Nomi Sunrider Respect Thread

Started by Beniboybling54 pages

Originally posted by Nephthys
That's an obvious and classic hyperbolic exaggeration. That phrase is used to describe human-speed characters in books, it's not a legit speed feat. Plus look at the context, it's describing Dooku's skill, not his speed.

So Obi-Wan's 1 lightsaber is literally 4 times as fast as any one of Grievous'? Don't be ridiculous. Obi-Wan deals with Grievous through skill, not sheer speed. In the same book Obi-Wan explicitly claims Grievous is faster than he is.

Yes, Grievous is increasing his speed there. But he's still only as fast as he would be if he only had one lightsaber. Which is 5 strikes her second only.

Wookieepedia isn't a source.

And Yoda being wounded at the start of the fight.

"Bane didn't take the time to revel in the fear of his fallen enemies. Before they even hit the ground he'd turned his attention to the third opponent, unleashing a storm of Sith lightning that reduced the riders to ash and the drexl into a hunk of charred and smoking flesh that dropped from the sky." -RoT

"He didn't stay down, however. He sprang back to his feet, simultaneously drawing his lightsaber with his right hand as he sent a blast of lightning out from the fingertips of his left. The violet bolts should have incinerated all four of his targets on the balcony, yet again the strange power interfering with his ability to draw upon the Force hindered his efforts." - DoE

"The Iktotchi landed just as Bane unleashed a wave of crackling electricity that burned away the webbing of the tangle guns." - DoE

"He met their assault with an explosion of crackling energy that rippled out in a violet wave from his body at the center.

The incoming bolts were absorbed harmlessly into the ionic storm, the blasters themselves melted in the hands of their owners. The stench of burned flesh mingled with their screams of agony and the relentless, hammering song of the alarms, further feeding Bane's power." - DoE

"Turning her head to follow the course of the misguided bolt, Zannah saw where the first had hit the wall. The stone had been disintegrated in a fist-sized hole, revealing something that looked like bright red plastic beneath it." - DoE

It may not be a deal closer, but it's an important factor that Bane is clearly superior in. Dooku's never shown the ability to deflect lightning that powerful, so I can easily suggest Bane's lightning would eff him up. Plus didn't you suggest just yesterday that lightning is an indication of overall power?

Bane didn't disintegrate the technobeasts with lightning, he did it with TK:

"Bane thrust out with the Force, and a dozen of the oncoming creatures exploded into dust and tiny flecks of small, twisted metal........ That enemy vanquished, he used the Force to disintegrate two more advancing technobeasts" -RoT

I find Quinlan Vos' lameness more disturbing.

So Bane wins by default. excellent

I think you mean stone, not steel and as I posted above, Bane is capable of disintegrating metal which is a great deal more powerful than merely breaking a part of a metal structure.

What? Bane did collapse the whole building. The archway falls and then the rest of the roof follows it. You say Dooku's feat is better but it blatantly isn't. The amount of force needed to utterly obliterate stone is more than is needed to simply break a metal object that's already supporting its own weight plus the amount he destroyed it vaaaaaaaastly more than Dooku did. All Dooku did was pull down a scaffold, Bane destroyed a massive building.

My point was that he clearly can't effortlessly dominate her like he did on Vjun. [/B]

1. Please explain to me how it is any more hyperbolic than the statement that Bane appeared to be wielding 12 sabers at once which is obviously hyperbole as he has but one?

Also explain how skill alone could make one's lightsaber appear to be everywhere.

2. Considering Kenobi was overwhelmed, no. If Kenobi was not overwhelmed though also no, however it would mean he comes pretty darn close as he effectively has to be in almost twenty places at once. Anyway you've contradicted yourself here. You say that Grievous could strike 20 times per second with one saber, yet simultaneously claim that with one saber he can only strike 5 times per second. So are you admitting that the more lightsabers Grievous has the more times he can strike per second or what?

