Superman vs Voldermort · Movie Versus Forum

Firefly218 Restricted

Supes rapes

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Psychotron
As if those shields could withstand Superman level punches at ftl speeds. And what happens if Superman just goes into space and fries Voldo from there?
Good thing he can time travel without those silly time turners.
You're wrong. Really literally.

Why couldn't they ? What is his most impressive feat of punching ?

Voldemort can fly. 😂

Nah, I'm right. Voldemort can possess him also.

😂

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
And what do you base that on? You keep dodging this. Not explaining and/or showing a like comparison = you're doing a no limit fallacy again: "AK killed a wizard, so it's just going to kill Superman the same". You're ignoring his powerset.
Lots of things kill, yet a lot of things that kill don't kill Superman cos of his powers.

Durability has nothing to do with this spell. Physical objects can hit Superman so can magical bolts designed to kill.

Ak kills him. Oneshot.

Silent Master Senior Member

Originally posted by Impediment
Wrong. There is no rule about "being out of character", so you can ditch that angle right now. Supes flies into the clouds and vaporizes Voldy with heat vision.

I agree.

Robtard Senor Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
Durability has nothing to do with this spell. Physical objects can hit Superman so can magical bolts designed to kill.
Ak kills him. Oneshot.

IOW, you can't prove that AK will just kill someone with Superman's invulnerability so you'll continue to insist without proof. "It killed a wizard, so it can kill Superman."

Not that it matters, since it'd never hit. The man can travel at FTL as seen in Superman and Returns.

Psychotron Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why couldn't they ? What is his most impressive feat of punching ?
Voldemort can fly. 😂
Nah, I'm right. Voldemort can possess him also.
😂

The guy can lift islands. What's Voldemort's beast shield feat?

Not as fast as Superman.

If Voldemort was that good he wouldn't have lost to Dumbledore.

Impediment Endless

No spell will hit Superman.

FTL speed.

Why, oh, why can't Quanchi see this? It's getting to be pitiful now.

Robtard Senor Member

Cos Aspergers

Psychotron Senior Member

Originally posted by Robtard
Cos Aspergers

You mean Assburgers?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW, you can't prove that AK will just kill someone with Superman's invulnerability so you'll continue to insist without proof. "It killed a wizard, so it can kill Superman."
Not that it matters, since it'd never hit. The man can travel at FTL as seen in Superman and Returns.

Superman just has very high durability. The spell doesn't hurt the body at all. The spell hits Superman all the same. You're comparing a magical attack with a physical attack. Apples and oranges, kiddo.

What's your point ?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Impediment
No spell will hit Superman.
FTL speed.
Why, oh, why can't Quanchi see this? It's getting to be pitiful now.

Why won't any spell hit Superman ?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Psychotron
The guy can lift islands. What's Voldemort's beast shield feat?
Not as fast as Superman.
If Voldemort was that good he wouldn't have lost to Dumbledore.

Lifting isn't punching and he was sun amped.

He doesn't need to be,

He didn't lose to Dumbledore.

😂

Robtard Senor Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
Superman just has very high durability. The spell doesn't hurt the body at all. The spell hits Superman all the same. You're comparing a magical attack with a physical attack. Apples and oranges, kiddo.
What's your point ?

You're ignoring "invulnerability" again.

Can't you read?

Robtard Senor Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
Lifting isn't punching and he was sun amped.

Still with this lie. Superman was in fact weaker than normal when lifting the island, since he had kryptonite in him and was surrounded by it.

Source of this claim: Superman Returns 🙂

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
You're ignoring "invulnerability" again.
Can't you read?

When has he shown himself to be invulnerable to magical attacks ? You made a claim so back it up.

I wish you understood the simple nuances of a debate.

focus4chumps Restricted

oh look quimchi is peddling his "shift the burden of proof " fallacy for attention again.

Robtard Senor Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
When has he shown himself to be invulnerable to magical attacks ? You made a claim so back it up.
I wish you understood the simple nuances of a debate.

When has he shown himself to not be invulnerable to magical attacks? He's invulnerable; you claimed AK will kill him regardless of that, you need to prove it 🙂 Stop shifting the burden of proof.

I wish you understood.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by focus4chumps
oh look quimchi is peddling his "shift the burden of proof " fallacy for attention again.

He made the claim he is invulnerable to an attack Superman has never shown himself to be invulnerable to. Onus is on him or he will concede like he does in life.

focus4chumps Restricted

Originally posted by Robtard

I wish you understood.

no you don't 🙂

what would be the fun in that?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
When has he shown himself to not be invulnerable to magical attacks? He's invulnerable; you claimed AK will kill him regardless of that, you need to prove it 🙂 ie stop shifting the burden
I wish you understood.

So you're riding an infinite fallacy. Oh the irony. He has shown himself to be invulnerable to the attacks he has suffered none of which were magical in nature.

Ak kills. The spell hits him and kills him. Superman's skin tissue looks fine in the casket.

🙂