Originally posted by dadudemon
Actually, Hulk's transformation is theorized to be magical and no one knows where the additional mass comes from. It resembles, strongly, the same transformation that the avatar of Cyttorak undergoes.
In the movies its not. Movies have used everything from nanotechnology to biological mutation to explain his power. Comic books have never hinted at his condition being magical in nature. You wouldn't know about it anyways, since you probably got that crap from wikipedia instead of reading comics. Or you know, the easier way out in the form of the
Hulk Respect thread.
Cyttorak doesn't exist in the movies either.😂
Originally posted by dadudemon
You could not have used a worse example to prove your point: that proved my point, good sir.
😕
Originally posted by dadudemon
Check out the actual definitions. Magic is the best answer.
No it's not. Sci-fi is the best answer. Even magic portrayed in fiction often times has specific limits and rules attributed to its capabilities.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You can whine and protest all you want: it's functionally magic.
Every superpower portrayed in fiction if "functionally magic". Since you obviously agree with that assessment, that would mean that Manhattan's "magical"-ness isn't unique to him(as you have repeatedly implied in your previous posts). What exactly is the point behind this stupid argument then?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Let me make it more clear for you: no humans will EVER be able to change the four fundamental forces of physics UNLESS we become functionally indistinguishable from the commonly understood definition of "God."
WTF are talking about? Humans have designed devices which can have varying degrees of control over each of the 4 fundamental forces. And that's irl humans, not the ridiculously advanced tech which humans in fiction possess.
And what does this 4 fundamental forces bullshit have to do with magic or Manhattan? Manhattan was never mentioned as manipulating any of the 4 forces. His power is over Intrinsic fields, which is wholly different from something, say like gravity.
Originally posted by dadudemon
So you have no arguments that support your position?
That would be you.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Basically, you just conceded all of my points of contention.
And that confirms that you suffer from some form of schizophrenia.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Namely, the explosion wasn't an explosion and the power cosmic has no real definition from the films (meaning, it's ambiguous).
Except that is was shown as an explosion in the film, and Power Cosmic is a form of power which gives one control over matter and energy.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Thank you for proving my points. You don't realize that by answering my questions (which I already knew the answers to), you fell right into my trap and gave the EXACT answers I was looking for to destroy the last vestiges of your position. 🙂Holy shit, it's great to be king. 😆 I'm so amazing I even impress myself, sometimes. 🙂
😂😂😂 The red-faced humiliation is literally seeping through your post and out of my screen.
Never change, ddm.