3. I don't recall Yoda being wounded, but I'm not trying to put Dooku on the same level as Yoda. He doesn't need to be on that level to even match Bane.

4. Thank you. And I suggested that it was an indication of overall power if there was no evidence to suggest that those being compared were lacking, a fully accept that powerful Force Users just don't have that much of an affinity/training in lightning, or in perhaps this case, a more reserved use of it, or a combination of all.

And no you couldn't. See #4.

5. Well I'm not going to push that point because I'm not an expert on Vos, and we always have Ventress, Kenobi and Sora.

4. An absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. 😉

5. With TK?

Anyway Dooku did not just break off a piece and let if fall. Look closely:

The bridge begins nowhere near the transport, yet it falls right on top of it. In order to achieve that effect Dooku would have had to influence the entire structure and move it a considerable distance.

Again said metal bridge would have weighed more than that stone archway, meaning Dooku could have easily collapsed it. Especially considering he has collapsed a cave before.

Admittedly shockwave feats aren't directly comparable to manipulation feats. But considering the same effect is achieved the energy output is likely similar.

That said I'd rather draw attention to the fact that this massive shockwave wasn't even enough to break through Kas'im's Force shield. Even if we take into account the fact that Bane's powers increased since then, Dooku could do that with a flick of his wrist.

And no, he did not collapse the temple himself. He collapsed the archway and without its support the roof caved in.

6. And my point is he can. Easily. Very easily.

Hmm

Originally posted by Nephthys
You must be reading a different book from the rest of humanity then, because for the rest of us a single instant in less than a second in terms of measurements of time.
Again, it "appeared" if one were to strike 12 times per second, it would appear they were wielding 12 blades at once. The human mind can't possibly comprehend split-seconds. If it did not say appeared, I would concur, but is does not so I do not. It is not literal

Originally posted by NewGuy01
I found it! Took like an hour of searching, but it was worth it. 😛

“Anakin, as Skywalker, as a human being, was going to be extremely powerful,” he says. “But he ended up losing his legs and an arm and became partly a robot. So a lot of his ability to use the Force, a lot of his powers, are curbed at this point, because, as a living form, there’s not that much of him left. So his ability to be twice as good as the Emperor disappeared, and now he’s maybe 20 percent less than him. So that isn’t what the Emperor had in mind. He wanted this really super guy, but that got derailed by Obi-Wan. So he finds that, with Luke, he can get a more primo version if he can turn Luke to the Dark Side. You’ll see, as this goes on, Luke is faced with the same issues and practically the same scenes that Anakin is faced with. Anakin says yes and Luke says no.”

-George Lucas, "The Last Battle" Vanity Fair Magazine

Thanks, the effort is appreciated. Now I'll try and slap this on Wookieepedia and laugh at the irony as they take it down.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
I found it! Took like an hour of searching, but it was worth it. 😛

“Anakin, as Skywalker, as a human being, was going to be extremely powerful,” he says. “But he ended up losing his legs and an arm and became partly a robot. So a lot of his ability to use the Force, a lot of his powers, are curbed at this point, because, as a living form, there’s not that much of him left. So his ability to be twice as good as the Emperor disappeared, and now he’s maybe 20 percent less than him. So that isn’t what the Emperor had in mind. He wanted this really super guy, but that got derailed by Obi-Wan. So he finds that, with Luke, he can get a more primo version if he can turn Luke to the Dark Side. You’ll see, as this goes on, Luke is faced with the same issues and practically the same scenes that Anakin is faced with. Anakin says yes and Luke says no.”

-George Lucas, "The Last Battle" Vanity Fair Magazine


This has got to be the worst thing in Star Wars history, especially since he just pulled this numbers out of his ass.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Thanks, the effort is appreciated. Now I'll try and slap this on Wookieepedia and laugh at the irony as they take it down.

If you want, I can also give you a source link to slap on so they can't question it's validity lol.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
If you want, I can also give you a source link to slap on so they can't question it's validity lol.
That would be great thanks.

