Originally posted by Nephthys
That remains to be seen.
Does it? As it is you that wants to suggest that Vitiate deviates from his own race standards in a very special way, it would be your task to back that assertion with proof. Unless you can do that, there is no reason to follow your line of thinking, is there?
Dude, he's.... wearing a mask. You can't tell if he's a Voss Mystic or not. 😬
Totally didn't remember that - and I just went by the picture above. Has been ages since I played the HoT storyline.
But you're probably correct that he only possessed a Mystic after his confrontation with the Strike Team. We do know he was trapped on Voss before the Sith Warrior was chosen as the Wrath though. Which still puts the timeline at more or equal time as he would have been in possession of the body the Knight fights, if it were a Voice.
Actually, I was wrong there, I think.
Baras needed some time for research and planning to orchestrate his plan to trap the Voice. Also, if I remember correctly, the Voss mystic that would become the Voice was kidnapped from the planet shortly after its discovery [years before the events of SW:TOR]. I could be wrong there, of course. Would need some research on Baras' plans, I think. That could also explain why Vitiate was wearing a mask during his confrontation with the Jedi Strike Team. Revealing the Voss identity of his Voice would probably have led to investigations on the planet - and have weakened the Empire's presence there.
I was showing off the pale skin color. Though the Vitiate we see in the Dark Temple has far paler skin than any human with darkside corruption too.
That appears to be speculation, Neph.
Yet we know that Vitiate barely resembles his species from Karpyshan's twitter.
Again, Neph: Everything said outside official source material can be considered non-existant as far as evidence goes for debates here. You may want to recall Nick Gillard's statement that lightsaber forms (specifically Vaapad) didn't even exists. The authority of a Star Wars authors doesn't extend beyond the source material and even then, if he left something open for interpretation it is just that: open for interpretation.
Did you seriously not know that Vitiate is wearing a mask in that scene? Speaking of which, lets take a look at it, shall we:There's no facial appendages here. No bumps in the fabric other than for his ears.
Non conclusive evidence, Neph. There is also no bump from a nose, so I suppose Vitiate is Lord Voldemort. Depending on the fit of the Mask, they could be hidden under it. If that even is his real body, which would be another deviation from his modus operandi of keeping Voices in the first place.
Perhaps channeling that much darkside energy and death permanently or temporarily corrupted him enough to turn his eyes red.
His eyes were entirely black, Neph. While I can see the Iris turning red, I don't see how his sclera (the white stuff in a human eye) would go from black to white in the process.
Do you have any actual proof that its the case that all Ancient Sith had facial appendages and its solely because of inbreeding that we see Sith Pureblood without them in TOR? Because pictures of the Ancient Sith show otherwise:Naga Sadow actually has been drawn without facial appendages at times btw. And there did seem to be Sith without facial appendages in the old TotJ comics:
Though the monkey faces are quite amusing.
Also you forget that Ffon didn't have facial appendages either.
You may want to check the typical features of the Sith species here (since I'm lacking any other source at the moment). Anything that deviates from those was caused by interbreeding with the human Dark Jedi. Which can be completely ruled out for the maternal side of Vitiate's family (non force-sensitive completely) and is rather unlikely, considering the Human Dark Jedi where dwelling mostly on the main planets of the Empire (Ziost).
For the rest of your examples: There are still some remarkable features that destinquish the Sith rather clearly from human beings - and most of that are protuding bone spurs, which also wouldn't disappear through Dark Side corruption.
No, I don't see why that would change anything or why Vitiate would be so heavily weakened after one death as opposed to the other.
Because it wasn't the death that weakened him, but the failed ritual he attempted. He was already in a weakend condition when the HoT confronted him - otherwise the Jedi wouldn't have survived the encounter.
How do you know? Vitiate is a completely unique case. We have no idea how he changed over the centuries.
Because we haven't seen body parts falling off because of Dark Side corruption? Please stop speculating without the slightest bit of evidence pointing in the direction of your thoughts.
Says the guy going on about midi-chlorian limits. If that's the case then it shouldn't matter if it was the Voice or not. If his essence is what determines his power, then the Voice which contains his essence is just as powerful as his true body.
Do you think that Vitiate's original body has a higher midi-chlorian count than any of his Voice bodies, Neph, given his prodigal talent in the force? That appears to be likely. So it does matter which body he was using - you just didn't get the point.
Oh please, Vitiate has already had one Wrath turn on him. What do you think would happen if his new Wrath, barely appointed and largely untested in terms of loyalty, were to learn that his true body had been vanquished? Hell, if he wanted to the Wrath could rather simply take up where Baras left off. Kill the Hand, **** up Vitiate's return and tell everyone that he'll deliver the Emperor's orders from now on. Telling him that it was just his Voice would lead to much the same reaction as you're having, that he'd obviously return and it's nothing that significant.
The detail you have missed, dear Neph, is the message send by servant one before Vitiate's confrontation with the HoT:
"We are again aware of the Voice. Preparations are being made to secure a new host, but the rituals take time." - Servant One
Do you think they saw what would happen to Vitiate before, and so lied to the Wrath about securing a new host body, while letting Vitiate run lose in his original body?
He say's "The Emperor's body", not "The Voice's body". All sources refer to the being in the temple as "The Sith Emperor" and that the Jedi Knight struck down "The Emperor." When the Sith Warrior talks with the Voice, all game text refers to him as "The Emperor's Voice." Even when Kira Carsen is possessed by him, it refers to him as "Kira Carsen" still. Yet all sources including the Lead Writer refers to it as "The Emperor's body".
Except the two messages from Servant One, with the first one claiming that they are finding a new host body for the Emperor after the Wrath killed the Voss body?
That aside, Neph: You're stretching it with your claims. The thing facing the Jedi Strike Team is also exclusively reffered to as "the Emperor" and not "his Voice". When the Voice is trapped on Voss, the terms are used interchangeably throughout the source material, because trapping the Voice trapped the Emperor as well. And if the Voice wields Vitiate's power, why destinquish Emperor and Voice on all occassions?
Also lol @ wanting to discard the opinion of the Lead Writer for Swtor but taking the Hand totally at their word.
I'm not discarding the opinion of the Lead Write but your interpretation of it, when pretty much everything suggests that you are wrong.