McClane vs 007

Originally posted by Robtard
You two are absolutely precious when you're raging and stroking each other's shafts 🙂

ps, try and keep the strawmanning down to under a 5

Originally posted by Robtard
You two are absolutely precious when you're raging and stroking each other's shafts 🙂

ps, try and keep the strawmanning down to under a 5

Why don't you chime in and say who wins then since your known for being in biased in your statements and only serve truths

It's utterally amazing that between the two of you brainiacs, you have yet to deduce who I think wins here 👆

"Spoon feed me and use small words!" -you

Originally posted by Robtard
It's utterally amazing that between the two of you brainiacs, you have yet to deduce who I think wins here 👆

"Spoon feed me and sue small words!" -you

Good so 007 beats the shit out of him and his superhuman durability fails.

Originally posted by Supra
Good so 007 beats the shit out of him and his superhuman durability fails.

Based on?

When has McClane's durability failed before?

Originally posted by Robtard
Based on?

When has McClane's durability failed before?

When he gets his ass kicked by that girl? 007 has taken high caliber bullet to the chest on top of a moving train then fell over 300 feet into a river and survived.

McClane is not superhuman. He's still susceptible to getting dislocated limbs or getting choked out. Just because he hasn't been shown to get KO'd before doesn't mean he is incapable of getting KO'd. That's no limits fallacy.

McClane can still win against 007 of course, but I think it will be more to his insane luck than due to skill or durability. For the majority though, 007 is just a better skilled, physically superior fighter than him.

Originally posted by FrothByte
McClane is not superhuman. He's still susceptible to getting dislocated limbs or getting choked out. Just because he hasn't been shown to get KO'd before doesn't mean he is incapable of getting KO'd. That's no limits fallacy.

McClane can still win against 007 of course, but I think it will be more to his insane luck than due to skill or durability. For the majority though, 007 is just a better skilled, physically superior fighter than him.

Here is one example of his fighting style, facing a armed opponet who caught him by surprise, 007 still wins.

YouTube video

Originally posted by Robtard
It's utterally amazing that between the two of you brainiacs, you have yet to deduce who I think wins here 👆

"Spoon feed me and use small words!" -you

Originally posted by Robtard
Based on?

When has McClane's durability failed before?

Originally posted by COG Veteran
MI6 agent > street cop.

Best post yet.

Originally posted by FrothByte
McClane is not superhuman.

He's still susceptible to getting dislocated limbs or getting choked out. Just because he hasn't been shown to get KO'd before doesn't mean he is incapable of getting KO'd. That's no limits fallacy.

McClane can still win against 007 of course, but I think it will be more to his insane luck than due to skill or durability. For the majority though, 007 is just a better skilled, physically superior fighter than him.

So normal humans can not only survive what McClane has, but walk away with little to no injuries?

Correct. No one argued he's invulnerable like say Superman.

A fair assessment and I have already noted that 007 > McClane in skills.

Originally posted by Robtard
So normal humans can not only survive what McClane has, but walk away with little to no injuries?

Correct. No one argued he's invulnerable like say Superman.

A fair assessment and I have already noted that 007 > McClane in skills.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No limits fallacy, clown.

Even though you make no limit fallacies all the time, you still don't know what one is 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Turncoat. You make Sadako sick.

Reading comprehension fail again.

Originally posted by Robtard
Even though you make no limit fallacies all the time, you still don't know what one is 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Reading comprehension fail again.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You implying he can't be ko'd and the like is such.

Ak killing someone not so much.

Stop lying. I did not imply that at all.

Stop crying in here over your inability to prove AK works somewhere else. Go tear in the proper thread 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Stop lying. I did not imply that at all.

Stop crying in here over your inability to prove AK works somewhere else. Go tear in the proper thread 🙂

Its a simple question, who do you think wins Rob?

Originally posted by Robtard
Stop lying. I did not imply that at all.

Stop crying in here over your inability to prove AK works somewhere else. Go tear in the proper thread 🙂