Guess Legend wasn't so eager for that response.

He's also not on very much, so that may also be a cause.

Here's the link, by the way:
http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/features/2005/02/star-wars-george-lucas-story

It's on page 3.

There are a bunch of great quotes from that article, many of which I've referenced often, such as George's opinion on Hayden and Anakin:

"Throughout Attack of the Clones, Anakin is an impatient, arrogant teen, with great powers beneath a James Dean pout. Audiences who had expected a more heroic protagonist—someone like the easy-to-root-for farm boy Luke Skywalker—may have been confused by this sullen kid, who is alternately boastful and whining. Lucas believes Christensen took an unfair hit from critics and fans merely for carrying out what was in the script. “Poor Hayden,” he says. “His performance is amazing. They just don’t like the character.”

When the script demands:

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Don't worry, I haven't forgotten about you.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
1. Good, now that your back in your cave lets collapse the entrance.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
2. The definition of a Force Nexus is as follows:

...any location where the Force, or any particular aspect of the Force, was unusually strong.

--Wookieepedia

Unless you have a conflicting source. Dromund Kaas is unusually strong in the Force for a planet, it is therefore a DS nexus. End of discussion.

As I explained to Neph, nothing happened on Kaas in current continuity that could have transformed it into a DS nexus, to assume that it did on no basis is to invite fanon. And we have no basis. Especially considering the following facts:

1. The entire planet is shrouded in lightning, Odile Vaiken discovered a Teratentaek on the world when it was first colonised and every species on the planet is hostile and deadly - common traits of planets that have become Force Nexuses.

2. The planet has long since existed under the reign of the ancient Sith Empire, who made Korriban and Ziost into DS nexuses simply by being their. Kaas likely shared their fate.

3. The Sith Emperor empowered the nexus further by building the Sith Temple and infecting the entire ionosphere with Sith Magic.

3. The HoloNet says the following:

...the planet is bristling with the energy of the dark side.

Need I go on?

The fact that BioWare does not acknowledge/describe it as a nexus does not change the fact it definitively is, and that any dark sider on its surface would be empowered by some measure - if they were capable of tapping into the energies.

To assume otherwise is plainly illogical.

Nobody is of course saying its as powerful as the nexus that is the Sith Temple.


Key term is "unusually."

Places such as Dark Temple and Dark Force Temple are "unusually" strong in the dark side, therefore both are officially recognized as a nexus of dark side energy. These places are surging with dark side energy to such an extent that they can have an impact on living beings visiting them.

1. Some planets have harsh environmental conditions and dangerous fauna; Tatooine is an example. These conditions do not imply nexus.

2. I acknowledge that Dromund Kaas have been strong in the dark side on the whole due to actions of Sith. However, presence does not guarantees nexus conditions. Sith have inhabited many planets and all of them did not became nexus of dark side. Korriban's history is much more complex then mere presence of Sith.

3. Yes, Sith Emperor is responsible for influencing the environment of (entire) Dromund Kaas; this planet became 'strong' in the dark side due to Emperor's dark side practices. He is also responsible for creating nexus(es) of dark side energies in some regions of this planet; Dark Temple is an example.

Look, it is important to understand what constitutes as a nexus. Nexus(es) are mostly officially defined. Fan-led speculation can be wrong.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
4. I never said older sources are meritorious that newer ones, I said the date in which a source is produced is totally irrelevant - all that matters is there level of canon. KOTOR II and the Revan novel exist on the same levels of canon, therefore neither is superior.

However the Revan novel creates illogical inconsistencies, which I and others have provided solutions for. And yes it is an inconsistency as it portrays Traya to be ridiculously weak despite her surpassing Nyriss in terms of abilities. Considering how many disadvantages the Exile had in that final confrontation.


