Can the Master Sword cut through Sauron's ring ? · Foreign Cinema

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am not here to educate you. I am here to disprove your Fiendfyre destroyed a Horcrux in the film. It didn't.

So you have no defence to say what can and cant? Excellent.

Wait, whats a debate when the opposition can't answer questions? Hmm..

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
So you have no defence to say what can and cant? Excellent.
Wait, whats a debate when the opposition can't answer questions? Hmm..

I am saying Fiendfyre can't destroy one in the films.

I don't have to educate you on the films.

The Scenario Greater Sci-Fi combatant

Originally posted by quanchi112
Cutting Sauron is much easier than cutting his ring. 😂

The Master Sword can cut both, though.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am saying Fiendfyre can't destroy one in the films.
I don't have to educate you on the films.

Aww don't forfeit the debate so soon, you never used to be boring with this :/

If you can't tell me what's required, that's as good as giving up. Play, don't run.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by The Scenario
The Master Sword can cut both, though.

The Master sword couldn't even cut the Executioners sword.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Aww don't forfeit the debate so soon, you never used to be boring with this :/
If you can't tell me what's required, that's as good as giving up. Play, don't run.

I did not. You claimed Fiendfyre can destroy Horcruxes in the films. I just proved you wrong.

The Scenario Greater Sci-Fi combatant

Originally posted by quanchi112
The Master sword couldn't even cut the Executioners sword.

Executioner's Sword isn't evil.

Master Sword destroyed the Twilight Sword.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Originally posted by quanchi112
I did not. You claimed Fiendfyre can destroy Horcruxes in the films. I just proved you wrong.

The only way you could prove you're correct is if you can tell me the requirements.

Otherwise you're only on half the topic here as you can't say what can or can't. Reason for me pressing this question.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by The Scenario
Executioner's Sword isn't evil.
Master Sword destroyed the Twilight Sword.

Dorf is. Dorf wields it. Top isn't evil either just the Wielder. Lol at this backtracking.

It destroyed one sword but failed to destroy another. Not that impressed.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
The only way you could prove you're correct is if you can tell me the requirements.
Otherwise you're only on half the topic here as you can't say what can or can't. Reason for me pressing this question.

I don't need to as I just corrected your claim Fiendfyre can do so in the films. You're wrong there and I proved you wrong. Definitively.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Actually backing up your own side is the raw basics of a debate 😐

I'm asking you to tell me what iyo is required to destroy one. Failing to answer means you haven't countered my argument, besides saying "NOFILMSRAWR" over and over and over.. and over.... and over and over and over again.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Actually backing up your own side is the raw basics of a debate 😐
I'm asking you to tell me what iyo is required to destroy one. Failing to answer means you haven't countered my argument, besides saying "NOFILMSRAWR" over and over and over.. and over.... and over and over and over again.

You said Fiendfyre destroyed one. It didn't. Basilisk fang did so.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Denying that I asked you a question highly entwined in this topic?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Denying that I asked you a question highly entwined in this topic?

I don't have to prove anything. I disproved the Fiendfyre claim.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Refusing to back up your side then?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Refusing to back up your side then?

I posted another video and you proved you are like talking to a brick wall. I already backed my claim that Fiendfyre can't destroy it.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Exactly. You keep saying "can't", even though its in the canon and has never been contradicted, nor has the statements about how to destroy it.

Now, in spite of all this you're saying "can't" as if you know for a 100% fact that if it happened the Horcrux would survive..

..thus the question arises; What, iyo, is the requirements to destroying one?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Exactly. You keep saying "can't", even though its in the canon and has never been contradicted, nor has the statements about how to destroy it.
Now, in spite of all this you're saying "can't" as if you know for a 100% fact that if it happened the Horcrux would survive..
..thus the question arises; What, iyo, is the requirements to destroying one?

No, it isn't since the fang already destroyed it. The same thing happened to the other Horcrux when it interacted with the water after it was released. The water didn't destroy it nor did the fire.

🙂

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

So your reply to "What is needed to destroy a Horcrux" is "No, the water didn't destroy it"?

Are you unable to comprehend a simple question without chanting on about tangent, unrelated points?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
So your reply to "What is needed to destroy a Horcrux" is "No, the water didn't destroy it"?
Are you unable to comprehend a simple question without chanting on about tangent, unrelated points?

Why would he need to strike the Horcrux with the basilisk fang at all if the fire would have destroyed it ? Why not just kick it in there. Do you always ask these kinds of worthless questions.