Khan Noonien Singh vs. Palpatine

Started by EmperorSidious293 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nah, you're an ignorant troll who hasn't seen the film.

Nah.

So you admit you were wrong. 😂

Concession accepted.

Yea.

I admit I made a mistake possibly.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Concession accepted.

Yea.

I admit I made a mistake possibly.

You conceded.

Nah.

You said you did. 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
You conceded.

Nah.

You said you did. 😂

Yes you did.

Yea.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Yes you did.

Yea.

You conceded not mr.

Nah.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You still don't know what combat speed is apparently.

I guess that's a 'no', then. So Khan loses on account of lacking speed feats.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You conceded not mr.

Nah.

Yes you did concede.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I've seen what breaking posters such as stealth ranger and darth Thor turns into.

Sure Quan. That's why you keep running from my Battlezone challenges where Objective judges would put an end to your Trolling on this topic once and for all.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I completely disagree.

I have not dismissed a single feat. I have rebutted every point or lack thereof in full detail.

In other words where we've provided clear evidence against you, you've having no evidential rebuttal to give in return have instead just talked outta your ass for hundreds of pages.

One more time.. This is how easily Sidious will deal with Khan:

?v=W9DZF7Hx2zM

End of.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Sure Quan. That's why you keep running from my Battlezone challenges where Objective judges would put an end to your Trolling on this topic once and for all.

I dunno, I battlezoned quan once. He lost, but he's still trolling as hard as ever. Do battlezones actually solve anything?

Originally posted by The Scenario
I dunno, I battlezoned quan once. He lost, but he's still trolling as hard as ever. Do battlezones actually solve anything?

You know, I don't imagine it would stop him trolling. Nothing would, the guy has no shame. But if he did battle zone me then every time he trolled here again on Khan vs Jedi/Sith I would never stop rubbing it in how he's already lost to me on topic.

What did you battlezone him on?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
You know, I don't imagine it would stop him trolling. Nothing would, the guy has no shame. But if he did battle zone me then every time he trolled here again on Khan vs Jedi/Sith I would never stop rubbing it in how he's already lost to me on topic.

What did you battlezone him on?

Russell Edgington (from True Blood) vs. Ganondorf (from Legend of Zelda)

Ganondorf dominated Russell, so quan lost hard, but he still seems to disagree. Plus, he's currently taking one of the judge's words out of context in order to claim that he outdebated me anyway. I guarantee his reply to me on this topic will be some variation of his being "10 percent superior" or similar.

So yeah, even if he does battlezone you, watch for him to weasel out of his loss any way he can.

Originally posted by The Scenario
I guess that's a 'no', then. So Khan loses on account of lacking speed feats.
Khan's guns are too powerful and too fast for the Jedi to block or evade.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Yes you did concede.
No, I did not.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Sure Quan. That's why you keep running from my Battlezone challenges where Objective judges would put an end to your Trolling on this topic once and for all.

In other words where we've provided clear evidence against you, you've having no evidential rebuttal to give in return have instead just talked outta your ass for hundreds of pages.

One more time.. This is how easily Sidious will deal with Khan:

?v=W9DZF7Hx2zM

End of.

I have more battlezones to my name than any other poster on the site.

You backed out of a battlezone you agreed to the day of. Unforgivable.

Khan guns him down. You had the chance to accept but proved yourself to be a faithless joke the day of. You didn't believe in Vader despite your posturing.

Originally posted by The Scenario
Russell Edgington (from True Blood) vs. Ganondorf (from Legend of Zelda)

Ganondorf dominated Russell, so quan lost hard, but he still seems to disagree. Plus, he's currently taking one of the judge's words out of context in order to claim that he outdebated me anyway. I guarantee his reply to me on this topic will be some variation of his being "10 percent superior" or similar.

So yeah, even if he does battlezone you, watch for him to weasel out of his loss any way he can.

False. Digi admitted I outdebated you as I did a far better job but he felt dorf was too powerful so you had an easier job. He definitely said I was the superior debater. You also offered an apology because you had no idea what I had in store for you. Don't lie or twist things.

Originally posted by quanchi112
False. Digi admitted I outdebated you as I did a far better job but he felt dorf was too powerful so you had an easier job. He definitely said I was the superior debater. You also offered an apology because you had no idea what I had in store for you. Don't lie or twist things.

Post the quote if you want anyone to believe you. Proof, quan. We both know he said nothing of the sort. What he actually said was that you represented more of Russell's abilities. He said nothing about who was the better debator.

Still, I'm glad we've finally established that Ganondorf was far more powerful than Russell.

Khan's guns are too powerful and too fast for the Jedi to block or evade.

The boolean gun may be too wide, but it is not too fast, and his phaser is neither fast nor powerful enough to defeat Palpatine. Khan gets choked or electrocuted before he can fire based on the evidence presented.

Originally posted by The Scenario
Post the quote if you want anyone to believe you. Proof, quan. We both know he said nothing of the sort. What he actually said was that you represented more of Russell's abilities. He said nothing about who was the better debator.

Still, I'm glad we've finally established that Ganondorf was far more powerful than Russell.

The boolean gun may be too wide, but it is not too fast, and his phaser is neither fast nor powerful enough to defeat Palpatine. Khan gets choked or electrocuted before he can fire based on the evidence presented.

He actually quantified it by saying I was ten percent better. I don't care to look it up again. You lying about it won't change it. You'll dance around it if I do find it and start making shit up.

What makes you think the Boolean gun is slower than the blaster fire ?

A force push hurt Palpatine and the phaser outright kills the old guy. Nah, based off evidence presented he allows his opponents to speak and aim at him. In character not how you want to script the battle.

Give in to your hate

Originally posted by quanchi112
[B]He actually quantified it by saying I was ten percent better. I don't care to look it up again. You lying about it won't change it. You'll dance around it if I do find it and start making shit up.

All you're saying here is that you can't prove it.


What makes you think the Boolean gun is slower than the blaster fire ?

A force push hurt Palpatine and the phaser outright kills the old guy. Nah, based off evidence presented he allows his opponents to speak and aim at him. In character not how you want to script the battle.

What makes you think it's faster?

In character Palpatine would just electrocute Khan and be done with it.

Originally posted by The Scenario
All you're saying here is that you can't prove it.

What makes you think it's faster?

In character Palpatine would just electrocute Khan and be done with it.

Dude, you cried about it and got on his nerves when you kept asking him questions about it.

Feats. Khan resisted 8 stun blasts.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Dude, you cried about it and got on his nerves when you kept asking him questions about it.

Prove it, quan. Post the quotes.


Feats. Khan resisted 8 stun blasts.

Not enough to resist lightning, sorry.