Galactus vs Thanos with Cosmic Cube

Started by Galan0075 pages

Originally posted by cdtm
? Special case?

Isn't Beyonder established as below Cube beings after the Secret Wars is retconned?

While the original intent of the first retcon in F4 #319 was to have Beyonder and Owen as sub-Cube being-level, the events of F4 Annual #27 threw that out the window completely.

...A retcon within a retcon, essentially. 👆

Originally posted by Galan007
^ While that was definitely the intent of the original retcon in F4 #319, the events of F4 Annual #27 pretty much retconned it away.

What about Molecule Man? Where does he stand compared to Cube beings and Beyonder?

I've seen the scans where MM forces Maker into Beyonder, then beats him in a fight... which cames across as a sort of a writer abusing his position to get his fanboy-ish beliefs out in print, but it happened..

^ Yeah, that's the battle I'm referencing(from F4 Annual #27) which retcons the notion that Beyonder/Owen were sub-Cube being-level.

The battle between Owen/Beyonder was trans-multiversal in scale:

Sub-Cube beings simply do not possess power remotely close to that magnitude.

Heh, going by that, Beyonder didn't evolve when he became Maker, he took a major downgrade. 😂

Yeah, Beyonder's got more retcons/ups-and-downs than any other character I know of--writers simply don't know what to do with him, me thinks.

Hell, his powers seemed to be back to their 'classic' levels during Spider-Man and the Secret Wars(2010):
http://i.imgur.com/9WjapCd.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/sChuP6d.jpg

So who knows..? srug

Originally posted by cdtm
? Special case?

Isn't Beyonder established as below Cube beings after the Secret Wars is retconned?


Galan pretty much covered the bases but one more thing I may add.

As far as Beyonder is concerned he's like a Cube being anomaly.

The only logical reasons I find why Beyonder is more powerful than Kubik or Cube beings:

Unlike other Cube beings who were developed properly (within the
confinement of a Cosmic Containment Unit) which also forces them
to self impose limitations upon reaching sentience (making Cube
beings universal at best we've seen) ...
the Beyonder was conceived by accident, and Not withIN a CCU.

Beyonder's essence/energy/power (which like all other Cube beings
necessitates a CCU to be nurtured correctly into maturity) instead
slipped out of the Beyond Realm and ended up exploding into a
universe occupying it's own space somewhere within the omniverse.
This also allowed Beyonder to develop free of restraints,
thus you have a Cube being (Beyonder) performing feats that
should belong to fully harnessed Cosmic Containment Units.

By the time Beyonder entered a CCU with Owen, it was just to become whole,
he had already developed a consciousness/essence of his own.
This is why Kosmos is almost like another being apart from Beyonder even though it's an incarnation of his. (sharing memories and all)
Thanos called it a prison for Beyonder's "unlimited power." (which Beyonder self-imposed)

Come to think of it, perhaps that was the the CCU in him acting out after entering the CCU with Owen,
perhaps this is why he transformed himself into Kosmos.
(basically a watered down version of himself akin to Cube beings limiting themselves upon sentience)

My, my, that makes sense.

Thanks, Mr. M.

One other question:

Originally posted by Mr Master
^^ I forgot about that one actually. 👆 One could argue its canonicity though.

How so?

And that reference takes me back.. It wasn't a very good game, but by licensed standards it was actually pretty playable...

Originally posted by Mr Master
It was. 🙁 ... Also, the CCU defeated Galactus' power and then some, and it had nothing to do with hunger.

Galactus was hungry when it did so.🙂

We know that hungry Galactus is dramatically weaker than a recently fed Galactus. That much is indisputable fact, not up for debate.

Originally posted by cdtm
How so?

And that reference takes me back.. It wasn't a very good game, but by licensed standards it was actually pretty playable...

He/they were referring to the happenings of "Iron Man/X-O Manowar: In Heavy Metal", wherein a CCU was responsible for not only collapsing multiple omniversal planes of existence, but also restoring said planes...

"The multiverseS topple over like dominoes--one omniversal plane implodes into nothingness--and the next--and the next--until the only thing left of reality--is nothing."
http://i.imgur.com/KaLRjPI.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/zuVGeyp.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/iL6C7eC.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/F4AZ3y1.jpg

The Cube would later be used by Iron Man and X-O to restore the aforementioned:
http://i.imgur.com/1VTHUys.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/yuY6eP0.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/oZCwpIZ.jpg

Absolutely gargantuan display of power for the Cube--it's best showing in any medium, without a doubt. However, like Mr M said: it happened in a crossover, thus its canonicity is... Disputable, at best. In fact, it was released primarily as a promo-book for a video game of the same name(Acclaim owned the rights at the time.)

