Originally posted by quanchi112
He made the claim he is invulnerable to an attack Superman has never shown himself to be invulnerable to. Onus is on him or he will concede like he does in life.
An outright lie.
You claimed Voldermort kills Superman with a spell on page one; I've been asking you to support this claim. You've danced since then 🙂
Originally posted by RobtardAk kills regardless of vulnerability. It magically kills you. It doesn't rip into your flesh or anything so my theory holds true whereas yours doesn't.
An outright lie.You claimed Voldermort kills Superman with a spell on page one; I've been asking you to support this claim. You've danced since then 🙂
Watch the Potter films if you claim the Ak doesn't kill.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Ak kills regardless of vulnerability. It magically kills you. It doesn't rip into your flesh or anything so my theory holds true whereas yours doesn't.Watch the Potter films if you claim the Ak doesn't kill.
Continueing to insist that AK just kills someone who is invulnerable without showing a like comparison isn't proof, it is just assertion without proof.
You claimed to have watched the films, surely you can cite one feat to support your claim, one would think 🙂
Originally posted by RobtardHe can be invulnerable to flesh damaging attacks. The Ak isn't one of those attacks. I have proof the Ak kills. Do you have proof he can resist it ?
Continueing to insist that AK just kills someone who is invulnerable without showing a like comparison isn't proof, it is just assertion without proof.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Why won't any spell hit Superman ?
Like I've stated numerous times: Faster. Than. Light. Speeds.
This Superman is fast enought to fly around the entire planet's equator numerous times per second resulting in reversing the actual rotation of said planet. Even the news casts were heard saying that Superman was in several different places on the planet at once, nodding at FTL speeds.
Voldy aims wand and recites spell......Superman is already gone into the clouds and uses heat/telescopic vision to kill Voldy.
Not enough? Supes can speed blitz Voldy and steal his wand and stick it up Voldy's dick hole. FTL speed to perform a light speed Shoryuken for a KO. FTL speed wins here. Every time. Voldy's spells have a set speed as they emit from his wand. Guess what? Supes dodges.
VOLDEMORT LOSES!!!!
Originally posted by ImpedimentBased on your notions of fighting Usain Bolt can beat Bruce Lee because he can run faster. This is about reflexes not traveling speed.
Like I've stated numerous times: Faster. Than. Light. Speeds.This Superman is fast enought to fly around the entire planet's equator numerous times per second resulting in reversing the actual rotation of said planet. Even the news casts were heard saying that Superman was in several different places on the planet at once, nodding at FTL speeds.
Voldy aims wand and recites spell......Superman is already gone into the clouds and uses heat/telescopic vision to kill Voldy.
Not enough? Supes can speed blitz Voldy and steal his wand and stick it up Voldy's dick hole. FTL speed to perform a light speed Shoryuken for a KO. FTL speed wins here. Every time. Voldy's spells have a set speed as they emit from his wand. Guess what? Supes dodges.
VOLDEMORT LOSES!!!!
Voldemort doesn't need to recite the spell to kill him. Every single attack that has ever hit Superman has been far slower than light attacks.
Voldemort WINS!!!!
Originally posted by quanchi112
He can be invulnerable to flesh damaging attacks. The Ak isn't one of those attacks.I have proof the Ak kills.
Do you have proof he can resist it ?
You must not understand what "invulnerable" means.
You have proof AK can kill a wizard/human, ie someone who isn't invulnerable, so you're doing a no limit fallacy. "AK killed a wizard, it can kill anything."
Again with shifting the burden of proof. I have no problem with Superman's invulnerability not defending against AK. Just show it with proof, not blind fanboy assertions. Would also be nice if you stopped with the all the fallacies, thanks 🙂
i'm going to regret this, i'm sure:
superman is not invulnerable to magic: FACT
mister mxyzptlk proved this many times. it can be well argued that superman was never harmed by mxyzptlk simply because he was a prankster who only wanted to troll superman.
however this DC incarnation of 'magic' is on par with 'Q' from ST:TNG, having near omnipotent power to alter reality at the snap of a finger. regardless, it was magic and superman was clearly physically vulnerable to mxyzptlk's will.
WITH THAT SAID, and as imp said, the nature and application potterverse "magic" is laughable to superman's ability to not even be touched by it.
superman massively butt rapes. but he IS technically vulnerable to magic. just sayin. now lets all watch quimchi act like he knew this.
Originally posted by RobtardYes, it means he is immune to the attacks but you have offered no proof to suggest he can tank the Ak.
You must not understand what "invulnerable" means.You have proof AK can kill a wizard/human ie someone who isn't invulnerable, so you're doing a no limit fallacy. "AK killed a wizard, it can kill anything."
Again with shifting the proof. I have no problem with Superman's invulnerability not defending against AK. Just show it with proof, not blind fanboy assertions 🙂
The wizards bodies aren't physically affected either. They look fine but are dead. The same thing happens to Superman unless you can prove otherwise.
You concede. Wonderful.
Originally posted by ImpedimentThe quote I referenced aka the Usain Bolt was Batman comparing Superman to Wonderwoman reflexes in a dc comic iirc. That Superman has greater flying feats so again I support the differences and traveling speed is not the same as fighting speed.
His flight IS a reaction/reflex speed!Why do you love to trollololololol? It's pathetic.
Voldemort wins.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, it means he is immune to the attacks but you have offered no proof to suggest he can tank the Ak.The wizards bodies aren't physically affected either. They look fine but are dead. The same thing happens to Superman unless you can prove otherwise.
You concede. Wonderful.
Look up the definition of "invulnerable", it doesn't say "except for AK" 🙂
More assertions without proof and no limit fallacies. "It killed a wizard, so it can kill anything." You're literally the weakest debater in all of KMC. Watch the bullet to the eye scene, bullet never touches his body, it crushes against his protective aura 🙂
And a silly troll/dodge tactic cos you can't debate with logic. That means you know you lost.
There are creatures in Harry Potter verse who are resistant to magic. And what's the thing they have in common? Tough skin. Giants, Troll's, Dragons, etc... Even the half human Hagrid is mostly resistant to spells and they were bouncing off of him like he had a reflector shield. If you think Clark doesn't fall in that category, you're trolling.
Originally posted by ImpedimentThats exactly what he did. He traveled as fast as he can because he wasn't fast enough to save Lois. I can run a lot faster than I can fight. I can also run out of the way of objects but that doesn't mean anything in a fight.
Now you're comparing travel speed to reaction speed in a last ditch effort to save your pummeled argument? Wow.Keep tap dancing, son.