Originally posted by quanchi112
It isn't Superman then it is Supermans powers. I argue based on their powers and how they fight as characters otherwise its scripting and the character doesn't matter just their powers.
Boo frickity hoo
There's no rule saying they have to fight in character in vs debates, therefore we shouldn't have to unless stated otherwise by the OP. You're not the OP, so yeah
Don't like it, go cry to CBR or MVC
Originally posted by StealthRangerCbr is the powerset place. I debate based on what is fair and what is in character. If you don't want to do so then you eliminate the characters entirely and should seek refuge in cbr.
Boo frickity hooThere's no rule saying they have to fight in character in vs debates, therefore we shouldn't have to unless stated otherwise by the OP. You're not the OP, so yeah
Don't like it, go cry to CBR or MVC
Originally posted by quanchi112
So you acknowledge he needs basic info. It doesn't change the core of Superman.It is greater than I can't even save my gf from a mere earthquake.
Voldemort wins. Superman loses. Get over it.
It looks like he doesn't since morals are off. Superman shoves Voldo's wand up Voldo's ass at ftl speed. Or he goes for my original idea and time travels and bangs Voldo's mum. Take your pick.
But he did save her. Watch the movie.
Superman rapes Voldemort. Literally.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I prove Ak works. If you think it doesn't the onus is on you. I don't have to prove his spell works on someone not in his own universe.Superman gets hurt all the time by missiles, manholes, trucks, etc.
The Ak kills him unless you can prove otherwise.
When did you prove AK works on someone who is invulnerable? Has AK killed someone who is invulnerable or comparable to Superman before, can you show a like comparison using film feats? You're ignoring Superman's powerset.
All you're doing is asserting without proof, "AK kills Superman because I need it to." You failed again.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Tommy boy can control time?
No..,Tommy boy is Time, silly. Voldemort has gadget and spells that can put him into any year he wishes. Superman, however, can do cardio in outer space without breaking a sweat, plus he can turn back time plus move the entire planet out of orbit if he so Chose. So, I don't know who ins here, but it definitely isn't you and I because i'm pretty sure we'll be the oes falling into space as this battle commences. It's Reeves Superman though so, he wins by default because he can do anything, just cuz.
Originally posted by Robtard
When did you prove AK works on someone who is invulnerable? Has AK killed someone who is invulnerable or comparable to Superman before, can you show a like comparison using film feats? You're ignoring Superman's
All you're doing is asserting without proof, "AK kills Superman because I need it to." You failed again.
Aveda kidavra would most certainly kill, Kal el. Magic is his one weakness, however, as I've argued in the past replies, I think, this version of superman, is more of a wizard than Vodemort. Although, no one wants to discuss Supermans magical abilities through out these movies, so I take that as a sign of forfeiture. 😮💨
Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
No..,Tommy boy is Time, silly. Voldemort has gadget and spells that can put him into any year he wishes. Superman, however, can do cardio in outer space without breaking a sweat, plus he can turn back time plus move the entire planet out of orbit if he so Chose. So, I don't know who ins here, but it definitely isn't you and I because i'm pretty sure we'll be the oes falling into space as this battle commences. It's Reeves Superman though so, he wins by default because he can do anything, just cuz.
What do you mean by "put him into any year he wishes" and what spells and gadgets are you talking about?
Originally posted by quanchi112
If we ignore the characters then they aren't the characters just the powersets. This is how I debate everywhere.🙂
Sorry to burst your bubble, but I again say that "being out of character" is not a rule here in the Movie Versus Forum, since it's not stated in the rules.
Your argument is nullified, and you can stop trolling, TYVM.
Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
The time turner device. 😕 I mean, Voldemort is smarter than children right? So, I would imagine he could acquire access to such things...,right? 😂
Tommy boy while book smart is actually rather stupid when it comes to things like tactics and strategy. as for getting a time turner, at no time in any of the books or movies did he ever do so.
Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
Aveda kidavra would most certainly kill, Kal el. Magic is his one weakness, however, as I've argued in the past replies, I think, this version of superman, is more of a wizard than Vodemort. Although, no one wants to discuss Supermans magical abilities through out these movies, so I take that as a sign of forfeiture. 😮💨
This isn't comic Superman, who while is affected by magic, he's still better off against it due to his powers than say a normal person. Though comic Superman would shit-stomp Voldermort even harder than Reeve-Routh's would.
Originally posted by ImpedimentWell, that is fine. I disagree and don't debate that way.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but I again say that "being out of character" is not a rule here in the Movie Versus Forum, since it's not stated in the rules.Your argument is nullified, and you can stop trolling, TYVM.
Since you are throwing your mod weight around I will debate against an out for kill Superman from here on out.
Originally posted by PsychotronShields. Ak. Dead.
It looks like he doesn't since morals are off. Superman shoves Voldo's wand up Voldo's ass at ftl speed. Or he goes for my original idea and time travels and bangs Voldo's mum. Take your pick.But he did save her. Watch the movie.
Superman rapes Voldemort. Literally.
After she died.
Voldemort one shots him literally.
Originally posted by RobtardIt doesn't have anything to do with someone's vulnerability level. That is the point. It doesn't affect their body so vulnerability isn't an issue.
When did you prove AK works on someone who is invulnerable? Has AK killed someone who is invulnerable or comparable to Superman before, can you show a like comparison using film feats? You're ignoring Superman's powerset.All you're doing is asserting without proof, "AK kills Superman because I need it to." You failed again.
Ak kills.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Shields. Ak. Dead.After she died.
Voldemort one shots him literally.
As if those shields could withstand Superman level punches at ftl speeds. And what happens if Superman just goes into space and fries Voldo from there?
Good thing he can time travel without those silly time turners.
You're wrong. Really literally.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It doesn't have anything to do with someone's vulnerability level. That is the point. It doesn't affect their body so vulnerability isn't an issue.Ak kills.
And what do you base that on? You keep dodging this. Not explaining and/or showing a like comparison = you're doing a no limit fallacy again: "AK killed a wizard, so it's just going to kill Superman the same". You're ignoring his powerset.
Lots of things kill, yet a lot of things that kill don't kill Superman cos of his powers.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Well, that is fine. I disagree and don't debate that way.Since you are throwing your mod weight around I will debate against an out for kill Superman from here on out.
Accuse me of "throwing my mod weight around" ever again, and you'll not like the consequences. If you want to pout that you aren't getting your way, then feel free to not come back to the MVF.