Mandrakk(Dax Novu) vs Thanos with IG

Originally posted by Igniz
As for Chaos King, he gets a lot of hate here.

He deserves the hate because he's such a sh|tty character.

As to the thread, Thanos with the Classic IG wins IMHO.

Originally posted by Igniz
The problem with Mandrakk is that its easier to say he beats (insert multiversal DC Character's name here) by eating his/her story.A lot of people assumes Mandrakk's concept of eating stories can also be applied to Marvel Characters.But does Marvel view their story concepts the way DC does?I honestly don't know if Marvel views the story of a character the same way DC does.But it will be false to claim/assume w/o proof that Marvel views their story the same way DC does.And if we apply this to Mandrakk Vs (Insert Multiversal Marvel Character here), who can say Mandrakk will eat a Marvel Multiversal Character's story if no one has proof Marvel views their story concept the same way DC does?There is no character in Marvel who eats a character's story the same way Mandrakk does.If there is, we're not even certain if that is the same concept DC uses.That becomes a problem against Mandrakk.The eating story ability becomes a no limit fallacy if that is also applied to Marvel Characters.And no limits fallacy isn't allowed in the forums.Only panel vs panel discussion is allowed in Vs Forums settings.Take away Mandrakk's eating story concept and just place on panel vs a Marvel Multiversal character's on panel.Mandrakk would suddenly lose his advantage.His lack of appearances becomes a bit of a hindrance to him.The only thing Mandrakk has going for him is statements by other characters and people on every other forum like "he will drain the bleed dry".And only a writer can create a story that destroys a multiverse.I guess Fred Hembeck stomps all then.He's a character and a writer who can destroy a character or an omniverse by writing a story of being killed by Crackers the clown.Only TOAA himself stopped Fred Hembeck(since he's almost TOAA level) from accomplishing this.And if TOAA states "Let my characters(Marvel) be immune to Mandrakk's story eating", what's left for Mandrakk then?

As for Chaos King, he gets a lot of hate here.

But in this forum, mandrakk have defeated many multiversal character. Chaos king is only a example.In this forum, Mandrakk have defeated COIE Antimonitor,Hunger,Spectre,etc. Without Story eating, He is Multi or Metaversal Character,isn't he? You don't like Mandrakk's concept, But many supports Mandrakk's potential. You can say Concept of Story in Marvel is different from DC's. but You can't say Mandrakk's Story eating is nothing. If so, You should say Mandrakk should not be used in Versus Forum.

Originally posted by zopzop
He deserves the hate because he's such a sh|tty character.

As to the thread, Thanos with the Classic IG wins IMHO.

You said Chaos King can stomp Lucifer Morningstar 😂

Originally posted by CatL18
You said Chaos King can stomp Lucifer Morningstar 😂

I know. That doesn't mean he's not a sh|tty character. He's a Nekron wannabe. If only DC could sue.

Originally posted by zopzop
I know. That doesn't mean he's not a sh|tty character. He's a Nekron wannabe. If only DC could sue.

I'm afraid Chaos King is not as strong as Lucifer Morningstar, Mandrakk, even Antimonitor.

Originally posted by CatL18
I'm afraid Chaos King is not as strong as Lucifer Morningstar, Mandrakk, even Antimonitor.

Based on ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Based on ?

Chaos king is a mere aspect of Cosmic Compass. Chaos king consumed countless universe and Pantheon in each universe. But nevertheless, Chaos king is only aspect. Chaos king is far weaker than Cosmic Compass.