Inconsistencies are an unfortunate aspect of Star Wars mythos since multiple authors contribute to it and they sometimes are not careful at linking different stories. Inconsistencies aside, SWTOR is actually based on KoTOR II.

As far as capabilities of characters are concerned, you make it sound like as if Darth Traya is canonically stronger then Darth Nyriss; this isn't the case. Admittedly not much is known about Darth Nyriss at the moment but she wasn't a rookie, she was heavily involved in dark side practices and acquired a position in the Dark Council which is not an easy accomplishment for Sith in general.

I really don't get the supposed disadvantageous position of Meetra Surik in Dromund Kaas either. She have canonically demonstrated the capability to cope well with environments strong in the dark side as apparent from her actions in Korriban, Malachor V and Dromund Kaas.

Keep in mind that Meetra Surik was a 'wound in the Force' during the events of Sith Triumvirate, she benefitted from this condition during her confrontations with Darth Nihilus and Darth Traya; she wouldn't have survived in these confrontations otherwise. She is undoubtedly a powerful Jedi as apparent from her numerous performances but she isn't entitled to be equal of Revan, I don't think Mr. Avellone ever stated this.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
5. That's the issue, your points are invalid. Such as the argument that the Sith Emperor could collapse the Citadel because it was destroyed during a Kaggath by two DC members, which is frankly laughable.

My points are most often valid, if not always. It's not unusual or unheard of Emperor's inferior to collapse structures including whole buildings.

Darth Malgus once encountered a Jedi who collapsed two buildings around the Sith Lord's position in an attempt to crush Sith Lord beneath the heavy rubble.

Honest question: If the referred Jedi can collapse buildings with his powers, why cannot Emperor who is confirmed to be the most powerful Force-user in the galaxy?

My point about Emperor's potential to collapse structures (including buildings) with his powers is absolutely valid. His apprentice collapsed large structures during her battle against Darth Thanaton.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
6. Elaborate. And if you which to respond do so here.

Noted, will do.

And I hope that you will give importance to my valid points.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
7. Yes this one:

However, after all of his limbs were severed and he was extremely burned on Mustafar he lost much of his Force potential. As Darth Vader, Skywalker was believed to have had roughly 80% of the strength of the Emperor. Had he sustained none of his injuries on Mustafar he would have been twice as powerful.

--George Lucas

Unless you have some reason to doubt George Lucas's claims?


Statements such as these carried weightage when Mr. Lucas owned Star Wars, no more.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Revan's less than impressive performance against the Sith Emperor proves that he was dwarfed in power by Sidious. Considering Sidious himself claimed Vader would be capable of killing him.

Erm, what?

Revan's performance against Emperor Vitiate is very impressive actually. Keep in mind that Emperor Vitiate is so powerful that he have been touted as a godlike being and have easily subdued Strike Teams of 'powerful' Force-users; at one point, he defeated a Strike Team of 12 Sith Lords. Emperor Vitiate would have defeated the trio of Revan, Meetra and Scourge as well.

Emperor Vitiate have fought and literally pwned hundreds of opponents in history and performance of Revan's caliber is a rare occurrence against him.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
8. Do you realise how heavy those asteroids where? Clearly not, here is someone who actually does. He estimates the weight of the asteroids to be on average half a tonne.

Half a tonne?

Mass of Asteroid 1 = 384,822.9 kg

Mass of Asteroid 2 = 527,153.4 kg

Mass of Asteroid 3 = 370,415.7 kg

OP didn't calculate mass of other asteroids but they are within the aforementioned range as well.

FACT: 1 ton = 1000 kg

Do the math.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Vader has performed TK in the 10 to 20 tonne region with equal ease:

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11111/111118734/3256868-1128722104-21914.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11111/111118734/3256869-4676390875-21914.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11111/111118734/3256870-3353340913-21914.jpg

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11111/111118734/3256890-5487750248-30948.jpg

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11111/111118734/3256933-3801642141-32563.jpg

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11111/111118734/3256934-3444873428-21391.jpg

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/9/93477/3362785-8696695627-33626.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/9/93477/3362786-8336924769-33626.jpg


Vader is undoubtedly impressive Force-user. However, do you think that only he is capable of pulling off feats of this caliber?

