Re: Re: Jack Reacher versus John McClane
Originally posted by RobtardNot to mention that Reacher was knocked senseless by one punch.
McClane wins.Not because he's faster or more skilled at H2H, as he isn't. He wins due to little 5'3" Jack Reacher not being able to down him.
McDurability feats >>>> Reacher's damage output potential /fact
Mac rapes.
Originally posted by BruceSkywalkerDid you have a tape measure present ?
Quan Rob is correct..I saw Tom Cruise in person when I went and saw The Last Samurai back in 2003. He is a very short person
5 foot seven is short whereas five foot three is extremely tiny. I take every other sites word for it over you two.