Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I'm afraid that they have, actually, hell, even the love charm used by Harry's mother is explicitly 'simple'. Unforgivable =/= unstoppable.Ganondorf tanks magical effects so far beyond the scope of the potterverse it's laughable.
Oh right, I forgot about the Master Sword being a planet-buster.
The killing curse isn't some lightning ball or whatever, it just kills you.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Sauron doesn't even have a body so lets not act like he's even act like he's close to full power at this point. Gandalf was soundly defeated despite facing off against Sauron minus a body. Sauron is the baddest being out there from Peter Jackson's films.
And a body is relevant to Saurons powerlevel as shown in the movies how? For all intents and purpose Sauron without his body in the hobbit has shown more feats then Sauron did in the first Lotr movie. I never claimed he wasn't defeated, I merely contested you notion that Gandalf was owned which he clearly wasn't.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Ganon surviving injury and holy damage doesn't mean he'll survive a spell that instantly kills anyone regardless of protection (other than wuv).
Or a shield, or a statue, or...
You get the idea.
Ganondorf's magical protection (The Triforce of Power) is demonstrably greater than anything in HP canon.
But then I am speaking to the same dumbass who thinks a dragon from A Song of Ice and Fire could kill Ganondorf, lol.
Originally posted by UtrigitaWhy would he want a body then since according to you it makes him vulnerable and no more powerful. The Witch King broke Gandalf the White. This isn't some code which needs to be cracked.
And a body is relevant to Saurons powerlevel as shown in the movies how? For all intents and purpose Sauron without his body in the hobbit has shown more feats then Sauron did in the first Lotr movie. I never claimed he wasn't defeated, I merely contested you notion that Gandalf was owned which he clearly wasn't.
He was owned easily. Sauron easily raped him.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Oh right, I forgot about the Master Sword being a planet-buster.The killing curse isn't some lightning ball or whatever, it just kills you.
Or shrugging off the effects of the Twilight Realm.
Both effects far in excess of Voldemort's own magic. Voldemort can't touch him.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Lol. Go on then, ignore Ganondorf being shot with demigods enchanted to [b]destroy evil, and then laughing them off.Or shrugging off the effects of the Twilight Realm.
Both effects far in excess of Voldemort's own magic. Voldemort can't touch him. [/B]
Whats that first one?
Lol, Twilight Realm.
Originally posted by BloodRainHis mother sacrificed herself, Voldemort did disarm/beat him in OOTP, he was never the rightful owner of the Elder Wand, Harry fled from him before, etc.
Wasn't Harry the same age?
Harry was never a matchup for Voldemort. Link straight up wrecks Dorf every adventure. Harry had years of experience as opposed to Link's weeks of adventure. Not comparable at all.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Why would he want a body then since according to you it makes him vulnerable and no more powerful. The Witch King broke Gandalf the White. This isn't some code which needs to be cracked.He was owned easily. Sauron easily raped him.
Working from a feat perspective he doesn't need a body, that is all I'm saying as his performance in the Hobbit was much better then in LOTR. Care to contest that? In a extended cut scene which didn't make it into the movie, because it was in direct conflict with Tolkins own words on the subject. So the non canon cutscene is relevant how?
Just needed three or four times to get through a weakened Gandalfs shield, yes what a horrible stomp....
Originally posted by NemeBro
Needs to actually penetrate what it hits, yes.Attack hits Ganondorf's armour, what do?
The spell isn't stopped by clothing and wizards like, have suits of armor everywhere in their shit but never put it on. I'd think if it was that easy they'd wear it, as wizards have been running around since the medieval times and have armor readily available even in modern times, yet still can't block AK.
Originally posted by UtrigitaHe died quickly in Lotr one. That's why this feat was more impressive but personally I see him killing all those men in battle as being more impressive than defeating Gandalf.
Working from a feat perspective he doesn't need a body, that is all I'm saying as his performance in the Hobbit was much better then in LOTR. Care to contest that? In a extended cut scene which didn't make it into the movie, because it was in direct conflict with Tolkins own words on the subject. So the non canon cutscene is relevant how?Just needed three or four times to get through a weakened Gandalfs shield, yes what a horrible stomp....
Jackson doesn't care and threw in all kinds of new scenes for this film. Relax. It isn't the book. The outcome was a stomp. Dalf never had a chance and went down easily.