary is as messed up as you.

You really don't have the first clue what you're talking about, do you? Delete has nothing to do with anything. Ask any other poster here to try and quote-preview your botched post. It'll end looking just the same as mine, and it's attributable to your snag:

I already pointed out that I don't edit other people's posts. Ironic, you trying lecture me on how to properly utilize the QF when your quote-snag is the reason both our posts got botched in the first place.

Concession accepted. 🙂

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
^Edit: Didn't see that.
Ah, so you can edit now.

😂

It was fine. It wasn't beaten via punches. Operator proved it.
Post the scans if he did that and not just arguments.

Nope, it's clear that your vocabulary is as messed up as you.
Its fine than yours though.

You really don't have the first clue what you're talking about, do you? Delete has nothing to do with anything. Ask any other poster here to try and quote-preview your botched post. It'll end looking just the same as mine, and it's attributable to your snag:
I know why it happened, its just laughable that you were trying to lecture me on quoting while you can't do it by yourself too. Pointing the fault on me wouldn't save your face from hypocrisy.
I already pointed out that I don't edit other people's posts. Ironic, you trying lecture me on how to properly utilize the QF when your quote-snag is the reason both our posts got botched in the first place.
It was a typo. Seriously, you are just being desperate now.

Concession accepted. 🙂
Whatever helps you sleep at the night.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Ah, so you can edit now.

😂

Post the scans if he did that and not just arguments.

Its fine than yours though.

I know why it happened, its just laughable that you were trying to lecture me on quoting while you can't do it by yourself too. Pointing the fault on me wouldn't save your face from hypocrisy.
It was a typo. Seriously, you are just being desperate now.

Whatever helps you sleep at the night.


My post. Not someone else's. You seriously need to brush up your reading comprehension skills. This thread is an appalling example of how poor and sub-par they are.

Operator already did so. He disproved your exaggeration with context.

"It's finer than yours." That sentence is a perfect example of your defective vocabulary. 🙂

You're either blind, considering how you can't read what I write, or you suffer from some major disorder which might explain your less-than-pitiful comprehension abilities and grasp of basic English. There was no quote-botch on my part, it was all on you. Your snag is what caused my post to appear the way it did, and any other poster here can preview your botched post to confirm it. The only way to avoid it would have been to edit out YOUR botch, which I didn't do so because I usually don't others' posts, and to also showcase what a failure you are at using basic features of KMC forums like the quote function. I am not sure whether even a preliminary school child would need such an extensive explanation on what they did wrong, but I guess comparing you to a prelim kid is equitable insulting said kid.

Your humiliation won't be grieved upon.

@abhilegend:

Im not sure from where are you getting that i said superman defeated death by punching. I never said that.

When death appeared for the last time, superman thought that he was going to engage in another battle, and said that he can't because he was too tired (seems also to imply that Death had superman at a disadvantage there), yet Death told him that he isn't there to put superman in another battle but came to thank him because he made him aware that death is not the master of all things as well as made him aware of something inside his soul....hope. Here are the consecutive scans for everyone to see:

http://i.imgur.com/SR7Hz7U.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/ACVz7sq.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Q2XXLri.jpg

so superman did absolutely nothing - nothing at all - to Death, it was completely unharmed (which also makes sense considering that Death is an abstract)

Now you can have your own interpretation that superman punched through death but ultimately it doesn't matter, because we know that Death was seen fine the very next page (and that's my main point)

Still though, you and i both know that for those who just looked at your scans without having read the issue (which would be the majority, since superman where is thy sting, isn't a popular comic) they thought that superman outright oneshot-destroyed Death.

Originally posted by operator616
@abhilegend:

Im not sure from where are you getting that i said superman defeated death by punching. I never said that.

When death appeared for the last time, superman thought that he was going to engage in another battle, and said that he can't because he was too tired (seems also to imply that Death had superman at a disadvantage there), yet Death told him that he isn't there to put superman in another battle but came to thank him because he made him aware that death is not the master of all things as well as made him aware of something inside his soul....hope. Here are the consecutive scans for everyone to see:

http://i.imgur.com/SR7Hz7U.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/ACVz7sq.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Q2XXLri.jpg

so superman did absolutely nothing - nothing at all - to Death, it was completely unharmed (which also makes sense considering that Death is an abstract)

Now you can have your own interpretation that superman punched through death but ultimately it doesn't matter, because we know that Death was seen fine the very next page (and that's my main point)

Still though, you and i both know that for those who just looked at your scans without having read the issue (which would be the majority, since superman where is they sting, isn't a popular comic) they thought that superman outright oneshot-destroyed Death.


