Originally posted by Rao Kal Eltbh, the sheer impressiveness of lobo's 'stellar mass' feat never really registered with me until you broke it down just now. nicely done. 👆
I disagreeTake away the mallet and how does Thor ends up performing vs The Hulk? Mjolnir makes up the lack of strength.
That is how it has been shown by different writers and many will agree that if you take Mjolnir away from Thor, he is just simply outperformed in the strength dept.
Like you said writers have different ideas, come up with a decent feat of strength made by Thor under Simonson and amp that by 4
Now take a look at how Kurse was treated by another writer, Professor Hulk ended up looking better than Kurse
Aaron's Thor is only ONE depiction of Thor, this does not becomes the standard for Thor, but lets say you are correct and that Thor under Aaron is the average for Thor 1 planetary mass x 4 = 4 planetary masses. IIRC Lobo has stellar mass feats, stellar mass >>>>>>> planetary mass, so Lobo is being portrayed at ridiculous level's of strength compared to thor relatively speaking
Lobo pulls solar mass, solar mass >>>>>>>>>>>>>> planetary mass or planetary mass x 4
So basically this is WHY I disagree
moreover, lobo appeared to throw said mass around with relative ease. 🙂
