Herping a derp? In reation to her word on the films, you just said 'we don't know'. Which, tbh, is all I need.
Magic + physical destruction, yeah. Lets see.. if something as simple as a death curse can, and strong flames can, and a strong poisonous fang can.. a strong magical sword will be marvellous.
Originally posted by BloodRainThe fact we don't know proves her word isn't law for the films. That is all I need. 😉
Herping a derp? In reation to her word on the films, you just said 'we don't know'. Which, tbh, is all I need.Magic + physical destruction, yeah. Lets see.. if something as simple as a death curse can, and strong flames can, and a strong poisonous fang can.. a strong magical sword will be marvellous.
Flames never destroyed one in the films. Avada Kedavra destroyed one in the flesh not the same as in an artifact.
Originally posted by quanchi112Copying my lines? Flattering. In relation to her word on the films, you just said 'we don't know'. Cant keep ignoring your words here.
The fact we don't know proves her word isn't law for the films. That is all I need. 😉Flames never destroyed one in the films. Avada Kedavra destroyed one in the flesh not the same as in an artifact.
Magic + physical destruction, yeah that covers it.
Originally posted by BloodRainYou said her word is law. By saying I don't know I proved it isn't with regards to the films.
Copying my lines? Flattering. In relation to her word on the films, you just said 'we don't know'. Cant keep ignoring your words here.Magic + physical destruction, yeah that covers it.
Fang destroyed it whereas the flames interacted with the soul escaping just like the waves of water interacted as well earlier in the film. In both cases the Horcruxes were already destroyed, sport.
Originally posted by BloodRainNo, the fang destroyed it. The soul reacted to the fire just like it reacted to the water after the fang destroyed that one as well.
Again, I asked about her word in relation to the films. You said its uncertain.No, flames destroyed it.
You clearly don't grasp the films. Her word is only law to the books. The movies are entirely different on many different aspects.
I asked a very simple question, one which you replied to. Why are you trying to go back on your word and cover it op with tangents?
Alas it seems the methods to destroying a Horcrux has been stated; You must destroy it on a level where HP magic cannot repair it. E.g the Fiendfyre, AK and Basilisk venom.
Originally posted by BloodRainI am not going back on my word. You aren't making any sense.
I asked a very simple question, one which you replied to. Why are you trying to go back on your word and cover it op with tangents?Alas it seems the methods to destroying a Horcrux has been stated; You must destroy it on a level where HP magic cannot repair it. E.g the Fiendfyre, AK and Basilisk venom.
Fiendfyre never destroyed one in the film. The fang already destroyed it. Restating something when I've already explained and backed my reasoning isn't debating. That is your problem with most of the video game debaters. You are t objective you try to argue against something you're ignorant on which is the definition of bias.
Originally posted by BloodRainWhich applies to the books in both. The scenes for the movies were different. Fiendfyre never destroyed one in the films the fang did in the same manner in which it was destroyed earlier with the soul interacting with the water afterwards.
..Okay. I asked you about her stating that Albus is gay, and what that means for the film. You replied that we cant say either way.Still a fact. And again, we have confirmation about how they're destroyed.
Urm, moan more I guess? /shrugs/
Going by your reasoning the water assisted. 😂