McClane vs 007

Originally posted by quanchi112
😂

If you actually watched the DH films, you'd know McClane gets more and more unrealistic with each film; like it or not, this is a fact 🙂

But that's your thing, debating from ignorance and youtube clips 🙂

Originally posted by Supra
You said in the Jack vs John thread his superhuman durability could not be bested by him, so how can his superhuman durability be now bested by 007?

You two are the cutest couple when you get together to make a strawman 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
You two are the cutest couple when you get together to make a strawman 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
So normal humans can not only survive what McClane has, but walk away with little to no injuries?

Correct. No one argued he's invulnerable like say Superman.

A fair assessment and I have already noted that 007 > McClane in skills.

Normal humans? No. Movie action heroes? Yes. McClane has had impressive durability feats, but so has other action heroes like Rambo, Conan, Frank Martin, every freakin Arnold schwarzenegger character, etc.. All of them has had feats that normal humans shouldn't be able to do and yet they do them even if their characters are still just "human".

In any case like I said, 007 isn't undefeatable. Especially Craig version. He's definitely no Jason Bourne and so McClane should get a few wins. But I still think 007 gets majority. Better skill, better training, and better physicality overall.

Originally posted by Robtard
You two are the cutest couple when you get together to make a strawman 🙂

You accuse me of saying the same thing over and over yet you do the same thing, I will remember this strawman.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Normal humans? No. Movie action heroes? Yes. McClane has had impressive durability feats, but so has other action heroes like Rambo, Conan, Frank Martin, every freakin Arnold schwarzenegger character, etc.. All of them has had feats that normal humans shouldn't be able to do and yet they do them even if their characters are still just "human".

In any case like I said, 007 isn't undefeatable. Especially Craig version. He's definitely no Jason Bourne and so McClane should get a few wins. But I still think 007 gets majority. Better skill, better training, and better physicality overall.

I was under the impression you were saying McClane was like a normal human in terms of what he can survive. So I have no issue with that you said now clarifying your stance.

Then we're not in disagreement by a large margin and I see no reason to continue. 👆

Originally posted by Robtard
I was under the impression you were saying McClane was like a normal human in terms of what he can survive. So I have no issue with that you said now clarifying your stance.

Then we're not in disagreement by a large margin and I see no reason to continue. 👆

No you seem to think his "unbreakable durability" can take anyone, a death blow is a death blow, the same blows can be delivered by 007 and Reacher but yet you think Reachers hits realize zero damage but now 007's can break him..

Flip Flop.

Originally posted by Supra
No you seem to think his "unbreakable durability" can take anyone, a death blow is a death blow, the same blows can be delivered by 007 and Reacher but yet you think Reachers hits realize zero damage but now 007's can break him..

Flip Flop.

The big boys are having a conversation. Just sit on the sidelines and watch the magic; maybe you can learn something 🙂

This is actually a double standard to bring up in the "JMvsJR" thread, not here.

If there's no disagreement Bond loses, the case is closed.

Originally posted by Lestov16
This is actually a double standard to bring up in the "JMvsJR" thread, not here.

If there's no disagreement Bond loses, the case is closed.

How can one guys blows not affect John, but 007's can, that's the point, they are both systematic fighters. They hit the same, not one is said to be stronger then the other. Thats the point.

I understand your point (it's a "double standard"😉, but here is not the appropriate place to make it. That is my point.

Originally posted by Lestov16
I understand your point (it's a "double standard"😉, but here is not the appropriate place to make it. That is my point.

Roger that