^ 👆

Originally posted by Epicurus

Galactus was hungry when it did so.


Well, an amped "hungry" Galactus empowered Doom to be exact.
Originally posted by Epicurus

We know that hungry Galactus is dramatically weaker than a recently fed Galactus. That much is indisputable fact, not up for debate.


I agree.

Although, the first post of mine you replied to has nothing to do with Galactus' hunger.

Reed gestured, and Galactus was re-created anew. (this happened after Doom was stomped)

Uatu also stated that the CCU was beyond Galactus. (after Reed re-created G)

I remember a Marvunapp bio saying that that particular crossover involved Earth-616.

Originally posted by Mr Master

So, where exactly is it that I deny something?

I requested scans, scans were posted and what? What?
I gave a thumbs up, and continued on my main course, the only avenue I followed the entire time from the very beginning:

You proved it was constricted to 616, (I didn't know that) but it wasn't the crux of my point.

You didn't know what was constricted to 616?

Yes, you gave a thumbs up, but you still denied it (not in that post, but the previous one; and in the previous one i still posted that bio which should have settled it).

Anyway, let's just settle this here: Based on the evidence posted, do you agree that the cube's full potential was universal only, back then? If yes (and you should agree, because the evidence speaks for itself), then the argument is finished. And nothing more should be said.

Originally posted by cdtm
What about Molecule Man? Where does he stand compared to Cube beings and Beyonder?

Just something to add:

At first, Owen/Beyonder were below Kubik (despite the fact that their Secret Wars 2 feats were still canon) since Kubik defeated the Beyonder; he even said that his power dwarfs his as i recall. Then when they evolved (after they merged), they apparently got more powerful. And Owen was made > Beyonder (when they were half-cubes, Beyonder was > Owen, this was evident since in SW 2, Beyonder defeated him and since the retcon says that Owen merely had a "small" portion of the cube's energies, while Beyonder had most of it).
In regards to Owen's standing compared to other cube beings: It was confirmed in FF annual #27 (same issue where their trans multiversal fight happened, which Galan posted) that Molecule Man's potential power dwarfs Kubik's:

http://i.imgur.com/Mf8rV1q.jpg?1

btw, Kubik was implied to be multiversal in Avengers #290.

Originally posted by operator616

I remember a Marvunapp bio saying that that particular crossover involved Earth-616.


Awesome. I'd like to see that so I can use it as future reference.
Originally posted by operator616

You didn't know what was constricted to 616?


Thanos' CCU.
Originally posted by operator616

Yes, you gave a thumbs up, but you still denied it
(not in that post, but the previous one; and in the previous one i still posted that bio which should have settled it).


Uhm, perhaps you're misunderstanding my posts, maybe I confused you the way I worded it, but ...

1) I didn't deny jack! So, again you're still talking fantasies.

2) Actually, your bio would have never settled anything. Since on panel > bios.
It was the on panel statements I accepted first, (posted by Galan first) then the bio as a corroboration.

What I did disagree with, was your stance on Thanos going all out to impress Death.
I stated, "he shouldn't have allowed himself to be defeated" if he was on an impression campaign, even if initially that was his aim.

So, pay attention friend before you erroneously yet again, accuse me fallaciously.

Originally posted by operator616

Anyway, let's just settle this here: Based on the evidence posted, do you agree that the cube's full potential was universal only, back then? If yes (and you should agree, because the evidence speaks for itself), then the argument is finished. And nothing more should be said.


The discussion ended for me on the previous page, it's you who's rehashing this.

I already agreed that Thanos became the universe and it was solely constricted to 616.

Again below: (bottom of page 3)

Originally posted by Mr Master

You proved it was constricted to 616, (I didn't know that) but it wasn't the crux of my point.

What more do you want?

It still doesn't change the fact that he was God.
That means to me, whatever you're capable of outside 616 is nice, but if you step into 616 you get stomped.

Originally posted by operator616

btw, Kubik was implied to be multiversal in Avengers #290.


I don't think it was implied that Kubik by his lonesome was potentially multiversal.
I believe you're referring to Kubik's theory based on two Cube being powers confronting.

I'd have to guess the concept of "Synergy" comes into play here.

^ Yeah, ive heard that before.

Originally posted by Mr Master
Awesome. I'd like to see that so I can use it as future reference.

I already showed it to you in the Phoenix vs Odin (iirc) thread to prove that a scan i provided from that comic is canon, which you were denying.

