Khan Noonien Singh vs. Palpatine

Originally posted by quanchi112
He prevailed though. Palpatinr was under his mercy. Speculation. We see Thr lightning scar him and Palaptine later even mentions this before the senate. See I use movie evidence. I'm exceptional.

Lucas is no longer in charge. To be fair it's Disney's show now. 🙂

You have no evidence to support the claim. This sums up your debating. Bias and claims you can't prove. Lucas is out, kiddo.

First off the first paragraph you would make for a great senator in palpatines ring since you fall for his tricks just like them. He says the attempt on my life has left me scarred. This dude has deceived the senate since day 1. He was already messed up in his physical appearance. He used a SITH mask technique to hide his true face as it would be needed for his double life. You fell for his trick to. You are gullible.

ROTS was made before Disney bought it so really the original movies still his show. 🙂

I'm not trying to debate right now I'm trying to set the battle grounds as you and ancient power were fluctuating between the old and new versions. However there still is proof for both sides. I chose the Sidious threw the fight side. I'm not going to challenge anyone on their opinion for it that why I dont put forth any evidence right now so no one mistakes it. However I could. Not being biased just saying its proof for both. Also I'm not a kid. Just setting that out there.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
First off the first paragraph you would make for a great senator in palpatines ring since you fall for his tricks just like them. He says the attempt on my life has left me scarred. This dude has deceived the senate since day 1. He was already messed up in his physical appearance. He used a SITH mask technique to hide his true face as it would be needed for his double life. You fell for his trick to. You are gullible.

ROTS was made before Disney bought it so really the original movies still his show. 🙂

I'm not trying to debate right now I'm trying to set the battle grounds as you and ancient power were fluctuating between the old and new versions. However there still is proof for both sides. I chose the Sidious threw the fight side. I'm not going to challenge anyone on their opinion for it that why I dont put forth any evidence right now so no one mistakes it. However I could. Not being biased just saying its proof for both. Also I'm not a kid. Just setting that out there.

Disney decides what is canon now. The movie is. Show me any movie evidence to support your claims, nerd.

There is no proof he threw the fight. Support it with movie evidence.

Originally posted by quanchi112
His life was attempted to be taken. We see that. His face was scarred. We also see that. He keeps his true motives hidden but the events from his perspective were definitely true. Again I cited evidence you ignored it and made something up.

Disney decides what is canon now. The movie is. Show me any movie evidence to support your claims, nerd.

There is no proof he threw the fight. Support it with movie evidence.

No you dodged what I said. It's recognized that the face we saw for palaptine was a SITH mask technique. He used it for a double life. He had emerged himself in the dark side so far that dark side degradation took place and messed up his face. So windu didn't scar him he just disabled the mask. You took evidence from a lying palaptine. He told the senate that to turn them agaisn't the Jedi. You should be a senator.

ROTS was made in 2005. Disney a purchased lucasfilms in 2012. So the triology is Lucas work and what we see is what he gave us. It's hard to call me a nerd when we are all here debating about if two fictional character fought one another who would win.

Again I'm not trying to debate with you if you want to debate this PM me. There is evidence to at the very least suggest that Sidious threw the fight. PM me if you wish to debate this topic.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I already answered now you answer my question.

No you didn't, you just keep repeating that it's their opinion about what happened, I'm asking why should anyone care what their opinion is.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Proejcting. False. Khan would kill the old man.

No. Khan dies badly. Everyone knows it but you are just too stubborn to admit it.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
No you dodged what I said. It's recognized that the face we saw for palaptine was a SITH mask technique. He used it for a double life. He had emerged himself in the dark side so far that dark side degradation took place and messed up his face. So windu didn't scar him he just disabled the mask. You took evidence from a lying palaptine. He told the senate that to turn them agaisn't the Jedi. You should be a senator.

ROTS was made in 2005. Disney a purchased lucasfilms in 2012. So the triology is Lucas work and what we see is what he gave us. It's hard to call me a nerd when we are all here debating about if two fictional character fought one another who would win.

Again I'm not trying to debate with you if you want to debate this PM me. There is evidence to at the very least suggest that Sidious threw the fight. PM me if you wish to debate this topic.

Disney decides what is canon now. They can disregard anything they want. There isn't any evidence nor can you prove it. I do not like dishonest debaters who dismiss events and make stuff up based off nothing other than crackpot theories.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No you didn't, you just keep repeating that it's their opinion about what happened, I'm asking why should anyone care what their opinion is.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
No. Khan dies badly. Everyone knows it but you are just too stubborn to admit it.

I have given evidence to support khan attacks quicker and with greater power. I have seen nothing to dispute my evidence. Feel free to argue, boy.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Based on their experiences, expertise with extradordinary events. Do you disagree with their assessment ?

How does their "experiences or expertise with extraordinary events" in the Star Trek universe make their opinions on what constitutes impressive or superhuman feats better than our opinions, considering that we have 1,000's of times more exposure to feats to base our opinions on?

Originally posted by Silent Master
How does their "experiences or expertise with extraordinary events" in the Star Trek universe make their opinions on what constitutes impressive or superhuman feats better than our opinions, considering that we have 1,000's of times more exposure to feats to base our opinions on?

Again, no you haven't. Your argument boils down to you trust their opinion and that should be enough for everyone else.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, no you haven't. Your argument boils down to you trust their opinion and that should be enough for everyone else.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said that is evidence. I agree with them. Dont you ?

The mere act of you saying something doesn't make it true.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The mere act of you saying something doesn't make it true.

It's only their opinion on what people can do and you still haven't given a valid reason that we should place more weight on their opinion than our own, especially since we have 1,000s of times more exposure to feats to base our opinions on?

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's only their opinion on what people can do and you still haven't given a valid reason that we should place more weight on their opinion than our own, especially since we have 1,000s of times more exposure to feats to base our opinions on?

You agreeing with them isn't a valid reason.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You agreeing with them isn't a valid reason.

You have yet to give me the valid reason I asked for and now you're trying to change the subject in the hopes that people will forget that you've been completely unable answer my very simple question.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You have yet to give me the valid reason I asked for and now you're trying to change the subject in the hopes that people will forget that you've been completely unable answer my very simple question.