Aryn Leener, at one point, hurled six cars of a tram like missiles towards her opponents in a battle. I hope you understand what a Tram is.

Revan can do even better.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
He also finds your lack of faith disturbing, very disturbing.

He and I have disagreements on few matters actually.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD

Key term is "unusually."

Places such as Dark Temple and Dark Force Temple are "unusually" strong in the dark side, therefore both are officially recognized as a nexus of dark side energy. These places are surging with dark side energy to such an extent that they can have an impact on living beings visiting them.

1. Some planets have harsh environmental conditions and dangerous fauna; Tatooine is an example. These conditions do not imply nexus.

2. I acknowledge that Dromund Kaas have been strong in the dark side on the whole due to presence of Sith. However, this does not implies nexus situation.

3. Yes, Sith Emperor is responsible for influencing the environment of (entire) Dromund Kaas; this planet became 'strong' in the dark side due to Emperor's dark side practices. He is also responsible for creating nexus(es) of dark side energies in some regions of this planet; Dark Temple is an example.

Look, it is important to understand what constitutes as a nexus. Nexus(es) are mostly officially defined. Fan-led speculation can be wrong.

Inconsistencies are an unfortunate aspect of Star Wars mythos since multiple authors contribute to it and they sometimes are not careful at linking different stories. Inconsistencies aside, SWTOR is actually based on KoTOR II.

As far as capabilities of characters are concerned, you make it sound like as if Darth Traya is canonically stronger then Darth Nyriss; this isn't the case. Admittedly not much is known about Darth Nyriss at the moment but she wasn't a rookie, she was heavily involved in dark side practices and acquired a position in the Dark Council which is not an easy accomplishment for Sith in general.

I really don't get the supposed disadvantageous position of Meetra Surik in Dromund Kaas either. She have canonically demonstrated the capability to cope well with environments strong in the dark side as apparent from her actions in Korriban, Malachor V and Dromund Kaas.

Keep in mind that Meetra Surik was a 'wound in the Force' during the events of Sith Triumvirate, she benefitted from this condition during her confrontations with Darth Nihilus and Darth Traya; she wouldn't have survived in these confrontations otherwise. She is undoubtedly a powerful Jedi as apparent from her numerous performances but she isn't entitled to be equal of Revan, I don't think Mr. Avellone ever stated this.

My points are most often valid, if not always. It's not unusual or unheard of Emperor's inferior to collapse structures including whole buildings.

Darth Malgus once encountered a Jedi who collapsed [B]two buildings around the Sith Lord's position in an attempt to crush Sith Lord beneath the heavy rubble.

Honest question: If the referred Jedi can collapse buildings with his powers, why cannot Emperor who is confirmed to be the most powerful Force-user in the galaxy?

My point about Emperor's potential to collapse structures (including buildings) with his powers is absolutely valid. His apprentice collapsed large structures during her battle against Darth Thanaton.

Noted, will do.

And I hope that you will give importance to my valid points.

Statements such as these carried weightage when Mr. Lucas owned Star Wars, no more.

Erm, what?

Revan's performance against Emperor Vitiate is very impressive actually. Keep in mind that Emperor Vitiate is so powerful that he have been touted as a godlike being and have easily subdued Strike Teams of 'powerful' Force-users; at one point, he defeated a Strike Team of 12 Sith Lords. Emperor Vitiate would have defeated the trio of Revan, Meetra and Scourge as well.

Emperor Vitiate have fought and literally pwned hundreds of opponents in history and performance of Revan's caliber is a rare occurrence against him.

Half a tonne?

Mass of Asteroid 1 = 384,822.9 kg

Mass of Asteroid 2 = 527,153.4 kg

Mass of Asteroid 3 = 370,415.7 kg

OP didn't calculate mass of other asteroids but they are within the aforementioned range as well.