Anyway, here's the Marvunapp page:

http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix3/earthcrossoverall.htm

go to the "what is earth crossover and why aren't all crossovers with other companies included" part, and you'll find this:

X-O Manowar/Iron Man (involved Earth-616 and Earth-Valiant merging)
Originally posted by Mr Master
maybe I confused you the way I worded it

You confused me by continually saying that Thanos is God, which is why whether he is universal or multiversal is irrelevant or something like that.

I took that as you denying that Thanos was merely universal.

Anyway, since we agree that the CCU was only universal back then, nothing needs to be said anymore.

Originally posted by operator616

^ Yeah, ive heard that before.


Cool, and it makes perfect sense too.
Originally posted by operator616

I already showed it to you in the Phoenix vs Odin (iirc) thread to prove that a scan i provided from that comic is canon,

which you were denying.


Good lord, you can't post without adding a little shitty remark?

You need to smoke some good shit son and get happy.

Originally posted by operator616

Anyway, here's the Marvunapp page:
http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix3/earthcrossoverall.htm
go to the "what is earth crossover and why aren't all crossovers with other companies included" part, and you'll find this:


Thank you, I'll read it.

Also, that's all you needed to post, there was no need for the irrelevant recall.
You should remind yourself of the several times I admitted I was wrong and you were right about a detail.
Of course, when the shoe is on your foot, you simply slip away without conceding.
I have several saved links to threads where this has occurred, let me know.

I mean, since your gonna continue to spit on my name by making me synonymous with obtuseness.
Yea, like bringing up this "denying" horse shit concerning another thread, which is a WTF here.
Which is funny cause it's something that I'm known for hating.
I regularly use the term: Intransigence, to address such behavior. (meaning, dismissing/not accepting On Panel evidence)

Originally posted by operator616

You confused me by continually saying that Thanos is God, which is why whether he is universal or multiversal is irrelevant or something like that.
I took that as you denying that Thanos was merely universal.
Anyway, since we agree that the CCU was only universal back then, nothing needs to be said anymore.


I never said it was anything else. My contention was always that he was God, so who cares.
At first, since I hadn't read the story in a while I was unaware it was made clear that the Cube's influence was universal,
but after proof was provided, I was done. The debate then turned nasty and meaningless.

And if you return with more personal attacks, I'll swim in the mud with ya till the end.

I'd just like to add:

Celestial Muzzle ftw.

That is all.

Originally posted by Mr Master

Good lord, you can't post without adding a little shitty remark?

You need to smoke some good shit son and get happy.

Thank you, I'll read it.

Also, that's all you needed to post, there was no need for the irrelevant recall.
You should remind yourself of the several times I admitted I was wrong and you were right about a detail.
Of course, when the shoe is on your foot, you simply slip away without conceding.
I have several saved links to threads where this has occurred, let me know.

I mean, since your gonna continue to spit on my name by making me synonymous with obtuseness.
Yea, like bringing up this "denying" horse shit concerning another thread, which is a WTF here.
Which is funny cause it's something that I'm known for hating.
I regularly use the term: Intransigence, to address such behavior. (meaning, dismissing/not accepting On Panel evidence)

I think you're misunderstanding my intention here. First off, in that particular debate, you weren't denying evidence; you were merely denying its canonicity because it's a crossover and you had every right to do so.

So again: you weren't denying its canonciity after i posted the Marvunapp page. Just before, and you have the right to do so.

So i was using the term "denial" in the sense that you weren't accepting it being canon based on it being a crossover and nothing more. I never meant to insult you, i merely added that detail to help you recall and to say that i posted it before.

Same thing with the "moot point" and "faulty logic" insults which you are accusing me of. They weren't meant to insult you. I assure you. It's just that you see insults/personal attacks every time i say something. When in fact, that's the last thing on my mind.

I have absolutely no reason to just randomly bash you or anyone else on this forum. That's not my style. I don't come here to fight or insult.

Im out. Have a good day.

Originally posted by Mr Master
Well, an amped "hungry" Galactus empowered Doom to be exact.

Based on what do you believe he was amped? That doesn't even make any sense honestly speaking.
Originally posted by Mr Master

I agree.

Although, the first post of mine you replied to has nothing to do with Galactus' hunger.

Reed gestured, and Galactus was re-created anew. (this happened after Doom was stomped)

Uatu also stated that the CCU was beyond Galactus. (after Reed re-created G)


It does, because he was hungry in that instance.

He restored Galactus back to normal after catching Doom off-guard. It's not recreation, as much as just undoing Doom's shenanigans via reality warping.

