McClane vs 007

Originally posted by Robtard
Strawman argument used for the purposes of trolling 🙂

Can John beat 007 in a fight, its a simple question and this thread was created days ago, try spinning that one.

Hrmm, well, since the OP outlayed no rules (as Impediment pointed out) what is involved in this vs Supra? Pure H2H? Gunbattle? All out? Where is this fight to take place? Who has what equipment?

We need all this stuff outlined in the OP, that's why the rules say that OPs must be detailed...

Originally posted by Robtard
Strawman argument used for the purposes of trolling 🙂

This thread was made days ago, so again your wrong. Can John's "unbreakable durability" be broken by 007?

Originally posted by Supra
This thread was made days ago, so again your wrong. Can John's "unbreakable durability" be broken by 007?

Look up what a "strawman argument" implies. It has nothing to do with some odd statute of limitations you're implying.

Originally posted by Robtard
Strawman argument used for the purposes of trolling 🙂

You refuse to have an actual debate about this?

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Hrmm, well, since the OP outlayed no rules (as Impediment pointed out) what is involved in this vs Supra? Pure H2H? Gunbattle? All out? Where is this fight to take place? Who has what equipment?

We need all this stuff outlined in the OP, that's why the rules say that OPs must be detailed...

Hand to Hand first, after that is decided we could discuss a gun battle if you wish.

Originally posted by Supra
You refuse to have an actual debate about this?

Opening up with a strawman isn't the way to engage someone to an "actual debate". Just an FYI.

007 definitely wins h2h.

Originally posted by Robtard
Opening up with a strawman isn't the way to engage someone to an "actual debate". Just an FYI.

Are you going to debate or not?

Originally posted by FrothByte
007 definitely wins h2h.

Well apparently rob said John has superhuman durability so how would 007 blows be any more powerful then jack reachers who are not superhuman themselves? Although 007 took a high powered rifle bullet to the chest and survived prolly a 300 foot drop into a river. Dose that qualify as superhuman durability?

Originally posted by Supra
Well apparently rob said John has superhuman durability

Why not watch the DH films before debating? That would save a lot of trouble.

Originally posted by Robtard
Why not watch the DH films before debating? That would save a lot of trouble.

I have watched them all, please stop saying that. I admit he can take a beating and get back up, just like I said MoS could take a beating and get back up ok, but can he take 007?

You still clearly don't think McClane's durability is above normal human limits though. So which DH films have you watched?

Originally posted by Robtard
You still clearly don't think McClane's durability is above normal human limits though. So which DH films have you watched?

All of them, but I don't recall him going up against trained killers on the lvl of 007 or Jack Reacher was my point.

I suggest you watch the DH flicks again then.

McClane doesn't win by being a better fighter than his opponents, as he almost always isn't.

Originally posted by Robtard
I suggest you watch the DH flicks again then.

McClane doesn't win by being a better fighter than his opponents, as he almost always isn't.

Are you spinning or not, you said he clearly takes Jack Reacher, so can he beat 007 as well, its a simple question. Reacher and 007 have similar fighting skills and training.

Not.

I said he takes Reacher cos you didn't prove that Reacher could properly break McClane.

Reacher is an MP. Bond is MI6. Not really similar at all.

Originally posted by Robtard
Not.

I said he takes Reacher cos you didn't prove that Reacher could properly break McClane.

Reacher is an MP. Bond is MI6. Not really similar at all.

But Reacher is no stronger then 007, a hit is a hit, and if John can tank a hit with his superhuman durability then why could he not tank a hit from 007? Watch their fighting skills, they are almost exactly the same. They rely on fighting skills and quickness with death blows to undo their opponents.

Originally posted by Robtard
Not.

I said he takes Reacher cos you didn't prove that Reacher could properly break McClane.

Reacher is an MP. Bond is MI6. Not really similar at all.

Why is Supra still talking about Reacher vs McClane?

Want a like comparison:

Bond crashes an Aston Martin, a car with very cramped interior space and little room to flop about; not to mention built-up by MI6 and likely reinforced. He's out of commission:

YouTube video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTYwDTRv0XI

McClane crashes a Unimog, lots of room to flop about in. He walks out of the vehicle and is fine. He actually gets hit by a G-Class Benz right after, but that was cut out in this clip:

YouTube video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V2w0PTIXXs

Welcome to the Church of McClane 👆