CosmicComet
Senior Member
Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
You're weak insults aside, I didn't assign a number. Don't tell me not to do something I didn't do. Second, two galaxies would be the low end limit like I said and that's not the same as saying or inferring that he flew past an infinite number of galaxies. You can stop with the verbal gymnastics and keep your no limits fallacy in your pocket.
*Your.
And that's a complete lie on your part, sadly. You did try to assign a number, and you pulled it out of thin air:
You tried to pass off the figure of Gladiator crossing 'billions of light years' even though that was never stated anywhere, and apparently not knowing that our own universe is only estimated at ~90 billion light years in diameter.
Or perhaps worse, you did know all that and wanted carte blanche to just assume as high a number as you could imagine; a free pass to say Gladiator covered a significant portion of the universe.
Too bad on the low end, Galaxies are only hundreds of light years in diameter.
Not even hundreds of thousands (like our own Milky way, which is 100,000, though they can get up to a couple mill), but just mere hundreds for the smaller ones.
Sorry chum. We CAN quantify a minimum, and that minimum doesn't cut the mustard to stand up against the best.
For the sake of completion though, I often see calcs with uncertain upper ends given a 2x cap just to account for a range of uncertainty, which still keeps it within the same magnitude and thus keeps it conservative.
So if you'd like, we can assume it was 2 to 4 galaxies crossed in the blink of an eye.
A great feat for any top tier to have. But not even close to the best. I'm sorry, but that's just being objective.
From a common sense standpoint, if it were just two galaxies, he would have likely said he flew from other galaxy to the currently galaxy.
Not really. Your rewording is not at all at odds with what we are given.
Also, by the art given, Baldur was only looking a galaxy away. We see the swirl of a reddish galaxy in the cosmos, and then you see that reddish swirl in greater detail in his eyes in the very next panel.
Also, you do know there are an unknown # of galaxies, correct?
Not really. We have a quantified estimate for the diameter of the universe and how many galaxies it could contain.
Look at this pic:
I'm looking. What relevance does it contain? Does it mark where Gladiator started and ended?
Now, if he flew through even a small portion of this frame in the span of a blink, he is traveling at unquantifiable speed, PERIOD.
No. It would be quantifiable if we knew what portion, or even if he crossed the entire span of the picture. You just wish it weren't quantifiable so you could apply any speed figure your imagination desires.
The other aspect that is significant to me is the manner in which he casually mentions his feat and begins fighting without a hint of fatigue. This suggests he was no where near his speed limit. I look at that vs. how Flash often does show fatigue and also struggles with his speed based rogues.
Yep, just as I thought. You want carte blanche to assign any figure of your imagination. Instead of taking that as a stamina feat for Gladiator, you want license to assume he was massively holding back his speed.
Except the words used were 'fast enough'. As in, that's the top speed you can expect. There wasn't any addendum to that saying 'fast enough to do this while massively holding back his speed' or anything else.
All this aside...what does Gladiator have to do with Silver Surfer? Their speed feats aren't interchangeable by any editorial fiat that I'm aware of, and this is a Surfer thread.
TL;DR, Glads' speed feat while great,can't come close to competing with the best. And he isn't Surfer anyway.