FACT: 1 ton = 1000 kg

Do the math.

Vader is undoubtedly impressive Force-user. However, do you think that only he is capable of pulling off feats of this caliber?

Aryn Leener, at one point, hurled six cars of a tram like missiles towards her opponents in a battle. I hope you understand what a Tram is.

Revan can do even better.

He and I have disagreements on few matters actually. [/B]

1. Unusual: Not usual, common, or ordinary.

An ordinary planet is for example, Tatooine, not strong in the Force at all. Dromund Kaas is shrouded in the dark side and therefore not like Tatooine or any normal planet, it is therefore unusual.

It is a dark side nexus, and strong enough to impact those in proximity to it. Because the Force is more heavily saturated that it would be elsewhere, in such conditions the dark side would be stronger and the light side would be weaker. These are well established facts.[list=1]
[*]Its a cumulative argument Legend.

[*]Strong in the DS = Nexus. Accept it already.

[*]Fan-led speculation? Your the one rejecting the fact that a Force Nexus is a place strong in the dark side. Which is exactly what it is.[/list=1] But fine, if you don't want to call it a dark side, don't. But its strong in the dark side, and that is a precedence enough to state it will effect Force Users.

2. You're telling me. But what inconsistencies in a continual universe demand are solutions, I am providing solutions here.

Anyway it is my opinion that Traya is stronger than Nyriss, but I won't push that, what I will push is that she is a master of the dark side and everything Nyriss has displayed she is capable of and then some, this at the very least suggests they are of similar ability and yet the Revan novel blatantly suggests otherwise. I don't think Nyriss is a rookiee. But you don't have to be a rookiee to be surpassed by a Sith Lord of Traya's caliber, just pointing that out.

Add that to the host of disadvantages Surik faced on Malachor that were absent on Kaas and the Exile's performance verges on the ridiculous.

And you know full well (or at least you should) that we propose the Exile was able to survive the effects of Malachor V with less difficulty that Dromund Kaas because she was a wound in the Force, which should theoretically protect her from its harmful effects, a wound being a barrier of sorts that the Force, obviously, cannot intrude in. It is strongly indicated that this wound closed after the events, or at the end of KOTOR II.

Unfortunately no sources state or suggest the Exile lost her power after the wound closed. I can only assume she retained the energies she had absorbed. Or it otherwise inadvertently expanded her capacity to wield the Force, it is after all comparable mechanically to the Nathema ritual performed by the Sith Emperor.

3. The Citadel =/= Two buildings.

4. I will, I will also dismiss any invalid arguments I come across.

5. Oh please. Says who? His hate-base? Layer it on with the Sith Emperor all you like, but that merely works against Revan, Vader rivaled a power than Revan couldn't hope to stand against. Debate closed I think.

6. My apologies, I mean asteroid. But lets follow that thought, in order to rival Vader's power he would have had to launch at least 40 asteroids. The poster only managed to count 22, and he was clearly very thorough. Taking into account that game mechanics are prone to exaggeration.

Do the math yourself my friend.

And you just convinced me, if Aryn Leener, a Jedi Knight surpassed by Malgus in Force Power is able to accomplish that feat, Vader can do what Revan did in a heartbeat.

And yes I'm sure Vader doesn't like Revan fanboys either.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
When the script demands:

😄

Originally posted by Beniboybling
1. Unusual: Not usual, common, or ordinary.

An ordinary planet is for example, Tatooine, not strong in the Force at all. Dromund Kaas is shrouded in the dark side and therefore not like Tatooine or any normal planet, it is therefore unusual.

It is a dark side nexus, and strong enough to impact those in proximity to it. Because the Force is more heavily saturated that it would be elsewhere, in such conditions the dark side would be stronger and the light side would be weaker. These are well established facts.[list=1]
[*]Its a cumulative argument Legend.