It's his shtick. Constantly misinterpreting comics to make the characters he likes look better, and the ones he dislikes worse.

Just check out the Debunking Thread on the Comic Books Forum. That's a prime example of abhilegend in action.

He was able to physically damage a multiversal being. The fact that the being had to reform on the next page would count as a forum win here.

Another feat that is being overlooked here is that The Source was trying to defeat /destroy Soulfire DS but couldn't even scratch him and superman cut him in half.

Originally posted by Diesldude
He was able to physically damage a multiversal being. The fact that the begin had to reform on the next page would count as a forum win here.

Another feat that is being overlooked here is that The Source was trying to defeat /destroy Soulfire DS but couldn't even scratch him and superman cut him in half.


Forum Rules don't suggest that. If the Sentry reforms from getting destroyed by his wife's Skrull weapon, then that doesn't count as a forum win for the skrull-armed wife. It's impressive enough that he was able to affect an entity as powerful as that one. Let's not go ahead and exaggerate that he simply defeated it by punching it something fierce.

Originally posted by operator616
@abhilegend:

Im not sure from where are you getting that i said superman defeated death by punching. I never said that.

You said superman didn't beat Death by hope either, yet he defeated Death by Death's own admission.

When death appeared for the last time, superman thought that he was going to engage in another battle, and said that he can't because he was too tired (seems also to imply that Death had superman at a disadvantage there), yet Death told him that he isn't there to put superman in another battle but came to thank him because he made him aware that death is not the master of all things as well as made him aware of something inside his soul....hope. Here are the consecutive scans for everyone to see:

http://i.imgur.com/SR7Hz7U.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/ACVz7sq.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Q2XXLri.jpg

facepalm

Are you trying to suggest that Death conceding superman defeated him after superman punched him means nothing just because Death appeared unharmed?

so superman did absolutely nothing - nothing at all - to Death, it was completely unharmed (which also makes sense considering that Death is an abstract)
He punched through it and defeated him per Death's own admission. I can't even believe that an enemy appearing unharmed later means he wasn't defeated. How many comics have you read?

Now you can have your own interpretation that superman punched through death but ultimately it doesn't matter, because we know that Death was seen fine the very next page (and that's my main point)
Later appearing fine doesn't means shit. Death conceded superman defeated him after he punched him and broke Death's control. Does everytime when a character gets up from a KO one page later means he wasn't beaten?

Still though, you and i both know that for those who just looked at your scans without having read the issue (which would be the majority, since superman where is thy sting, isn't a popular comic) they thought that superman outright oneshot-destroyed Death.
Never said that. I said superman defeated him.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
It's his shtick. Constantly misinterpreting comics to make the characters he likes look better, and the ones he dislikes worse.

👆

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
My post. Not someone else's. You seriously need to brush up your reading comprehension skills. This thread is an appalling example of how poor and sub-par they are.

Operator already did so. He disproved your exaggeration with context.

"It's [b]finer than yours." That sentence is a perfect example of your defective vocabulary. 🙂

You're either blind, considering how you can't read what I write, or you suffer from some major disorder which might explain your less-than-pitiful comprehension abilities and grasp of basic English. There was no quote-botch on my part, it was all on you. Your snag is what caused my post to appear the way it did, and any other poster here can preview your botched post to confirm it. The only way to avoid it would have been to edit out YOUR botch, which I didn't do so because I usually don't others' posts, and to also showcase what a failure you are at using basic features of KMC forums like the quote function. I am not sure whether even a preliminary school child would need such an extensive explanation on what they did wrong, but I guess comparing you to a prelim kid is equitable insulting said kid.

Your humiliation won't be grieved upon. [/B]


Your post is just riding on someone else's argument. Typical.

He did nothing of that sort. He is just being stubborn.

Ok, grammar nazi.

Blah, blah, blah. It was one typo. Deal with it. Pr already said cut it out.

Your humiliation is already upon you.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
It's his shtick. Constantly misinterpreting comics to make the characters he likes look better, and the ones he dislikes worse.

Just check out the Debunking Thread on the Comic Books Forum. That's a prime example of abhilegend in action.


😂

You are desperate, I get it.

Originally posted by operator616
👆

Seriously? So I can put a scan of a character appearing fine after a knock out and claim he was just fine and the KO never happened even though he conceded it and its exaggeration? Are you seriously that ignorant?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Your post is just riding on someone else's argument. Typical.

He did nothing of that sort. He is just being stubborn.

Ok, grammar nazi.

