Georges Batroc vs Batman

Originally posted by KingD19
I never said he couldn't fight without the suit. I said he's not Batman without the suit. Without the suit and gadgets that come from being Batman, how much could he have accomplished?

Probably a lot more. As Wayne, he could have used his rediculous fortune and social standing to hire top-tier mercs to carry out his will, influenced lawmakers, paid off police departments etc.

As Foxx said: "your client, one of the wealthiest, most powerful men in the world"

That's obvious. I meant in the same scenarios without his suit. Not just using common sense.

Tony really put Steve steroids Rogers in his place in the ''who are you without the suit'' discussion

Originally posted by TH3_V01D
Tony really put Steve steroids Rogers in his place in the ''who are you without the suit'' discussion

Lol, yea considering Tony's dad put the steroids in Rogers🙂 Tony had him beat on both ends.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
What feats? He was on screen for 30 seconds. Keep dreaming man. Batman crushed a van with his body and walked away from it.

Batroc looked more agile and atheletic in those 30 seconds.
Bats could also win though, with that badass suit.

I would actually say 50-50

BTW, Steve learned some awesome fighting techniques. I bet even without the serum he wouldn't be a complete pushover.

Originally posted by Mindset
Batroc is too fast and too strong.

^
Truth.