Batman vs. Iron Man

Started by maxivitopowe29 pages

Apart from the OB how many of those have auto regulated targeting

Originally posted by maxivitopowe
Apart from the OB how many of those have auto regulated targeting

A smart targeting system that can predict where his next move will be

^yep

Originally posted by maxivitopowe
A smart targeting system that can predict where his next move will be

That's why you have sensor destabilizers so you are hidden from targeting systems.

"Nuh uh!"

"Uh huh!"

Originally posted by Odekahn
That's why you have sensor destabilizers so you are hidden from targeting systems.

"Nuh uh!"

"Uh huh!"

lmfao 👆

Originally posted by maxivitopowe
Apart from the OB how many of those have auto regulated targeting

I guess that would depend on what you call Deadshot's eye?

And if you want proof of how impressive it is to dodge shots from these guys we could always go to those character's shooting feats? And Darksed's OE targeting feats?

^rhetorical. Let's don't and say we did. Lol

Originally posted by Odekahn
That's why you have sensor destabilizers so you are hidden from targeting systems.

"Nuh uh!"

"Uh huh!"

I see, so in that case Ironman wins this. No one said that you get to be Batman, or that this is a CIS off battle. One week is simply not enough time to out-prep Tony while he has huge advantages over Batman. Yeah Tony is dependent on the armor, but Bruce is dependent on his legs.

It's funny how people will generally admit that Tony is better at building tech and yet when it comes to a fight, for some reason Batman is always able to build tech capable of disabling or controlling Tony's.

Originally posted by Odekahn
I guess that would depend on what you call Deadshot's eye?

And if you want proof of how impressive it is to dodge shots from these guys we could always go to those character's shooting feats? And Darksed's OE targeting feats?

^rhetorical. Let's don't and say we did. Lol

You're going to sit there and compare Dead Shot's eye to armor worth trillions? I get it now, you've never read Ironman. And what's with the lol crap?

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's funny how people will generally admit that Tony is better at building tech and yet when it comes to a fight, for some reason Batman is always able to build tech capable of disabling or controlling Tony's.

No it's just that Ode is trying to paint Tony in a poor light.

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's funny how people will generally admit that Tony is better at building tech and yet when it comes to a fight, for some reason Batman is always able to build tech capable of disabling or controlling Tony's.

Not disabling or controlling Tony's physical tech, simply NEGATING (or hiding from) its searching effects.

Originally posted by Stoic
You're going to sit there and compare Dead Shot's eye to armor worth trillions? I get it now, you've never read Ironman. And what's with the lol crap?

I was just trying to let you know that I didn't mean that last statement as if I was "speaking" in a blunt tone. (Not because I thought it was funny)

Comparing a targeting system with Deadshot's eye isn't lowballing. And Tony isn't the only one with billions of dollars to spend.

Originally posted by Odekahn
Not disabling or controlling Tony's physical tech, simply NEGATING (or hiding from) its searching effects.

Assuming Batman manages to build something that can block Tony's sensors(even though he doesn't know what type Tony's uses) Tony can just aim manually, so it doesn't really help Batman all that much, plus it gives Tony all the more of a lead in increasing his offensive and defensive systems.

Tony should win a nice majority.

Originally posted by Silent Master
...Tony can just aim manually, so it doesn't really help Batman all that much...
Originally posted by Odekahn
Batman is too acrobatic for Ironman to shoot. How many shots has Batman dodged? He's dodged the omega effect, shots from master shooters like deadshot and Slade. Blah Blah Blah
Originally posted by Odekahn

Great, if Batman is able to jump around that much it means he's not in any kind of armored suit or carrying any heavy weapons; so Iron-man would be in no danger and can take his time and tire Batman out.

Originally posted by Silent Master
so Iron-man would be in no danger and can take his time and tire Batman out.
Originally posted by Odekahn
Tonys biggest weakness here is his ego.

"Come into my parlor said the Spider to the Fly..."

He could also build an better version of the InsiderSuit and Robots.

Originally posted by Odekahn
"Come into my parlor said the Spider to the Fly..."

So now you're argument is that Batman will just jump around in an effort to lure Iron-man into underestimating him? Ok, so what does Bruce do once Tony starts laughing at the guy that didn't bring any weapons capable of beating him?

Marvel fans act as if Bruce hasn't already designed advanced battle suits(and other tech) to conquer just about every situation that calls for them.lol

Originally posted by Silent Master
So now you're argument is that Batman will just jump around in an effort to lure Iron-man into underestimating him? Ok, so what does Bruce do once Tony starts laughing at the guy that didn't bring any weapons capable of beating him?

I never said that was his endgame defense and strategy, I was just giving you a plausible solution to a given circumstance or attack. I could continue on with this, but the reason I included the "blah blah blah" (in the first post introducing this point) is because I wanted to demonstrate the type of arguing that has been used from the Ironman camp thus far in their claims that Batman wouldn't stand a chance.

<3
-the "Batman finds a way" camp