Originally posted by Stoic
Well if we use this type of thinkng Thanos has to be stronger than Superman, because I don't see Superman standing there after getting Mjolnir clubbed upon his head. Thanos wasn't thrown for a loop. Superman has been seen tossed around by far less than Thor. If you could lift 10 tons, this means that you become more durable than someone that only lifts 200 lbs. Thanos took Thor's hit like Thor was far weaker than he was. Do you know why that is?
Superman is weak against magic. Mjolnir is magical just like CM's fists.
Superman has tanked shit beyond an average Mjolnir slam.
Although strength and blunt durability can possibly have a positive correlation they are really two different things. Someone can be durable as hell but not have the power output to exert astronomical forces.
Seeing things in your mind is not proof. I can see a high end, very serious, and calm as hell Superman no selling Thanos punches, but that's just my imagination running wild and not proof.
Being tossed around doesn't prove strength. These characters weigh almost nothing in comparison to their strength. I saw Spidey toss around beings much stronger than himself.
I see why you want to look at 1 showing vs. history. Thanos has been hit for a loop by Thor and others multiple times. Even Masterson Thor phucked Thanos up pretty bad. But let's ignore that in favor of the 1 showing (what I like). Thor hit downward on Thanos. How could Thanos be knocked away like that? Mjolnir obviously hurt Thanos because he caught the second hit instead of tank another and precede to beat the shit out of Thor.
Originally posted by DarkRaidenThanos feats count. But to take a character's highest feats and suggest they was operating at that level against Thanos or in any showing you like is plain trolling. I can name Superman's highest showings and lie and say he was operating at that level when he almost killed Batman. That would suggest that Batman has mega star level durability. This is ridiculous and just trolling.
So....basically when Thor and Surfer do things they don't count but when Lobo and Supes do things they do? And I'm the one being reported for trolling? right....
If you really believe Thanos is stronger then use sound reasoning to support it and let's stop the con games and trying to twist shit to your liking.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
Think il go ahead and report you too for continuing to use unsupported claims you use despite been proven wrong.Go ahead and prove PG was only twice as strong.
Thanos matched Tryant and as for the so called advantage Thanos had Tyrant was taller than Thanos
A character doesn't have an ability until their is strong evidence to support it.
I can't say Spidey can lift more than 10 tons unless I have proof. If no proof exists, then he can't or it is unfounded.
PG Thor has no feats that supports him being more than twice as strong as his normal NON HOLDING BACK SELF. So why should I accept that he was stronger than 2x his normal self?
You make a claim, you must prove it. Supporting Thanos by mentioning the PG Thor fight is really claiming that Thor was operating beyond 2x his normal self. Where's the proof? It doesn't exist but rather evidence to the opposite exist. Thus Thor wasn't operating at beyond 2x strength.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
I've already proven it, he busted Thanos face 3 three punches , and he's never done that damage with more hammer shots. Point proven
He's never hit Thanos more than 3 times in a single comic outside the PG arc. Also comics in the past didn't show much blood. Characters were killed or koed without 1 ounce of blood shown. Hulk got knocked the phuck out a few times without any blood. In WWH, Thing busted the shit out of Hulk's face (lot's of blood). Sometimes lack of blood isn't evidence for lack of damage (if other evidence exists).
Originally posted by Insane Titan
How surprising Ahbi ignores context
http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/ThorvsThanos1.jpg
But let me guess, that doesn't counts somehow?
Originally posted by abhilegendthe context of Thanos giving the Heroes a chance and putting on a shown for Death They were Thanos own words.
The context that Thanos only cut off his sensory input and then this happened?http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/ThorvsThanos1.jpg
But let me guess, that doesn't counts somehow?
Spider-Man had more effect than any blast the cosmically did , you're not that guilable are you?
Originally posted by Insane Titan
the context of Thanos giving the Heroes a chance and putting on a shown for Death They were Thanos own words.Spider-Man had more effect than any blast the cosmically did , you're not that guilable are you?
Gamora drew blood from Thanos and Thor didn't. Gamora must be stronger than Thor, amirite?
Originally posted by abhilegendthat was the chance of them winning not letting Thanos effect them , that's a big difference when you're trying to act like your safety is in jeopardy.
The chance was only .08% or something. He wasn't down just to show for Death.Gamora drew blood from Thanos and Thor didn't. Gamora must be stronger than Thor, amirite?
Lol Gamora never drew blood at all, if you're talking about the sparring it was spittle from been him in the throat/wind pipe .
Did you even read comics in question
Originally posted by Insane TitanAnd what does that tells you? Thanos was still extremely powered up and Thor still downed him with a hammer throw.
that was the chance of them winning not letting Thanos effect them , that's a big difference when you're trying to act like your safety is in jeopardy.
Lol Gamora never drew blood at all, if you're talking about the sparring it was spittle from been him in the throat/wind pipe .I'm sure its just spit.
Who knew Thanos' spit is red?
Did you even read comics in questionClassic nihilist.
