McClane vs 007

Started by Supra6 pages

Your comparing a up armored military tank against a high speed chase ending in the car doing barrel rolls? That tank was wiping out half the city and kept going..how is that even fair?

Originally posted by Supra
Your comparing a up armored military tank against a high speed chase ending in the car doing barrel rolls? That tank was wiping out half the city and kept going..how is that even fair?

What you said above tells me that you haven't actually watched DH5 nor did you pay attention to that clip I posted. Shame on you.

McClane was in a Unimog. The villians were in the MRAP.

Originally posted by Robtard
What you said above tells me that you haven't actually watched DH5 nor did you pay attention to that clip I posted. Shame on you.

McClane was in a Unimog. The villians were in the MRAP.

What does this have to do with a hand to hand?

John's Unimog crash was nothing compared to 007's anyways. Your not making a strong stance with that..He was going insane fast in the Aston Martin and still survived.

Originally posted by Supra
What does this have to do with a hand to hand?

John's Unimog crash was nothing compared to 007's anyways. Your not making a strong stance with that..He was going insane fast in the Aston Martin.

"What does durability have to do in a fight?" That's essentially the question you're asking. Silly, no?

And now the downplaying starts. They were both very brutal crashes, yet one guy is out of commission and the other guy is fine. Really see no reason to continue since you'll dismiss evidence, even before actually watching it. The biased wall is thick.

Originally posted by Robtard
"What does durability have to do in a fight?" That's essentially the question you're asking. Silly, no?

And now the downplaying starts. They were both very brutal crashes, yet one guy is out of commission and the other guy is fine. Really see no reason to continue since you'll dismiss evidence, even before actually watching it. The biased wall is thick.

How fast was John going when he crashed? And how on earth are those crashes comparable..his Unimog didn't even flip one, it slid on its side. James was going well over 100mph to make that car flip the way it did and he didn't even die. Thats just as much durability imo.

Originally posted by Robtard

McClane was in a Unimog. The villians were in the MRAP.

Where did I say he wasn't in the Unimog?

Originally posted by Supra
How fast was John going when he crashed? And how on earth are those crashes comparable..his Unimog didn't even flip one, it slid on its side. James was going well over 100mph to make that car flip the way it did and he didn't even die. Thats just as much durability imo.

You're not even watching that clip I posted. The Unimog flips several times over what appears to be about 10 parked cars.

Bond, easily.

McClane is out of his league here. in a cat and mouse game, McClane may have a better chance but in a straight up fist fight, Bond walks away every time.

McClane is definitely out of his league here.

Originally posted by Robtard
You're not even watching that clip I posted. The Unimog flips several times over what appears to be about 10 parked cars.

I watched it three times!! What does that have to do with a fight fight between 007 and John?

Originally posted by Supra
I watched it three times!!

What does that have to do with a fight fight between 007 and John?

Then why do you keep claming McClane was never is a horrific accident where he flipped multiple times and walked out like a champ? Odd, no.

We covered that already:

Originally posted by Robtard
"What does durability have to do in a fight?" That's essentially the question you're asking. Silly, no?

Bond is on another level in skill and has been in grander schemes up against superior opponents than Johnny boy.

Originally posted by Robtard
Then why do you keep claming McClane was never is a horrific accident where he flipped multiple times and walked out like a champ? Odd, no.

We covered that already:

OK so he has better durability and beats 007?

Originally posted by Supra
OK so he has better durability and beats 007?
Notice how rob avoids the question while proclaiming he isn't biased.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Notice how rob avoids the question while proclaiming he isn't biased.

He want to bring a car crash into a hand to hand fight. If John is so durable in Robs eyes then his logic would be 007 blows would realize him.

Originally posted by Supra
He want to bring a car crash into a hand to hand fight. If John is so durable in Robs eyes then his logic would be 007 blows would realize him.
I guess if you survive a car crash that means you can beat UFC fighter. Factor in height somewhere because McClaniacs just say the darnedest things.

Jack and James have the Sam fighting style and systematic fighting style. They both go for crippling attacks as we are training in the military to do so. To endure your opponent dead or disabled within less then 2 hits. Knee break, hit to the face. Arm break, knee break and so one. The hits are designed for multiple person take down so you spend less time per person and move to the next.

Originally posted by Supra
Jack and James have the similar fighting style and systematic fighting style. They both go for crippling attacks as we are training in the military to do so. To endure your opponent dead or disabled within less then 2 hits. Knee break, hit to the face. Arm break, knee break and so one. The hits are designed for multiple person take down so you spend less time per person and move to the next.

You two are absolutely precious when you're raging and stroking each other's shafts 🙂

ps, try and keep the strawmanning down to under a 5