[*]Strong in the DS = Nexus. Accept it already.

[*]Fan-led speculation? Your the one rejecting the fact that a Force Nexus is a place strong in the dark side. Which is exactly what it is.[/list=1] But fine, if you don't want to call it a dark side, don't. But its strong in the dark side, and that is a precedence enough to state it will effect Force Users.


I am being cautious, sticking to official disclosures.

This question always comes in mind: Why BioWare had to explicitly assert that Dark Temple became a nexus of dark side energy? If the entire planet (Dromund Kaas) represents a nexus of dark side energy, such a declaration makes no sense.

My understanding is that nexus represents an extraordinarily strong concentration of energy (light or dark), so strong that it can leave an impact on living beings exposed to it. This wasn't the situation in entire Dromund Kaas.

My reservations are not unfounded, I have noticed that some people seem to get wrong ideas from nexus label.

Spoiler:
This comment isn't directed towards you.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
2. You're telling me. But what inconsistencies in a continual universe demand are solutions, I am providing solutions here.

I tend to connect the dots too, I prefer consistency as well. 🙂

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Anyway it is my opinion that Traya is stronger than Nyriss, but I won't push that, what I will push is that she is a master of the dark side and everything Nyriss has displayed she is capable of and then some, this at the very least suggests they are of similar ability and yet the Revan novel blatantly suggests otherwise. I don't think Nyriss is a rookiee. But you don't have to be a rookiee to be surpassed by a Sith Lord of Traya's caliber, just pointing that out.

I am willing to entertain the notion that Darth Traya and Darth Nyiss are possibly equals. However, Darth Nyriss seems to be superior combatant. This isn't surprising since Darth Traya is more scholarly-oriented.

Star Wars: The Old Republic: Revan doesn't discredits Surik's earlier performances and capabilities of Sith Triumvirate, it just affirms that Sith of reconstituted ancient Sith Empire are not a joke either.

In-fact, Mr. Avellone envisioned True Sith as incredibly powerful Force-users, he envisioned them like Celestials (no, I am not joking). BioWare have been very moderate in depicting the power of its characters in general. I hope that this situation would change under Disney.

Revan's hype isn't the result of demonstration of (super)powers or such, its the consistency in his performance. People noticed a warrior who struck down hundreds of opponents in his way, cut a swath through formidable defenses of Star Forge and legions of Sith stationed inside Star Forge, and triumphed over powerful Force-users such as Bastilla Shan and Darth Malak irrespective of them being augmented by the power of Star Forge itself, in a single prolonged attempt.

Notice the bold part? This is the primary reason. Not even Jedi Master Yoda have demonstrated matching level of performance in a single battle (or) people felt like this back then during 2003 after playing KoTOR I. Master Yoda's hype isn't the result of demonstration of (super)powers either, it is the result of accolades that he received in official literature.

Star Wars: The Old Republic: Revan simply affirms that Revan is stronger then most powerful members of Sith Triumvirate, Meetra Surik and even some Dark Council members. Some people have trouble digesting this ground reality but they need to broaden their mindset and move on.

I acknowledge that the aforementioned novel is poorly written, but is not poorly written for just one character, it is shitty on the whole. I simply assume that Darth Nyriss, Meetra Surik, Revan and Emperor Vitiate are capable of much more then what have been revealed in the aforementioned novel; most logical assessment, IMO.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Add that to the host of disadvantages Surik faced on Malachor that were absent on Kaas and the Exile's performance verges on the ridiculous.

And you know full well (or at least you should) that we propose the Exile was able to survive the effects of Malachor V with less difficulty that Dromund Kaas because she was a wound in the Force, which should theoretically protect her from its harmful effects, a wound being a barrier of sorts that the Force, obviously, cannot intrude in. It is strongly indicated that this wound closed after the events, or at the end of KOTOR II.


