Jack Reacher versus John McClane

Started by Robtard18 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I am saying it how it is. McClane was destroyed.

Stuart was on the plane. John went off it. Before that he destroyed John.

Yes, I proved it with two clips.

Reacher wins. Stuart owned John.

So "destroyed" even though he was fine after fighting and killing a guy, then taking hit after hit from another guy and finally being kicked off an airplane. Yeah, clearly "destroyed".

You're a silly youtube debater. Stuart was fleeing from McClane and used a BFR as a means to get away from McClane. That's the film 🙂

You accidentally supported my case with the DH2 clip is what you did 👆

Not proven. Stuart "won" by essentially running away; I'm not surprised at all you see fleeing as a "win".

Originally posted by Robtard
So "destroyed" even though he was fine after fighting and killing a guy, then taking hit after hit from another guy and finally being kicked off an airplane. Yeah, clearly "destroyed".

You're a silly youtube debater. Stuart was fleeing from McClane and used a BFR as a means to get away from McClane. That's the film 🙂

You accidentally supported my case with the DH2 clip is what you did 👆

Not proven. Stuart "won" by essentially running away; I'm not surprised at all you see fleeing as a "win".

Stuart won the fight. He showed his skills were something McClane could not attest for. Luckily for him him he fell off the plane.

Stuart was leaving the scene. John came up and was slapped down. Stuart was fine too after his skirmish with John.

Proved skilled fighters own John.

John fell off the plane. Bfr is a win.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Stuart won the fight. He showed his skills were something McClane could not attest for. Luckily for him him he fell off the plane.

Stuart was leaving the scene. John came up and was slapped down. Stuart was fine too after his skirmish with John.

Proved skilled fighters own John.

John fell off the plane. Bfr is a win.

"Stuart had no choice but to BFR in order to escape; that's a win". You actually believe that 😂

So if two opponents fights, one runs away and they're both fine. You think the logical conclusion is the guy who ran to be the winner? 😂

Beating on someone and not putting them permanently down isn't "winning". Especially when the beater has to resort to running-away-tactics.

Your silly flips aside, Reacher's not taking out McClane as McClane's survived worse damage and walked away. Reacher can only beat on McClane. Or Reacher can run away as a "win" in your mind.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Stuart had no choice but to BFR in order to escape; that's a win". You actually believe that 😂

So if two opponents fights, one runs away and they're both fine. You think the logical conclusion is the guy who ran to be the winner? 😂

Beating on someone and not putting them permanently down isn't "winning". Especially when the beater has to resort to running-away-tactics.

Your silly flips aside, Reacher's not taking out McClane as McClane's survived worse damage and walked away. Reacher can only beat on McClane. Or Reacher can run away as a "win" in your mind.

Bfr is a win.

Being beaten off a plane isn't running away it is standing your ground and imposing your will.

John left the arena not Stuart.

No limits fallacy. Talk about the car wrecks some more.

LOL at fleeing from McClane and "BFR". It's pretty blatant that the only reason McClane was kicked off (luckily for him because had he miraculously made it past Stuart, he would have been facing 20 armed mercs. McDeath) is because they were fighting on a narrow surface and the impact McClane was hit with was enough to knock him off.

Same with Lihn in DH4.Only reason he had an advantage on Lihn is because she foolishly turned her back, NOT because he outmaneuvered her in fighting skill (and LOL if you think "playing dead", as you've tried to claim before, is outmaneuvering somebody). Had those fights taken place on say, a basketball court, where McClane luckily escaping the beatdown isn't possible, McClane would have had the manshit kicked out of him with no possible defense.

McClane has no fighting skill, proven onscreen. Stop with the Mcwanking, Rob, it's getting tiresome. McClane gets his ass kicked here. /story

Take that Mcfanboy.

😂

Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL at fleeing from McClane and "BFR". It's pretty blatant that the only reason McClane was kicked off (luckily for him because had he miraculously made it past Stuart, he would have been facing 20 armed mercs. McDeath) is because they were fighting on a narrow surface and the impact McClane was hit with was enough to knock him off.

Same with Lihn in DH4.Only reason he had an advantage on Lihn is because she foolishly turned her back, [b]NOT because he outmaneuvered her in fighting skill (and LOL if you think "playing dead", as you've tried to claim before, is outmaneuvering somebody). Had those fights taken place on say, a basketball court, where McClane luckily escaping the beatdown isn't possible, McClane would have had the manshit kicked out of him with no possible defense.

McClane has no fighting skill, proven onscreen. Stop with the Mcwanking, Rob, it's getting tiresome. McClane gets his ass kicked here. /story [/B]

Are you suggesting that Col. Stuart didn't realize the extent of his attacks, the battle ground and that McClane would be kicked off from a blow like that? Cos that's odd.

You're assuming that she could have killed him just because she managed to knock him down on his knees. That's a silly assumption considering his damage soak.

Disagree. He clearly has some skills. Unless you think disarming a gunmen while on yours knees and taking him out is "no skills"? That's from DH5 BTW.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Take that Mcfanboy.

😂

As ever, you run away from me when you can't prove your case and hide behind other men who have debating skills by cheer-leading 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
As ever, you run away from me when you can't prove your case and hide behind other men who have debating skills by cheer-leading 🙂
My post is still up, Dummy.

You're a fanboy though.

Originally posted by quanchi112
My post is still up, Dummy.

You're a fanboy though.

Everyone else is a fanboy but Rob is not allowed to be called one..makes sense.

Originally posted by quanchi112
My post is still up, Dummy.

You're a fanboy though.

Keep running and cheer-leading, you're far greater at than than debating.

Originally posted by Robtard
Keep running and cheer-leading, you're far greater at than than debating.
It was amusing to see him call you out.

Originally posted by Robtard
Keep running and cheer-leading, you're far greater at than than debating.

So your not a fan boy by your logic but Quan is?

Originally posted by Supra
Everyone else is a fanboy but Rob is not allowed to be called one..makes sense.

Um, you're clearly the "Top" in your Quanchi-Supra relationship as proven in the Social Thread. Y

You don't need to cheer-lead for him anymore, assert your dominance, penetrate him if you must 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Um, you're clearly the "Top" in your Quanchi-Supra relationship as proven in the Social Thread. Y

ou don't need to cheer-lead for him anymore, assert your dominance, penetrate him if you must 🙂

Why are you so concerned with my relationships with other people?

Originally posted by Supra
So your not a fan boy by your logic but Quan is?
I also posted two threads backing myself up whereas Rob rarely if ever posts proof.

Originally posted by Supra
Why are you so concerned with my relationships with other people?
You're more than you think, pally. Assert your dominance.

Wait, unless you in fact enjoy cheer-leading? Not judging; to each their own I say, just curious 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
I also posted two threads backing myself up whereas Rob rarely if ever posts proof.

Its funny, Rob likes to aid and abed dirty socks, can't be accused of biased behavior or a fan boy but everyone else can.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I also posted two threads backing myself up whereas Rob rarely if ever posts proof.

The clever "accuse him of the nonsense I've done" tactic 👆

Originally posted by Robtard
You're more than you think, pally. Assert your dominance.

Wait, unless you in fact enjoy cheer-leading? Not judging; to each their own I say, just curious 🙂

Not making any sense Rob as your mind lives in the gutter with asking me to watch you masturbate and concerning yourself with other people. Keep making up nonsense.