Originally posted by Diesldude
I don't know why you would think that, I actually loved planet hulk and believe it or not, HOM Hulk. You can search my post history and I posted scans from those comics that no one else has.
Originally posted by EpicurusThat's why it can't be anything like a high end feat. Superman simply dug in, went all out and even in a weakened state ripped apart Doomsday in half.
He wasn't weakened in the Probes scene. As I said before. Different circumstances. Different Superman.
Maniping energies which even Galactus couldn't allegedly control is a feat in itself. He did that and then used that juice to kill the Proemial Gods, hence the feat was performed under his own power. Though nice attempt to deflect from the fact that it's a WTF-feat, just like Superman's.Its not HIS own power which killed those. Nice strawman argument as always. Surfer has nothing to do with this thread.
I am not doing anything of the sort. I am dismissing your self-made twist on the feat that Superman holds back in every previous showing. He had to exert quite a bit to do what he did to Doomsday, as the panels themselves showcase.And hence he was going all out just like Pak stated in AC 31. But as you said "dismissing", that's what you're doing here. Dismissing a feat just because you don't like it.
Not holding back, as much as it is him pushing his limits further. This isn't a matter of reading comprehension, just basic English. Come on man.Bwahaha. This is just a terrible case of downplaying. But keep it up, I would see some more strawman arguments soon.
I know he was weakened. So now it's going all out instead of holding back? Listen, not holding back isn't the same thing as what the narrative suggests the character did in this instance. The words "in a never before seen display of brute strength" should be sufficient indicators for that.WTF are you talking about? I always said its him going all out. And that's exactly what the narration states.
It's identical to Goji's ending fight scene against the MUTO.Haven't seen the movie.
TBH, it's a stretch to use this outlierish feat to claim that Superman can easily beat FB.And that's the real motive of all this strawman argument. Dismissing the feat as outlandish, when Superman was in fact weakened and can easily go that level when he is fully powered. But keep going chump.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
Pak isn't writing hulk anymore and from what i hear he's getting his ass kicked by abomination among other far-lesser than green scar showings. big deal.nah. all you house of el people know how each other tastes. huge pass on that
We're not Gammatards gundam. Keep your fantasies to yourself.
Originally posted by Galan007I'll squash this for you. Superman himself, before the fight with Doomsday:
Like I said earlier: 'never before witnessed' by who, exactly? Lois and co.? The earth? The universe? The omniverse? WHO? That is very subjective/ambiguous.An ambiguous, throwaway blurb is EXACTLY what that qualifies as. You're simply trying to glorify that line because you think it makes your pet character look better. Sorry, but that simply isn't sufficient evidence to retcon every single battle Superman has had thus far... Not by a long shot.
If you keep pressing the issue, I'll contact Bada and Pr first thing in the morning and let them squash this. 🙂
"Now it's my turn. To cut loose like never before."
You're welcome.
Nor am I. The fact that AM evidently requires universal amps just to contend with the same Darkseid whom the rookie JL was able to fend off, strikes me as absolutely ridiculous. AM should(and rightfully so) be at the absolute peak of cosmic power. Darkseid shouldn't be even remotely comparable to him. I'm actually surprised that Johns is wanking DS this much.
Originally posted by EpicurusWhen I mention superman-fans, I mean the more ardent ones. Not the neutral dudes like Pr, Zack Fair, JaketheBank and you.
😬
Pr's about as neutral on Superman topics as the Tea Party is concerning taxes.
I'll be the first to say Pr is generally reserved and respectful of people, however, which many of the fans you're calling "ardent" are not.
Originally posted by abhilegend
That's why it can't be anything like a high end feat. Superman simply dug in, went all out and even in a weakened state ripped apart Doomsday in half.Its not HIS own power which killed those. Nice strawman argument as always. Surfer has nothing to do with this thread.
And hence he was going all out just like Pak stated in AC 31. But as you said "dismissing", that's what you're doing here. Dismissing a feat just because you don't like it.
Bwahaha. This is just a terrible case of downplaying. But keep it up, I would see some more strawman arguments soon.
WTF are you talking about? I always said its him going all out. And that's exactly what the narration states. Haven't seen the movie.
And that's the real motive of all this strawman argument. Dismissing the feat as outlandish, when Superman was in fact weakened and can easily go that level when he is fully powered. But keep going chump.
His own power controlled and tamed these energies, which were powerful enough to kill them and were allegedly beyond even Galactus' power. Not per se, but as a comparative analogy of WTF-feats, he is revelant.
I clearly said that I dismiss your notion that he was holding back in prior encounters. Learn to read.
It's not downplaying, as much as it's pointing out something obvious which others agree with me upon. Sorry, but being a crazy-jane insane fanboy like you isn't a crime, last I checked.
No, you said that he holds back in previous encounters based on this single feat. Do you not remember your own posts 2 pages prior in this very thread?
Ugh. Outlier-ish. Not outlandish. Your awful reading comprehension is an insult to the collective intelligence of humanity, and this ridiculous Superman-fueled paranoia is childish. Grow up.
