Khan vs T-1000 vs E Cullen vs T-X vs Voldemort vs ASM

Started by Silent Master14 pages

The important thing is, Khan and Voldy get killed first.

^Nope, Voldy doesn't. It's been the common consensus that he's pretty much the most powerful/versatile member of this match-up.

Agree about Khan though.

He might be more powerful, but he's not even close to being the fastest or most durable.

Originally posted by Robtard
Fight really comes down to who takes on who first, as there's weaker players that are better suited to take down other more powerful characters. eg Khan's gun could likely take out the T-1000, while Edward couldn't take out the T-1000 with his stupid bats, but Edward could easily beat the piss out of Khan with them.

Khan's aim is pretty awful with that gun though. The way he was shooting seemed more like a ragtag nutjob randomly discharging a weapon in all directions and killing everyone around him, rather precision-based targeting of his opponent.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He might be more powerful, but he's not even close to being the fastest or most durable.

Which would be relevant how exactly?

Khan could easily take out Voldermort with his gun, should he target him right when the match starts. It's a wide spread.

Fights like this are pointless without a setting.

^And then Voldemort ends up possessing Edward, thereby combining Edward's superior stats with his magic.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Which would be relevant how exactly?

Well, the people that are faster than Tom are also strong enough to kill him...thus Tommy boy dies.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Well, the people that are faster than Tom are also strong enough to kill him...thus Tommy boy dies.

Lol, you do remember that Voldemort is pretty much unkillable sans the horcruxes, right? Or that upon "dying", he can simply possess another one of his opponents?

Originally posted by Epicurus
Lol, you do remember that Voldemort is pretty much unkillable sans the horcruxes, right? Or that upon "dying", he can simply possess another one of his opponents?

Tom isn't unkillable.

Voldermort is a glass cannon here.

Only two he could conceivably posses would be Khan or ASM.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Tom isn't unkillable.

In this particular thread, he is.

Originally posted by Epicurus
In this particular thread, he is.

No, he isn't.

Originally posted by Robtard
Voldermort is a glass cannon here.

Only two he could conceivably posses would be Khan or ASM.


And Cullen, who is pretty much physically the most formidable opponent in this thread.

Anyways, what prevents Voldemort from burning all of them with a large storm of fiendfyre right in the beginning of the fight? Or confunding the TX and T-1000 into his control? Or imperiuzing the living opponents? Or transfiguring them into saw dust?

Versatility, power and his hax immortality make this Voldy's thread to lose imo.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, he isn't.

He is though. Unless you think that the opponents somehow knew about the horcruxes and destroyed them before the fight?

Originally posted by Epicurus
He is though. Unless you think that the opponents somehow knew about the horcruxes and destroyed them before the fight?

Having horcruxes just means he is able to be brought back to life, they don't stop him from being killed.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Having horcruxes just means he is able to be brought back to life, they don't stop him from being killed.

Having horcruxes means he cannot depart the physical plane, and can still possess other people even after he's been "killed". Which means he is, for all intents and purposes, unkillable.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Having horcruxes means he cannot depart the physical plane, and can still possess other people even after he's been "killed". Which means he is, for all intents and purposes, unkillable.

Except, in part one he was killed and fled the castle...if he could have just possesed someone else, why didn't he?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Except, in part one he was killed and fled the castle...if he could have just possesed someone else, why didn't he?

Because Dumbledore became aware of his presence. Duh.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Because Dumbledore became aware of his presence. Duh.

If Dumbledore could detect possesion, how did Tom go unnoticed for an entire year?