Lobo vs Kurse

Originally posted by pym-ftw
planet busting is equal to 16.23333 times planet mass level.

Where do you get that? Serious question.

Nasa's Theoretical weight of earth diveded into Nato's Theoretical force needed to destroy the earth.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Nasa's Theoretical weight if earth diveded into Nato's Theoretical force needed to destroy the earth.

Ah so your math using numbers from reliable sources. Thanks.

Yeah I'm not H1

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Yeah I'm not H1

In case "your math" came out wrong, I meant you did the actual number crunching with those two sources, not taking random numbers.

Its 110,000,000,000,000,000,000,000/6,580,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 which equals roughly 16.7

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
He may consistently perform more strength feats, but it's silly to claim it shames Thor's.

Yes it is true Thor is ultimately more formidable with Mjolnir, but he definitely does not become helpless as you're trying to portray.

Ah so now we get to the crux of the matter. Your whole basis for your stance is to put down Kurse and his 4x Thor's strength, which ultimately puts down Thor. That kinda comes off a bit trolly.

So you throw away everything including relative showings and history for a one feat? That's sort of a slippery slope don't you think?

Since apparently this is a very good topic of conversation

What do you think if I make the proper thread?

Hammerless thor vs various incarnation of hulk in a gauntlet

Originally posted by pym-ftw
planet busting is equal to 16.23333 times planet mass level.

Solar mass >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That x 4. IMO

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Solar mass >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That x 4. IMO

According to Wikipedia, solar mass is about 332,946 times the mass of Earth.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
I don't get it

Originally posted by Rao Kal El

See how the mouth is perfectly open for insertion? It's all making perfect sense now. And, pineapples.

Tbf if you move the sun, everything comes with it. Its still roughly 3x planet busting but it isnt as massive as it was made to look like.

@ delta

😆

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Tbf if you move the sun, everything comes with it. Its still roughly 3x planet busting but it isnt as massive as it was made to look like.

I got the weight of the Sun as 19,916,224.36 times the amount needed to destroy Earth, if I'm doing this right.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Tbf if you move the sun, everything comes with it. Its still roughly 3x planet busting but it isnt as massive as it was made to look like.

Wait what?

Is easier to move a solar system than to bust a planet? Source?

I will think that moving solar mass without leverage will be more challenging

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Wait what?

Is easier to move a solar system than to bust a planet?

I think he was saying it's roughly 3 times as hard to move a solar system as to bust Earth. Seems low to me. shrug

I just said moving a sun is 3x the force needed to planet bust. Do you happen to have the lobo scan/was it posted earlier?

333 quadrillion / 110 quadrillion

Originally posted by pym-ftw
I just said moving a sun is 3x the force needed to planet bust. Do you happen to have the lobo scan/was it posted earlier?

Originally posted by Galan007
Lobo shits on logic. He wins.

Damn you ninja