I don't give much credence to Uatu's claims. This is the same guy who has, despite the repeated monologue of being bound to an unbreakable vow of non-interference, broken his vow like a million times on-panel.

Originally posted by operator616

I think you're misunderstanding my intention here. First off, in that particular debate, you weren't denying evidence; you were merely denying its canonicity because it's a crossover and you had every right to do so.

So again: you weren't denying its canonciity after i posted the Marvunapp page. Just before, and you have the right to do so.

So i was using the term "denial" in the sense that you weren't accepting it being canon based on it being a crossover and nothing more. I never meant to insult you, i merely added that detail to help you recall and to say that i posted it before.


You see, now this is beautiful. 🙂 One pointer though, "deny/denial" is not a good term to exercise to convey what you're saying now.

You should use the term: ... "Skeptical" instead. (as in, 'you were skeptical'😉

"Deny" is like refusing to believe something that is/proven true, which = to a hard headed one track mind. (intransigence)

Originally posted by operator616

Same thing with the "moot point" and "faulty logic" insults which you are accusing me of. They weren't meant to insult you. I assure you. It's just that you see insults/personal attacks every time i say something. When in fact, that's the last thing on my mind.

I have absolutely no reason to just randomly bash you or anyone else on this forum. That's not my style. I don't come here to fight or insult.

Im out. Have a good day.


👆 ... When I think someone is wrong about something, I simply post what I believe to be the facts,
and leave out my personal feelings about the person's post. (no matter how ridiculous it may be)

But I also do snap back when I feel someone is trying to taint my name.
I love this place and I'm not having it when I built my bones through years of participation.

Although that's neither here nor there now.

Anyway, I do appreciate this/your post, we can now go back to: friends

Originally posted by Epicurus

Based on what do you believe he was amped? That doesn't even make any sense honestly speaking.


The Ultimate Machine, the Sacred Helix of Randac & the Cosmic Control Rod.

Regardless of the power of this amp, it's an amp.

Originally posted by Epicurus

It does, because he was hungry in that instance.

He restored Galactus back to normal after catching Doom off-guard. It's not recreation, as much as just undoing Doom's shenanigans via reality warping.


He re-created Galactus anew, who wasn't portrayed as being hungry anymore.
Odin was part of the party, so, he got twisted likewise.

btw, When you warp reality, you re-order space-time-matter.

Originally posted by Epicurus

I don't give much credence to Uatu's claims. This is the same guy who has, despite the repeated monologue of being bound to an unbreakable vow of non-interference, broken his vow like a million times on-panel.


That's cool. But the writer had just made Reed remake Galactus, and tp'd all of Earth while choosing to allow G and Uatu to by pass the effects.

I think his statement was justified imo.

Reed also stated that Doom would be master of the universe with just the CCU.

Originally posted by Mr Master
The Ultimate Machine, the Sacred Helix of Randac & the Cosmic Control Rod.

Regardless of the power of this amp, it's an amp.


Were used in conjunction to usurp Galactus' power.

No it's not. The CCU is the only thing which should provide a reasonable boost when added to Galactus' "hungry" power-level, but seeing how Doom discarded it immediately after acquiring what he wanted.....

Originally posted by Mr Master

He re-created Galactus anew, who wasn't portrayed as being hungry anymore.
Odin was part of the party, so, he got twisted likewise.

Again, based on what? For all we know, he decided to go off and seek another planet to satiate his hunger. Which, iirc he did.

Yeah, that's definitely a feat, but I doubt that in modern times a cosmic cube would have the juice to so gesturely manipulate Odin's form against his will.

Originally posted by Mr Master

btw, When you warp reality, you re-order space-time-matter.

That's cool. But the writer had just made Reed remake Galactus, and tp'd all of Earth while choosing to allow G and Uatu to by pass the effects.

I think his statement was justified imo.

Reed also stated that Doom would be master of the universe with just the CCU.


I know what reality warping means. As the Secret Wars retelling showed us, Galactus' mere presence causes unintended reality warps.

Yes, and I don't believe that said feat puts him above and beyond Galactus definitely. Franklin Richards' power has been used twice to revive Galactus now, and neither time did his powers get depleted or were lost(the Abraxas shit was retconned by Hickman). Yet nobody in their right mind would go about claiming that Franklin Richards is above Galactus. Except for maybe Id. And me. Since I am such a big Franklin Richards fanboy.😎

I respectfully disagree.

Then why did Doom go to all the trouble of acquiring Galactus' power in that arc? Heck, why bother with the other devices at all if the cube alone can get the job done? Imo, that arc was very inconsistent.