Can the Master Sword cut through Sauron's ring ?

Started by quanchi11221 pages
quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
So something she stated about the franchise, that wasn't in that particular medium, is counted as a fact? Something which is never objected to?
Her word only applies to books not movies. Nothing I said is contradicted. Get over it.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

So he's straight in the films?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
So he's straight in the films?
It isn't addressed so we don't know.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Then it's fair to say you can't contest the idea of the flames destroying one?

More than enough to prove the point.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Then it's fair to say you can't contest the idea of the flames destroying one?

More than enough to prove the point.

I can say her opinion is only relevant to the books not the movies.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

You can, but ya just said you don't know as to Albus. So can't say for sure over this.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
You can, but ya just said you don't know as to Albus. So can't say for sure over this.
I said we don't know. It as never addressed.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Exactly, so you that's your stance on Albus and the flames.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Exactly, so you that's your stance on Albus and the flames.
My point is Rowling's word doesn't mean shit as far as the movies are concerned. This confirms it. Thanks for conceding.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Originally posted by BloodRain
Then it's fair to say you can't contest the idea of the flames destroying one?

More than enough to prove the point.

Simple redirection.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Simple redirection.
My statement was that Rowling's word only applies to the books so your point is moot. As always.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

You just have the 'we don't know' post a min ago.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
You just have the 'we don't know' post a min ago.
The whole we don't know rests on a director tackling the issue. Rowling's opinion only applies to the books. If it didn't we would already have the answer.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Yes, but as with Albus in the films, you dont know either way.

As said, still works to my point that magical + physical destruction is what's needed. Whether it's 3, 3 and a half or 4 methods.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Yes, but as with Albus in the films, you dont know either way.

As said, still works to my point that magical + physical destruction is what's needed. Whether it's 3, 3 and a half or 4 methods.

Point is Rowling doesn't determine what they put into the films.

What are you talking about ?

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Point was that you can't say yay or nay to it's canon status.

The methods to destroying a horcrux.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Point was that you can't say yay or nay to it's canon status.

The methods to destroying a horcrux.

Only canon to the books not the films. That is the point. 🙂 They are different.

God Cloth Seiya Senior Member
Originally posted by quanchi112
Do you realize who I am ?

Guy222

A double account, someone bias, a troll, an idiot. Ive only known you for 2 days and I already know this much about you.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by God Cloth Seiya
Guy222

A double account, someone bias, a troll, an idiot. Ive only known you for 2 days and I already know this much about you.

For some reason I doubt the validity of your words of only knowing me for two days. Guy222 lives in Missouri. I live in Ohio.

God Cloth Seiya Senior Member

Nice cover up.