Blah, blah, blah. It was one typo. Deal with it. Pr already said cut it out.

Your humiliation is already upon you.


Remind what relevancy that has w.r.t you with you trying to point out my edit addressing Pr as some sort of hypocritical stance. Oh right, it has none. You making a pointless point, just like always.

Nope, you're the one who's stubborn here. Operator called you out on your lie.

Concession accepted.

Irony on you invoking Raoul's directive.

If you're going to insult, at least come up with something original, rather than relying on a poor variation of mine. Otherwise you end up humiliating yourself even further.

Originally posted by abhilegend
😂

You are desperate, I get it.


hysterical

Originally posted by operator616
👆
Thanks for clearing the air. Context always needs to be brought into clear up these feats.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Remind what relevancy that has w.r.t you with you trying to point out my edit addressing Pr as some sort of hypocritical stance. Oh right, it has none. You making a pointless point, just like always.
That wasn't my point of you being hypocritical. Your calling out of me for quote function problem was. Your reading comprehension is as awful as always.

Nope, you're the one who's stubborn here. Operator called you out on your lie.
I put him in his place just after that.

Concession accepted.
Sure thing quan jr.

Irony on you invoking Raoul's directive.
Because you always invoke mod ruling. Oh wait.....

If you're going to insult, at least come up with something original, rather than relying on a poor variation of mine. Otherwise you end up humiliating yourself even further.
I wasn't insulting you. Oh you poor lad, always seeing insults where there is none.

hysterical
Well cheerleading someone is right up your alley. You even brought your pom-poms.

Originally posted by abhilegend
That wasn't my point of you being hypocritical. Your calling out of me for quote function problem was. Your reading comprehension is as awful as always.

I put him in his place just after that.

Sure thing quan jr.

Because you always invoke mod ruling. Oh wait.....

I wasn't insulting you. Oh you poor lad, always seeing insults where there is none.

Well cheerleading someone is right up your alley. You even brought your pom-poms.


Are you sure that you even remember what we're talking about? Last I checked, you were laughing at me making an edit, which then randomly got removed to you claiming that I always ride on others' arguments, which now has been further swapped off onto you claiming that you calling me hypocritical has to do with my perfectly valid criticism of your inability to use the quote function.

Pretty sure most of the forum would disagree on that front.

As if that's an insult. Now being called an abhi on the other hand...

Do point out exactly how many times have I invoked mod rulings in the past. And that's not a mod ruling, cupcake, it's a directive. You can't even differentiate one word from another. English language and I are having a laugh at your expense.

Backing off from your flunked attempt at trying to pick and e-fight. How typically abhi of you.

We're finally making some progress. Now that you have learnt how to develop original insults, let's hope you can create good ones. 👆

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Are you sure that you even remember what we're talking about? Last I checked, you were laughing at me making an edit, which then randomly got removed to you claiming that I always ride on others' arguments, which now has been further swapped off onto you claiming that you calling me hypocritical has to do with my perfectly valid criticism of your inability to use the quote function.

Pretty sure most of the forum would disagree on that front.

As if that's an insult. Now being called an abhi on the other hand...

Do point out exactly how many times have I invoked mod rulings in the past. And that's not a mod ruling, cupcake, it's a directive. You can't even differentiate one word from another. English language and I are having a laugh at your expense.

Backing off from your flunked attempt at trying to pick and e-fight. How typically abhi of you.

We're finally making some progress. Now that you have learnt how to develop original insults, let's hope you can create good ones. 👆


Yes, I do. Do you?

Who cares about forum? You fight your own battles which skipped past you.

I could care less about what some internet forum posters thinks and toss out as insults.

You always get in trouble with not following mod rules. You can't even detect sarcasm.

Who's backing off? I didn't insult you though.

Again seeing insults where there is none. Oh poor boy, we'll sort you out too.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Yes, I do. Do you?

Who cares about forum? You fight your own battles which skipped past you.

I could care less about what some internet forum posters thinks and toss out as insults.

You always get in trouble with not following mod rules. You can't even detect sarcasm.

Who's backing off? I didn't insult you though.

Again seeing insults where there is none. Oh poor boy, we'll sort you out too.


Your posts say otherwise.

I bet if there was a poll regarding whether or not operator destroyed you on that subject, operator's side would get the vast majority of the votes.

The insecurity which reeks from the above post of yours says otherwise.

That's hilarious coming from you of all people. Monkeys are reptiles if that is sarcasm.

You are. You did.

It's written as "where there are none". The English language had its laugh, now it just feels effin' sad.