Georges Batroc vs Batman

Originally posted by FrothByte
I never said McClane wins over Batman. Now back to the topic: Whom has Batman defeated that compares with Batroc?

You spite has already been revealed, your answers are biased and once sided. You really screwed up with trying to low ball Batman with this loser and then say John McClane can beat him in a H2H, from now on I'll understand you spite perspective as it holds no bearing on a legitimate fight because its based on hating Batman and ignoring all feats and then undercutting his feats with lesser ones.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
You spite has already been revealed, your answers are biased and once sided. You really screwed up with trying to low ball Batman with this loser and then say John McClane can beat him in a H2H, from now on I'll understand you spite perspective as it holds no bearing on a legitimate fight because its based on hating Batman and ignoring all feats and then undercutting his feats with lesser ones.

Oh please, stop making stuff up. You're embarrassing yourself. I never said McClane can beat Batman. And that's not a spite thread, I actually think it's a close fight. If I wanted to spite Batman I would have made a Captain America vs. Batman thread.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Oh please, stop making stuff up. You're embarrassing yourself.

How could I be embarrassed by talking about hypothetical fiction comic movie based fights that have never taken place with other comic book movie nerds..

If I was to be embarrassed on the internet by this it would be from siding with a guy who has zero feats and a 30 second quick job from France vs the Dark Knight from Gotham in speaking of comics.

With Snyder doing the action in BvsS I expect Batfleck going full Arkham combo gameplay mode on fools.

I LOVE the nolan trilogy, but the action was not the best part of it

Originally posted by TH3_V01D
With Snyder doing the action in BvsS I expect Batfleck going full Arkham combo gameplay mode on fools.

I LOVE the nolan trilogy, but the action was not the best part of it

Ben isn't capable of that level of action.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Ben isn't capable of that level of action.

Thats why its called a movie, child.

Ben Affleck was already Daredevil...soooo yeah.

Originally posted by KingD19
Ben Affleck was already Daredevil...soooo yeah.

Exactly, his fights weren't that great in DD and that was over 10 years ago.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Exactly, his fights weren't that great in DD and that was over 10 years ago.

God knows people can't get better or evolve and become better. One day you will understand evolution.

yes but people also get older

Originally posted by maxivitopowe
yes but people also get older

Yes but some people get better with age.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Exactly, his fights weren't that great in DD and that was over 10 years ago.

Originally posted by NemeBro
There are these things called stunt doubles. Perhaps you've heard of them?

I've heard of them, but actors in action movies these days try and do as much of their own fighting and stunts as possible and Ben just doesn't have it in him anymore.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
None of those are as fast as Spiderman, except Venom.

Ocks have arms outmaneuvered Spidey in both the comics in the movies plenty of times. They are as fast reacting/moving.

Lizard and Venom are as fast, and significantly stronger/more deadly and the Spidey sense doesn't even work against Venom which gives a pretty big advantage.

Sandman had his area attacks.

Rhino is the only one who's no where near as fast, but he's many times stronger.

Spidey's villains were all created to be more powerful than he was in the comics. That's why he always had to use his head to defeat them. He does that. That's Spidey's entire thing. He can rarely ever win in straight fisticuffs. Even Kraven started off faster than Spidey and was able to outmaneuver the shit out of him the first couple of times they fought in comics. Saying Spideys villains are physically inferior to him is just plain out wrong.

Originally posted by Arachnid1
Goblin matches Spidey in speed in strength. He always has in the comics, and he did in the movie.

Ocks have arms outmaneuvered Spidey in both the comics in the movies plenty of times. They are as fast reacting/moving.

Lizard and Venom are as fast, and significantly stronger/more deadly and the Spidey sense doesn't even work against Venom which gives a pretty big advantage.

Sandman had his area attacks.

Rhino is the only one who's no where near as fast, but he's many times stronger.

Spidey's villains were all created to be more powerful than he was in the comics. That's why he always had to use his head to defeat them. He does that. That's Spidey's entire thing. He can rarely ever win in straight fisticuffs. Even Kraven started off faster than Spidey and was able to outmaneuver the shit out of him the first couple of times they fought in comics. Saying Spideys villains are physically inferior to him is just plain out wrong.

Goblins speed and agility and strength feats do not match Spiderman's nor is he anywhere as strong.

Ozy's claws are slower then him that is why he needs eight of them to try and keep him in check.

Lizard/Venom are the only ones fast and strong enough, even though I think Spiderman is faster then Lizard.

Sandman was trading blows with him without area of attacks.

He has not faced Rhino yet, so I'm not going to talk about that.

as fast, as strong has slight edge in mobility

4, as fast

as fast, as strong/slightly stronger

first fight he won by blasting sand at Spidey

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Goblins speed and agility and strength feats do not match Spiderman's nor is he anywhere as strong.

Ozy's claws are slower then him that is why he needs eight of them to try and keep him in check.

You have no proof of these...

Originally posted by maxivitopowe
as fast, as strong has slight edge in mobility

4, as fast

as fast, as strong/slightly stronger

first fight he won by blasting sand at Spidey

Originally posted by FrothByte
You have no proof of these...

Keep trying fan boys, Batman still wins no matter how hard you wanna low ball. I guess Bane was slower and weaker then Batman as well from your point of view.

Originally posted by FrothByte
You have no proof of these...

Like you said I had no proof of stone columns being made or stone or concrete?

Originally posted by Silent Master
I've heard of them, but actors in action movies these days try and do as much of their own fighting and stunts as possible and Ben just doesn't have it in him anymore.

Are you the security guard at some backlot in hollywood who gives the pass on entrance and if the particular actor gives you a tip or talks to you for longer then 2 seconds you give them a good review on KMC? You literally have no idea what your talking about or have seen half the movies you talking about.

Nor have you seen the upcoming Batman movie and your already making assumptions about things in which you have no idea about. Ever heard of don't put the cart before the horse? If you wanna go learn how to do kick flips and children's tumble rolls go learn how to do gymnastics at the local YMCA. 😆 😆