My assessment is that Surik's performance against Sith Triumvirate is more of a product of circumstances then she being a juggernaut of destruction. She was a "wound in the Force" during the events of Sith Triumvirate and this benefitted her during her encounters with most dangerous members of Sith Triumvirate, and this could also be a reason for she being able to cope well with the environment of Malachor V. Star Wars: The Old Republic: Revan implies that Meetra Surik is possibly a master swordsman so such a skill coupled with her "wound in the Force" condition became recipe for success against Sith Triumvirate for her. Makes sense to me.

After the events of Sith Triumvirate, Surik fully healed and became normal; she did retain her experience and command of the Force. She was a powerful Jedi but Jedi Masters of her time did not regarded her as being on par with Revan, in-fact one labeled her as being average. I don't fault the author of the aforementioned novel for not regarding her as being on par with Revan, his position makes more sense then raging fanboys of the character (no excusing the author's shitty writing though).

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Unfortunately no sources state or suggest the Exile lost her power after the wound closed. I can only assume she retained the energies she had absorbed. Or it otherwise inadvertently expanded her capacity to wield the Force, it is after all comparable mechanically to the Nathema ritual performed by the Sith Emperor.

When Surik regained her natural connection with the Force, she was back to her original potential as a Force-user. The unnatural benefits afforded by the wound condition vanished along with it.

Also, I don't get the comparison between benefits obtained by Surik from her wound in the Force condition and power progression of Emperor Vitiate from Nathema ritual. Am I missing something?

Originally posted by Beniboybling
3. The Citadel =/= Two buildings.

You are right; Citadel is one building.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
5. Oh please. Says who? His hate-base? Layer it on with the Sith Emperor all you like, but that merely works against Revan, Vader rivaled a power than Revan couldn't hope to stand against. Debate closed I think.

How exactly is Revan's lack of success against Emperor Vitiate a mark against him in comparison to Vader? You think that Vader would have defeated Emperor Vitiate?

Yes, under right circumstances, Vader could kill Sidious. This is obvious from his actions in the second Death Star. However, Vader stood no chance against Sidious in a fair scenario.

This debate is far from over, Beni.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
6. My apologies, I mean asteroid. But lets follow that thought, in order to rival Vader's power he would have had to launch at least 40 asteroids. The poster only managed to count 22, and he was clearly very thorough. Taking into account that game mechanics are prone to exaggeration.

Do the math yourself my friend.


What?

My point is that each of those asteroids that Revan pulled down on the platform are considerably heavier then any object Vader have lifted or moved with the Force during his life. Pay attention to the calculated figures, unless I am reading something wrong.

For example: 300,000 kg = 300 tons.

Revan pulled such heavy objects down towards the platform with tremendous force, gravity may have played some role in the falling aspect of these objects but Revan overcame the station's ability to prevent asteroids from falling in it with his sheer raw power. Quantity of asteroids (pulled down) isn't an indication of Revan's limitation, it is an indication of his circumstances during that battle. Keep in mind that he was under attack from an Imperial Strike Team while performing this feat.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
And you just convinced me, if Aryn Leener, a Jedi Knight surpassed by Malgus in Force Power is able to accomplish that
feat, Vader can do what Revan did in a heartbeat.

Ranks do not imply greater strength among Jedi. A Jedi Knight can be much stronger then a Jedi Master.

Leener's feat indicates that Vader's actions aren't grand or indication of his superiority over Revan. Leener's feat indicates that she is possibly a match for Vader and Revan is possibly better then Vader in the context of raw power.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
And yes I'm sure Vader doesn't like Revan fanboys either.

Doesn't matters since I am at a safe distance. 😛

LeGenD is kicking Beniboyblings ass.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
LeGenD is kicking Beniboyblings ass.

Protip: your trolling here would be more effective if that were actually within the realm of possibility.

Resume.

Ant is the future of trolling as we know it, while I'm the future of master- baiting.

Spoiler:
His future hasn't panned out, so far